Personal Assertion Token (PASSporT) Extension for Diverted Calls
RFC 8946
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.
Murray Kucherawy Yes
Alvaro Retana No Objection
Erik Kline No Objection
[nits] S3 * Reference to 8224 section 8 might consider pointing all the way to 8.3 (vis. RFC 8225 section 5.2.1.1), perhaps? S4.1 * s/possess a credential/possesses a credential/ (I think) S4.2 * Perhaps start a new paragraph at "A verification service parses..."? * Does "blind transfer" have a reference to describe it? It probably doesn't need one for the intended audience...I was just curious.
Martin Duke No Objection
Though dense, this was readable by someone with no background in the subject. Only one nit: in section 3, s/identifier/identifier.
Robert Wilton No Objection
Roman Danyliw (was Discuss) No Objection
Thank you for addressing my DISCUSS and COMMENT items.
Warren Kumari No Objection
Thanks to Linda Dunbar for the OpsDir review.
Éric Vyncke No Objection
(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection
Please respond to the Gen-ART review.
(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection
Thanks for a well-written document, Jon.
(Benjamin Kaduk; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
Thank you for addressing my Discuss (and Comment) points!
(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection
(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection
(Martin Vigoureux; former steering group member) No Objection