Using Pre-Shared Key (PSK) in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
RFC 8696

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.

Roman Danyliw Yes

Alvaro Retana No Objection

Benjamin Kaduk (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2019-08-23)
Thank you for addressing my Discuss point!

Martin Vigoureux No Objection

Warren Kumari No Objection

(Adam Roach; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2019-08-19 for -06)
Thanks for the work on this document. It seems like a useful tool
to add to the crypto toolkit, and it does a good job of explaining
exactly how to apply the described technique. I have one minor
comment.

§7:

I don't generally have a deep understanding of the math behind
encryption, and I didn't take the time to really align the technique
in this document with the bit of crypto that I do understand, so
forgive me if this is a naive observation: I was somewhat surprised
to see no text in here regarding the advisability (or lack thereof)
regarding re-use of PSKs across different sessions.

(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -06)
No email
send info

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2019-08-21 for -06)
No email
send info
I did not review this document but I'm balloting on the basis of the Gen-ART review.

(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -06)
No email
send info

(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -06)
No email
send info

(Ignas Bagdonas; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -06)
No email
send info

(Mirja Kühlewind; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -06)
No email
send info

(Suresh Krishnan; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -06)
No email
send info