Skip to main content

Update to the Process for Selection of Trustees for the IETF Trust
RFC 8714

Yes

Alvaro Retana
(Adam Roach)
(Alissa Cooper)
(Ben Campbell)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Martin Vigoureux)
(Spencer Dawkins)

No Objection

(Benjamin Kaduk)
(Ignas Bagdonas)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.

Alvaro Retana Yes

Warren Kumari No Objection

Comment (2018-10-09 for -01)
I read the protocol action, and I trust the sponsoring AD so have no problem.

This ballot position may be interpreted as "This is outside my area of expertise or have no cycles"

(Adam Roach; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (for -01)

                            

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (for -01)

                            

(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (for -01)

                            

(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) (was No Objection) Yes

Yes (for -01)

                            

(Martin Vigoureux; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (for -01)

                            

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (for -01)

                            

(Suresh Krishnan; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (2018-10-10 for -01)
How is the IETF Trust chair picked? I think it might be worth specifying here. Also, it would be useful to specify what subset the trustees are eligible (e.g. Nomcom appointees only or all of them) to serve as chair, and how long the chair's term will be.

(I vaguely remember that the old trust administrative procedures used a 1 year term and allowed Nomcom, IESG and IAB appointees to the *IAOC* to be chair - so for sure an update is needed)

(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2018-10-11 for -01)
I generally support this document.

One small question: is it clear from this or other document which body confirms IESG selection?

(Benjamin Kaduk; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -01)

                            

(Eric Rescorla; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2018-10-09 for -01)
Rich version of this review at:
https://mozphab-ietf.devsvcdev.mozaws.net/D12194



COMMENTS
S 1.
>      This memo updates RFCs 4071 and 4371 with regards to the selection of
>      trustees.  All other aspects of the IETF Trust remain as they are
>      today.
>   
>      For a discussion of why this change is needed and a rationale for
>      these specific changes, see [I-D.ietf-iasa2-trust-rationale].

I am surprised not to see any 2119 language here. Doesn't this
document have normative content.

(Ignas Bagdonas; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -01)

                            

(Mirja Kühlewind; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2018-10-10 for -01)
draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-rationale says that the IETF Trust selection of the NomCom is confirmed by the IESG. I didn't find it in this doc though. I guess it's specified in another document but I also couldn't find it quickly after a brief search. So just double-check that this is covered and wondering if it would make sense to state it explicitly in this doc as well.