Skip to main content

IPv6 Mesh over BLUETOOTH(R) Low Energy Using the Internet Protocol Support Profile (IPSP)
RFC 9159

Yes

Erik Kline

No Objection

Alvaro Retana
Francesca Palombini
Murray Kucherawy
Warren Kumari
(Alissa Cooper)
(Barry Leiba)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Magnus Westerlund)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.

Erik Kline Yes

Alvaro Retana No Objection

Francesca Palombini No Objection

Martin Duke (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2021-04-22)
Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS.

Murray Kucherawy No Objection

Robert Wilton No Objection

Comment (2021-02-22 for -09)
Hi,

Thank you for this document.

A couple of minor comments relating to the diagram in 3.2 (figure 2):

(1) It wasn't clear to me why the top left node was a 6LR rather than a 6LN.  If this is deliberate, it might be worth a sentence to explain the purpose here.
(2) I initially found the bubble around the v6 Mesh to be confusing  - I thought that it means that all the nodes are interconnected.  I'm not sure whether the bubble really helps the diagram, and probably could be removed, of if it is kept, I would suggest adding more space between the bubble line and the mesh network inside so that the bubble line isn't confused as representing links between the nodes.

Regards,
Rob

Roman Danyliw No Objection

Comment (2021-02-24 for -09)
Thank you Catherine Meadows for the SECDIR review.

Warren Kumari No Objection

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -09)

                            

(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -09)

                            

(Benjamin Kaduk; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2021-06-09)
Thank you for addressing my discuss and comment points!

(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -09)

                            

(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -09)

                            

(Martin Vigoureux; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2021-02-24 for -09)
Hi,

thank you for this document, just a minor comment:

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in BCP14 RFC 2119
   [RFC2119], RFC 8174 [RFC8174], when, and only when, they appear in
   all capitals, as shown here.
Strictly, this is not the text from 8174. "NOT RECOMMENDED" is missing.