A YANG Data Model for Dual-Stack Lite (DS-Lite)
RFC 8513
|
| Document |
Type |
|
RFC - Proposed Standard
(January 2019; No errata)
|
|
Authors |
|
Mohamed Boucadair
,
Christian Jacquenet
,
Senthil Sivakumar
|
|
Last updated |
|
2019-01-15
|
|
Replaces |
|
draft-boucadair-softwire-dslite-yang
|
|
Stream |
|
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
|
|
Formats |
|
plain text
html
pdf
htmlized
bibtex
|
|
Yang Validation |
|
☯
0 errors, 0 warnings.
draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-yang-17.txt:
xym 0.4:
Extracting 'ietf-dslite@2018-02-26.yang'
Removed 0 empty lines
ietf-dslite@2018-02-26.yang:
pyang 1.7.5: pyang --verbose --ietf -p {libs} {model}:
No validation errors
yanglint 0.14.80: yanglint --verbose -p {rfclib} -p {draftlib} -p {tmplib} {model} -i:
No validation errors
|
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
Additional Resources |
|
|
| Stream |
WG state
|
|
Submitted to IESG for Publication
|
|
Document shepherd |
|
Ian Farrer
|
|
Shepherd write-up |
|
Show
(last changed 2018-01-10)
|
| IESG |
IESG state |
|
RFC 8513 (Proposed Standard)
|
|
Action Holders |
|
(None)
|
|
Consensus Boilerplate |
|
Yes
|
|
Telechat date |
|
|
|
Responsible AD |
|
Terry Manderson
|
|
Send notices to |
|
"Ian Farrer" <ianfarrer@gmx.com>
|
| IANA |
IANA review state |
|
IANA OK - Actions Needed
|
|
IANA action state |
|
RFC-Ed-Ack
|
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) M. Boucadair
Request for Comments: 8513 C. Jacquenet
Category: Standards Track Orange
ISSN: 2070-1721 S. Sivakumar
Cisco Systems
January 2019
A YANG Data Model for Dual-Stack Lite (DS-Lite)
Abstract
This document defines a YANG module for the Dual-Stack Lite (DS-Lite)
Address Family Transition Router (AFTR) and Basic Bridging BroadBand
(B4) elements.
Status of This Memo
This is an Internet Standards Track document.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8513.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Boucadair, et al. Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 8513 DS-Lite YANG Module January 2019
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2. DS-Lite YANG Module: An Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3. DS-Lite YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
6. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
6.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
6.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Appendix A. B4 Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Appendix B. AFTR Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
1. Introduction
This document defines a data model for DS-Lite [RFC6333], using the
YANG data modeling language [RFC7950]. Both the Address Family
Transition Router (AFTR) and Basic Bridging BroadBand (B4) elements
are covered by this specification.
Figure 1 is a slight adaptation of Figure 1 from RFC 6333 and is
provided here for the convenience of the reader.
Boucadair, et al. Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 8513 DS-Lite YANG Module January 2019
+-----------+
| Host |
+-----+-----+
|192.0.2.1
|
|
|192.0.2.2
+---------|---------+
| | |
| Home router |
|+--------+--------+|
|| B4 ||
|+--------+--------+|
+--------|||--------+
|||2001:db8:0:1::1
|||
|||<-IPv4-in-IPv6 Softwire
|||
-------|||-------
/ ||| \
| ISP core network |
\ ||| /
-------|||-------
|||
|||2001:db8:0:2::1
+--------|||--------+
| AFTR |
|+--------+--------+|
|| Concentrator ||
|+--------+--------+|
| |NAT| |
| +-+-+ |
+---------|---------+
|198.51.100.1
|
--------|--------
/ | \
| Internet |
\ | /
--------|--------
|
|203.0.113.1
+-----+-----+
| IPv4 Host |
+-----------+
Figure 1: DS-Lite Base Architecture
Boucadair, et al. Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 8513 DS-Lite YANG Module January 2019
DS-Lite deployment considerations are discussed in [RFC6908].
This document follows the guidelines of [RFC8407], uses the common
YANG types defined in [RFC6991], and adopts the Network Management
Datastore Architecture (NMDA) [RFC8342].
