Updated Registration Rules for URI.ARPA
RFC 8958

Document Type RFC - Best Current Practice (December 2020; No errata)
Updates RFC 3405
Was draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update (individual in art area)
Author Ted Hardie 
Last updated 2020-12-02
Stream IETF
Formats plain text html xml pdf htmlized bibtex
Reviews
Stream WG state (None)
Document shepherd Spencer Dawkins
Shepherd write-up Show (last changed 2020-08-26)
IESG IESG state RFC 8958 (Best Current Practice)
Consensus Boilerplate Yes
Telechat date
Responsible AD Barry Leiba
Send notices to spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com, dispatch@ietf.org
IANA IANA review state IANA OK - Actions Needed
IANA action state RFC-Ed-Ack


Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                         T. Hardie
Request for Comments: 8958                                 December 2020
BCP: 65                                                                 
Updates: 3405                                                           
Category: Best Current Practice                                         
ISSN: 2070-1721

                Updated Registration Rules for URI.ARPA

Abstract

   This document updates RFC 3405 by removing references to the IETF
   tree from the procedures for requesting that a URI scheme be inserted
   into the URI.ARPA zone.

Status of This Memo

   This memo documents an Internet Best Current Practice.

   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
   received public review and has been approved for publication by the
   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
   BCPs is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.

   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8958.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction
     1.1.  Requirements Language
   2.  Updated Requirements
   3.  IANA Considerations
   4.  Security Considerations
   5.  References
     5.1.  Normative References
     5.2.  Informative References
   Author's Address

1.  Introduction

   Part Five of the Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) [RFC3405]
   describes the registration procedures for assignments in URI.ARPA.
   The document requires that registrations be in the "IETF tree" of URI
   registrations.  The use of URI scheme name trees was defined in RFC
   2717 [RFC2717] but discontinued by RFC 4395 [RFC4395] and its
   successors.  Since the use of trees was discontinued, there is no way
   in the current process set out in BCP 35 [RFC7595] to meet the
   requirement to register within that tree.

1.1.  Requirements Language

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
   BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
   capitals, as shown here.

2.  Updated Requirements

   This document removes the normative requirement from RFC 3405
   [RFC3405] for registrations in URI.ARPA to be from the IETF URI tree.

   All registrations in URI.ARPA MUST now be for schemes that are
   permanent registrations, as described in BCP 35.

3.  IANA Considerations

   This entire document is updated instructions to IANA.

4.  Security Considerations

   This update does not change the security considerations in RFC 3405
   [RFC3405].

5.  References

5.1.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [RFC3405]  Mealling, M., "Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS)
              Part Five: URI.ARPA Assignment Procedures", BCP 65,
              RFC 3405, DOI 10.17487/RFC3405, October 2002,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3405>.

   [RFC7595]  Thaler, D., Ed., Hansen, T., and T. Hardie, "Guidelines
              and Registration Procedures for URI Schemes", BCP 35,
              RFC 7595, DOI 10.17487/RFC7595, June 2015,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7595>.

   [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
              2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
              May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.

5.2.  Informative References

   [RFC2717]  Petke, R. and I. King, "Registration Procedures for URL
              Scheme Names", RFC 2717, DOI 10.17487/RFC2717, November
              1999, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2717>.

   [RFC4395]  Hansen, T., Hardie, T., and L. Masinter, "Guidelines and
              Registration Procedures for New URI Schemes", RFC 4395,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC4395, February 2006,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4395>.
Show full document text