Selection of Loop-Free Alternates for Multi-Homed Prefixes
RFC 8518
Revision differences
Document history
| Date | By | Action |
|---|---|---|
|
2019-08-19
|
Gunter Van de Velde | Closed request for Last Call review by OPSDIR with state 'Overtaken by Events' |
|
2019-08-19
|
Gunter Van de Velde | Assignment of request for Last Call review by OPSDIR to Victor Kuarsingh was marked no-response |
|
2019-03-11
|
(System) | Received changes through RFC Editor sync (created alias RFC 8518, changed title to 'Selection of Loop-Free Alternates for Multi-Homed Prefixes', changed abstract to 'Deployment … Received changes through RFC Editor sync (created alias RFC 8518, changed title to 'Selection of Loop-Free Alternates for Multi-Homed Prefixes', changed abstract to 'Deployment experience gained from implementing algorithms to determine Loop-Free Alternates (LFAs) for multi-homed prefixes (MHPs) has revealed some avenues for potential improvement. This document provides explicit inequalities that can be used to evaluate neighbors as potential alternates for MHPs. It also provides detailed criteria for evaluating potential alternates for external prefixes advertised by OSPF ASBRs. This document updates Section 6 of RFC 5286 by expanding some of the routing aspects.', changed pages to 20, changed standardization level to Proposed Standard, changed state to RFC, added RFC published event at 2019-03-11, changed IESG state to RFC Published, created updates relation between draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa and RFC 5286) |
|
2019-03-11
|
(System) | RFC published |