1.1. Terminology
This document makes use of the terms defined in Section 3 of
[RFC6333].
The terminology for describing YANG data models is defined in
[RFC7950].
The meaning of the symbols in tree diagrams is defined in [RFC8340].
2. DS-Lite YANG Module: An Overview
As shown in Figure 1:
o The AFTR element is a combination of an IPv4-in-IPv6 tunnel and a
NAPT function (Section 2.2 of [RFC3022]).
o The B4 element is an IPv4-in-IPv6 tunnel.
Therefore, the DS-Lite YANG module is designed to augment both the
Interfaces YANG module [RFC8343] and the NAT YANG module [RFC8512]
with DS-Lite-specific features.
The YANG "feature" statement is used to distinguish which of the
DS-Lite elements ('aftr' or 'b4') is relevant for a specific data
node.
Concretely, the DS-Lite YANG module (Figure 2) augments the
Interfaces YANG module with the following:
o An IPv6 address used by the tunnel endpoint (AFTR or B4) for
sending and receiving IPv4-in-IPv6 packets (ipv6-address).
o An IPv4 address that is used by the tunnel endpoint (AFTR or B4)
for troubleshooting purposes (ipv4-address).
o An IPv6 address used by a B4 element to reach its AFTR (aftr-
ipv6-addr).
o The tunnel MTU used to avoid fragmentation (tunnel-mtu).
Boucadair, et al. Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 8513 DS-Lite YANG Module January 2019
o A policy to instruct the tunnel endpoint (AFTR or B4) whether it
must preserve Differentiated Services Code Point (DSCP) marking
when encapsulating/decapsulating packets (v6-v4-dscp-
preservation).
In addition, the DS-Lite YANG module augments the NAT YANG module
(policy, in particular) with the following:
o A policy to limit the number of DS-Lite softwires per subscriber
(max-softwire-per-subscriber).
o A policy to instruct the AFTR whether a state can be automatically
migrated (state-migrate).
o Further, in order to prevent a Denial of Service (DoS) by
frequently changing the source IPv6 address, 'b4-address-change-
limit' is used to rate-limit such changes.
o An instruction to rewrite the TCP Maximum Segment Size (MSS)
option (mss-clamping) to avoid TCP fragmentation.
Given that the NAPT table of the AFTR element is extended to include
the source IPv6 address of incoming packets, the DS-Lite YANG module
augments the NAPT44 mapping entry with the following:
o b4-ipv6-address, which is used to record the source IPv6 address
of a packet received from a B4 element. This IPv6 address is
required to disambiguate between the overlapping IPv4 address
space of subscribers.
o The value of the Traffic Class field in the IPv6 header as
received from a B4 element (v6-dscp): This information is used to
preserve DSCP marking when encapsulating/decapsulating at the
AFTR.
o The IPv4 DSCP marking of the IPv4 packet received from a B4
element (internal-v4-dscp): This information can be used by the
AFTR for setting the DSCP of packets relayed to a B4 element.
o The IPv4 DSCP marking as set by the AFTR in its external interface
(external-v4-dscp): An AFTR can be instructed to preserve the same
marking or to set it to another value when forwarding an IPv4
packet destined to a remote IPv4 host.
Access Control List (ACL) and Quality-of-Service (QoS) policies
discussed in Section 2.5 of [RFC6908] are out of scope. A YANG
module for ACLs is documented in [ACL-YANG].
Boucadair, et al. Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 8513 DS-Lite YANG Module January 2019
Likewise, considerations that are related to the Port Control
Protocol (PCP) and discussed in Section 8.5 of [RFC6333] are out of
scope. A YANG module for PCP is documented in [YANG-PCP].
The YANG module "ietf-dslite" has the following structure:
module: ietf-dslite
augment /if:interfaces/if:interface:
+--rw ipv6-address? inet:ipv6-address
+--rw ipv4-address? inet:ipv4-address
+--rw aftr-ipv6-addr? inet:ipv6-address {b4}?
+--rw tunnel-mtu? uint16
+--rw v6-v4-dscp-preservation? boolean
augment /nat:nat/nat:instances/nat:instance/nat:policy:
+--rw max-softwires-per-subscriber? uint8 {aftr}?
