Sending Multiple Types of Media in a Single RTP Session
RFC 8860
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 12 and is now closed.
Alvaro Retana No Objection
(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) Yes
(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) Yes
(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) Yes
(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) No Objection
(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection
A small editorial suggestion, which you can take or not as you please -- no need to respond: -- Section 5.1 -- The above sentence is changed to: This, by itself, could be confusing, because there's a whole paragraph "above". I think it makes sense to do this, to be absolutely clear: NEW The sentence containing "SHALL NOT" in the above paragraph is changed to: END
(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection
Some editorial changes in Warren's OPS DIR review at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ops-dir/current/msg01586.html See "Nits inline below (in [O,] [P], [R] format):"
(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection
(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
Meral made some comments in the Gen-ART review, I'd like to ensure that the authors have seen those comments, in case they want to address them somehow.
(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) No Objection
Warren Kumari performed the opsdir review.
(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection
(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection
(Terry Manderson; former steering group member) No Objection