Updated Registration Rules for URI.ARPA
RFC 8958

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.

Alissa Cooper Yes

Comment (2020-10-07 for -03)
It seems the comment from the Gen-ART review was not addressed:

"1.  Introduction

  Part five of the Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS), RFC 3405
  [RFC3405], describes the registration procedures for assignments in
  URI.ARPA.  The document requires that registrations be in the "IETF
  tree" of URI registrations.  The use of URI scheme name trees was
  defined in RFC 2717 [RFC2717] but discontinued by RFC 4395 [RFC4395].
  Since the use of trees was discontinued, there is no way in the
  current process set out in BCP 35 [RFC7595] to meet the requirement."

This is indeed a nit, but I'd prefer s/the requirement/the above requirement/.
The current text did make me briefly think "Which requirement?".

Murray Kucherawy Yes

Barry Leiba Yes

Deborah Brungard No Objection

Roman Danyliw No Objection

Martin Duke No Objection

Benjamin Kaduk No Objection

Comment (2020-10-06 for -03)
Section 1

I suggest mentioning somehow in the prose that RFC 4395 was obsoleted by
RFC 7595, to establish the last link in the chain leading to "the
current process"; in the current form the RFC 7595 reference seems to
lack any preceding motivation.

(I also agree with the Gen-ART reviewer that spelling out "the
requirement" more explicitly would be helpful; that suggestion seems to
have gotten lost in the ensuing thread.)

Erik Kline No Objection

Warren Kumari No Objection

Alvaro Retana No Objection

Martin Vigoureux No Objection

Éric Vyncke No Objection

Robert Wilton No Objection