+--rw state-migrate? boolean {aftr}?
+--rw b4-address-change-limit? uint32 {aftr}?
+--rw mss-clamping {aftr}?
+--rw enable? boolean
+--rw mss-value? uint16
augment /nat:nat/nat:instances/nat:instance
/nat:mapping-table/nat:mapping-entry:
+--rw b4-ipv6-address {aftr}?
| +--rw address? inet:ipv6-address
| +--rw last-address-change? yang:date-and-time
+--rw v6-dscp? inet:dscp {aftr}?
+--rw internal-v4-dscp? inet:dscp {aftr}?
+--rw external-v4-dscp? inet:dscp {aftr}?
augment /nat:nat/nat:instances/nat:instance
/nat:statistics/nat:mappings-statistics:
+--ro active-softwires? yang:gauge32 {aftr}?
notifications:
+---n b4-address-change-limit-policy-violation {aftr}?
+--ro id -> /nat:nat/instances/instance/id
+--ro policy-id -> /nat:nat/instances/instance/policy/id
+--ro address inet:ipv6-address
Figure 2: DS-Lite YANG Tree Diagram
Examples to illustrate the use of the "ietf-dslite" module are
provided in Appendices A and B.
Boucadair, et al. Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 8513 DS-Lite YANG Module January 2019
3. DS-Lite YANG Module
This module uses the tunnel interface identity defined in [RFC7224].
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-dslite@2019-01-10.yang"
module ietf-dslite {
yang-version 1.1;
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-dslite";
prefix dslite;
import ietf-inet-types {
prefix inet;
reference
"Section 4 of RFC 6991";
}
import ietf-interfaces {
prefix if;
reference
"RFC 8343: A YANG Data Model for Interface Management";
}
import iana-if-type {
prefix ianaift;
reference
"RFC 7224: IANA Interface Type YANG Module";
}
import ietf-nat {
prefix nat;
reference
"RFC 8512: A YANG Module for Network Address Translation (NAT)
and Network Prefix Translation (NPT)";
}
import ietf-yang-types {
prefix yang;
reference
"Section 3 of RFC 6991";
}
organization
"IETF Softwire Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/softwire/>
WG List: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
Editor: Mohamed Boucadair
<mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Boucadair, et al. Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 8513 DS-Lite YANG Module January 2019
Author: Christian Jacquenet
<mailto:christian.jacquenet@orange.com>
Author: Senthil Sivakumar
<mailto:ssenthil@cisco.com>";
description
"This module is a YANG module for DS-Lite AFTR and B4
implementations.
Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject
to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License
set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC 8513; see
the RFC itself for full legal notices.";
revision 2019-01-10 {
description
"Initial revision.";
reference
"RFC 8513: A YANG Data Model for Dual-Stack Lite (DS-Lite)";
}
identity dslite {
base ianaift:tunnel;
description
"DS-Lite tunnel.";
}
/*
* Features
*/
feature b4 {
description
"The B4 element is a function implemented on a dual-stack-capable
node, either a directly connected device or Customer Premises
Equipment (CPE), that creates a tunnel to an AFTR.";
reference
"Section 5 of RFC 6333";
}
Boucadair, et al. Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 8513 DS-Lite YANG Module January 2019
feature aftr {
description
"An AFTR element is the combination of an IPv4-in-IPv6 tunnel
endpoint and an IPv4-IPv4 NAT implemented on the same node.";
reference
"Section 6 of RFC 6333";
}
/*
* Augments
*/
augment "/if:interfaces/if:interface" {
when 'derived-from(if:type, "dslite")';
description
"Augments Interface module with DS-Lite parameters.
IANA interface types are maintained at this registry:
<https://www.iana.org/assignments/ianaiftype-mib/>.
tunnel (131), -- Encapsulation interface";
leaf ipv6-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"IPv6 address of the local DS-Lite endpoint (AFTR or B4).";
reference
"RFC 6333: Dual-Stack Lite Broadband Deployments Following
IPv4 Exhaustion";
}
leaf ipv4-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"IPv4 address of the local DS-Lite AFTR or B4.
