@misc{rfc9177,
    series =    {Request for Comments},
    number =    9177,
    howpublished =  {RFC 9177},
    publisher = {RFC Editor},
    doi =       {10.17487/RFC9177},
    url =       {https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9177},
    author =    {Mohamed Boucadair and Jon Shallow},
    title =     {{Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) Block-Wise Transfer Options Supporting Robust Transmission}},
    pagetotal = 41,
    year =      2022,
    month =     mar,
    abstract =  {This document specifies alternative Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) block-wise transfer options: Q-Block1 and Q-Block2. These options are similar to, but distinct from, the CoAP Block1 and Block2 options defined in RFC 7959. The Q-Block1 and Q-Block2 options are not intended to replace the Block1 and Block2 options but rather have the goal of supporting Non-confirmable (NON) messages for large amounts of data with fewer packet interchanges. Also, the Q-Block1 and Q-Block2 options support faster recovery should any of the blocks get lost in transmission.},
}