192.0.0.1 is reserved for the AFTR element, while
192.0.0.0/29 is reserved for the B4 element.
This address can be used to report ICMP problems and will
appear in traceroute outputs.";
reference
"RFC 6333: Dual-Stack Lite Broadband Deployments Following
IPv4 Exhaustion";
}
leaf aftr-ipv6-addr {
if-feature "b4";
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"Indicates the AFTR's IPv6 address to be used by a B4
Boucadair, et al. Standards Track [Page 9]
RFC 8513 DS-Lite YANG Module January 2019
element.";
reference
"RFC 6333: Dual-Stack Lite Broadband Deployments Following
IPv4 Exhaustion";
}
leaf tunnel-mtu {
type uint16;
description
"Configures a tunnel MTU.
RFC 6908 specifies that since fragmentation and reassembly
are not optimal, the operator should do everything possible
to eliminate the need for them. If the operator uses simple
IPv4-in-IPv6 softwire, it is recommended that the MTU size
of the IPv6 network between the B4 and the AFTR account
for the additional overhead (40 bytes).";
reference
"RFC 6908: Deployment Considerations for Dual-Stack Lite";
}
leaf v6-v4-dscp-preservation {
type boolean;
description
"Copies the DSCP value from the IPv6 header, and vice versa.
According to Section 2.10 of RFC 6908, operators should
use the uniform model by provisioning the network such
that the AFTR/B4 copies the DSCP value in the IPv4 header
to the Traffic Class field in the IPv6 header, after the
IPv4-in-IPv6 encapsulation.";
reference
"Section 2.10 of RFC 6908";
}
}
augment "/nat:nat/nat:instances/nat:instance/nat:policy" {
when "derived-from-or-self(/nat:nat/nat:instances/nat:instance"
+ "/nat:type, 'nat:napt44')"
+ " and /nat:nat/nat:instances/nat:instance/"
+ "nat:per-interface-binding='dslite'";
if-feature "aftr";
description
"Augments the NAPT44 module with AFTR parameters.";
leaf max-softwires-per-subscriber {
type uint8;
default "1";
description
"Configures the maximum softwires per subscriber feature.
Boucadair, et al. Standards Track [Page 10]
RFC 8513 DS-Lite YANG Module January 2019
A subscriber is uniquely identified by means
of a subscriber-mask (subscriber-mask-v6).
This policy aims to prevent a misbehaving subscriber from
mounting several DS-Lite softwires that would consume
additional AFTR resources (e.g., get more external ports
if the quota was enforced on a per-softwire basis and
consume extra processing due to a large number of active
softwires).";
reference
"Section 4 of RFC 7785";
}
leaf state-migrate {
type boolean;
default "true";
description
"State migration is enabled by default.
In the event a new IPv6 address is assigned to the B4 element,
the AFTR should migrate existing state to be bound to the new
IPv6 address. This operation ensures that traffic destined to
the previous B4's IPv6 address will be redirected to the newer
B4's IPv6 address. The destination IPv6 address for tunneling
return traffic from the AFTR should be the last seen as the
B4's IPv6 source address from the user device (e.g., CPE).
The AFTR uses the subscriber-mask-v6 to determine whether two
IPv6 addresses belong to the same CPE (e.g., if the
subscriber-mask-v6 is set to 56, the AFTR concludes that
2001:db8:100:100::1 and 2001:db8:100:100::2 belong to the same
CPE assigned with 2001:db8:100:100::/56).";
reference
"RFC 7785: Recommendations for Prefix Binding in the Context
of Softwire Dual-Stack Lite";
}
leaf b4-address-change-limit {
type uint32;
units "seconds";
default "1800";
description
"Minimum number of seconds between a successive B4's IPv6
address change from the same prefix.
Changing the source B4's IPv6 address may be used as an attack
vector. Packets with a new B4's IPv6 address from the same
prefix should be rate-limited.
It is recommended that this rate limit be set to 30 minutes;
Boucadair, et al. Standards Track [Page 11]
RFC 8513 DS-Lite YANG Module January 2019
other values can be set on a per-deployment basis.";
reference
"RFC 7785: Recommendations for Prefix Binding in the Context
of Softwire Dual-Stack Lite";
}
container mss-clamping {
description
"MSS rewriting configuration to avoid IPv6 fragmentation.";
leaf enable {
type boolean;
description
"Enable/disable MSS rewriting feature.";
}
leaf mss-value {
type uint16;
units "octets";
description
"Sets the MSS value to be used for MSS rewriting.";
}
}
}
augment "/nat:nat/nat:instances/nat:instance"
+ "/nat:mapping-table/nat:mapping-entry" {
when "derived-from-or-self(/nat:nat/nat:instances/nat:instance"
+ "/nat:type, 'nat:napt44')"
+ "and /nat:nat/nat:instances/nat:instance"
+ "/nat:per-interface-binding='dslite'";
if-feature "aftr";
description
"Augments the NAPT44 mapping table with DS-Lite specifics.";
container b4-ipv6-address {
description
"Records the IPv6 address used by a B4 element and the last
time that address changed.";
leaf address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"Corresponds to the IPv6 address used by a B4 element.";
reference
"RFC 6333: Dual-Stack Lite Broadband Deployments Following
IPv4 Exhaustion";
}
leaf last-address-change {
type yang:date-and-time;
description
"Records the last time that the address changed.";
}
Boucadair, et al. Standards Track [Page 12]
RFC 8513 DS-Lite YANG Module January 2019
}
leaf v6-dscp {
when "/if:interfaces/if:interface"
+ "/dslite:v6-v4-dscp-preservation = 'true'";
type inet:dscp;
description
"DSCP value used at the softwire level (i.e., IPv6 header).";
}
leaf internal-v4-dscp {
when "/if:interfaces/if:interface"
+ "/dslite:v6-v4-dscp-preservation = 'true'";
type inet:dscp;
description
"DSCP value of the encapsulated IPv4 packet.";
}
leaf external-v4-dscp {
when "/if:interfaces/if:interface"
+ "/dslite:v6-v4-dscp-preservation = 'true'";
type inet:dscp;
description
"DSCP value of the translated IPv4 packet as marked by
the AFTR.";
}
}
augment "/nat:nat/nat:instances/nat:instance"
+ "/nat:statistics/nat:mappings-statistics" {
if-feature "aftr";
description
"Indicates the number of active softwires.";
leaf active-softwires {
type yang:gauge32;
description
"The number of currently active softwires on the AFTR
instance.";
}
}
/*
* Notifications
*/
notification b4-address-change-limit-policy-violation {
if-feature "aftr";
description
"Generates notifications when a B4 unsuccessfully attempts
to change the IPv6 address in a time shorter than the value
of b4-address-change-limit.
Boucadair, et al. Standards Track [Page 13]
RFC 8513 DS-Lite YANG Module January 2019
Notifications are rate-limited (notify-interval).";
leaf id {
type leafref {
path "/nat:nat/nat:instances/nat:instance/nat:id";
}
mandatory true;
description
"NAT instance identifier.";
}
leaf policy-id {
type leafref {
path "/nat:nat/nat:instances/nat:instance/nat:policy/nat:id";
}
mandatory true;
description
"Policy identifier.";
}
leaf address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
mandatory true;
description
"B4's IPv6 address.";
}
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
Boucadair, et al. Standards Track [Page 14]
RFC 8513 DS-Lite YANG Module January 2019
4. Security Considerations
The YANG module specified in this document defines a schema for data
that is designed to be accessed via network management protocols such
as NETCONF [RFC6241] or RESTCONF [RFC8040]. The lowest NETCONF layer
is the secure transport layer, and the mandatory-to-implement secure
transport is Secure Shell (SSH) [RFC6242]. The lowest RESTCONF layer
is HTTPS, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is TLS
[RFC8446].
The Network Configuration Access Control Model (NACM) [RFC8341]
provides the means to restrict access for particular NETCONF or
RESTCONF users to a preconfigured subset of all available NETCONF or
RESTCONF protocol operations and content.
All data nodes defined in the YANG module that can be created,
modified, and deleted (i.e., config true, which is the default) are
considered sensitive. Write operations (e.g., edit-config) applied
to these data nodes without proper protection can negatively affect
network operations. An attacker who is able to access the B4/AFTR
can undertake various attacks, such as:
o Setting the value of 'aftr-ipv6-addr' on the B4 to point to an
illegitimate AFTR so that it can intercept all the traffic sent by
a B4. Illegitimately intercepting users' traffic is an attack
with severe implications on privacy.
o Setting the MTU to a low value, which may increase the number of
fragments ('tunnel-mtu' for both B4 and AFTR).
o Setting 'max-softwire-per-subscriber' to an arbitrary high value,
which will be exploited by a misbehaving user to grab more
resources (by mounting as many softwires as required to get more
external IP addresses/ports) or to perform a DoS on the AFTR by
mounting a massive number of softwires.
o Setting 'state-migrate' to 'false' on the AFTR. This action may
lead to a service degradation for the users.
o Setting 'b4-address-change-limit' to an arbitrary low value can
ease DoS attacks based on frequent change of the B4 IPv6 address.
o Setting 'v6-v4-dscp-preservation' to 'false" may lead to a service
degradation if some policies are applied on the network based on
the DSCP value.
Additional security considerations are discussed in [RFC8512].
Boucadair, et al. Standards Track [Page 15]
RFC 8513 DS-Lite YANG Module January 2019
Security considerations related to DS-Lite are discussed in
[RFC6333].
5. IANA Considerations
IANA has registered the following URI in the "ns" subregistry within
the "IETF XML Registry" [RFC3688]:
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-dslite
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A; the requested URI is an XML namespace.
IANA has registered the following YANG module in the "YANG Module
Names" subregistry [RFC7950] within the "YANG Parameters" registry.
name: ietf-dslite
namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-dslite
prefix: dslite
reference: RFC 8513
6. References
6.1. Normative References
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>.
[RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
(NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>.
[RFC6242] Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure
Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6242>.
[RFC6333] Durand, A., Droms, R., Woodyatt, J., and Y. Lee, "Dual-
Stack Lite Broadband Deployments Following IPv4
Exhaustion", RFC 6333, DOI 10.17487/RFC6333, August 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6333>.
[RFC6991] Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types",
RFC 6991, DOI 10.17487/RFC6991, July 2013,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6991>.
Boucadair, et al. Standards Track [Page 16]
RFC 8513 DS-Lite YANG Module January 2019
[RFC7224] Bjorklund, M., "IANA Interface Type YANG Module",
RFC 7224, DOI 10.17487/RFC7224, May 2014,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7224>.
[RFC7950] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language",
RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950>.
[RFC8040] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF
Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040>.
[RFC8341] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration
Access Control Model", STD 91, RFC 8341,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8341, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8341>.
[RFC8343] Bjorklund, M., "A YANG Data Model for Interface
Management", RFC 8343, DOI 10.17487/RFC8343, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8343>.
[RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446>.
[RFC8512] Boucadair, M., Ed., Sivakumar, S., Jacquenet, C.,
Vinapamula, S., and Q. Wu, "A YANG Module for Network
Address Translation (NAT) and Network Prefix Translation
(NPT)", RFC 8512, DOI 10.17487/RFC8512, January 2019,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8512>.
6.2. Informative References
[ACL-YANG] Jethanandani, M., Agarwal, S., Huang, L., and D. Blair,
"Network Access Control List (ACL) YANG Data Model", Work
in Progress, draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-21, November
2018.
[RFC3022] Srisuresh, P. and K. Egevang, "Traditional IP Network
Address Translator (Traditional NAT)", RFC 3022,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3022, January 2001,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3022>.
[RFC6908] Lee, Y., Maglione, R., Williams, C., Jacquenet, C., and
M. Boucadair, "Deployment Considerations for Dual-Stack
Lite", RFC 6908, DOI 10.17487/RFC6908, March 2013,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6908>.
Boucadair, et al. Standards Track [Page 17]
RFC 8513 DS-Lite YANG Module January 2019
[RFC7785] Vinapamula, S. and M. Boucadair, "Recommendations for
Prefix Binding in the Context of Softwire Dual-Stack
Lite", RFC 7785, DOI 10.17487/RFC7785, February 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7785>.
[RFC8340] Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams",
BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8340>.
[RFC8342] Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K.,
and R. Wilton, "Network Management Datastore Architecture
(NMDA)", RFC 8342, DOI 10.17487/RFC8342, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8342>.
[RFC8407] Bierman, A., "Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of
Documents Containing YANG Data Models", BCP 216, RFC 8407,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8407, October 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8407>.
[YANG-PCP] Boucadair, M., Jacquenet, C., Sivakumar, S., and
S. Vinapamula, "YANG Modules for the Port Control Protocol
(PCP)", Work in Progress, draft-boucadair-pcp-yang-05,
October 2017.
Boucadair, et al. Standards Track [Page 18]
RFC 8513 DS-Lite YANG Module January 2019
Appendix A. B4 Example
The following example shows a B4 element (2001:db8:0:1::1) that is
configured with an AFTR element (2001:db8:0:2::1). The B4 element is
also instructed to preserve the DSCP marking.
<interfaces>
<interface>
<name>myB4</name>
<type>dslite:dslite</type>
<enabled>true</enabled>
<dslite:ipv6-address>
2001:db8:0:1::1
</dslite:ipv6-address>
<dslite:aftr-ipv6-addr>
2001:db8:0:2::1
</dslite:aftr-ipv6-addr>
<dslite:v6-v4-dscp-preservation>
true
</dslite:v6-v4-dscp-preservation>
</interface>
</interfaces>
Appendix B. AFTR Examples
The following example shows an AFTR that is reachable at
2001:db8:0:2::1. Also, this XML snippet indicates that the AFTR is
provided with an IPv4 address (192.0.0.1) to be used for
troubleshooting purposes such as reporting problems to B4s.
Note that a subscriber is identified by a subscriber-mask [RFC7785]
that can be configured by means of [RFC8512].
<interfaces>
<interface>
<name>myAFTR</name>
<type>dslite:dslite</type>
<enabled>true</enabled>
<dslite:ipv6-address>2001:db8:0:2::1</dslite:ipv6-address>
<dslite:ipv4-address>192.0.0.1</dslite:ipv4-address>
</interface>
</interfaces>
The following shows an XML excerpt depicting a dynamic UDP mapping
entry maintained by a DS-Lite AFTR for a packet received from the B4
element introduced in Appendix A. Concretely, this UDP packet
received with a source IPv6 address (2001:db8:0:1::1), a source IPv4
address (192.0.2.1), and a source port number (1568) is translated
Boucadair, et al. Standards Track [Page 19]
RFC 8513 DS-Lite YANG Module January 2019
into a UDP packet having a source IPv4 address (198.51.100.1) and
source port number (15000). The remaining lifetime of this mapping
is 300 seconds.
<mapping-entry>
<index>15</index>
<type>
dynamic-explicit
</type>
<transport-protocol>
17
</transport-protocol>
<dslite:b4-ipv6-address>
<dslite:address>
2001:db8:0:1::1
</dslite:address>
</dslite:b4-ipv6-address>
<internal-src-address>
192.0.2.1
</internal-src-address>
<internal-src-port>
<start-port-number>
1568
</start-port-number>
</internal-src-port>
<external-src-address>
198.51.100.1
</external-src-address>
<external-src-port>
<start-port-number>
15000
</start-port-number>
</external-src-port>
<lifetime>
300
</lifetime>
</mapping-entry>
Boucadair, et al. Standards Track [Page 20]
RFC 8513 DS-Lite YANG Module January 2019
Acknowledgements
Thanks to Qin Wu, Benoit Claise, and Andy Bierman who helped to
identify compiling errors. Mahesh Jethanandani provided early YANG
Doctors reviews; many thanks to him.
Many thanks to Ian Farrer and Tom Petch for their reviews and
comments.
Authors' Addresses
Mohamed Boucadair
Orange
Rennes 35000
France
Email: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
Christian Jacquenet
Orange
Rennes 35000
France
Email: christian.jacquenet@orange.com
Senthil Sivakumar
Cisco Systems
7100-8 Kit Creek Road
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
United States of America
Phone: +1-919-392-5158
Email: ssenthil@cisco.com
Boucadair, et al. Standards Track [Page 21]