Current Open Questions in Path-Aware Networking
RFC 9217
Yes
No Objection
Recuse
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this draft ready for publication in the IRTF stream?"
Colin Perkins Yes
Jen Linkova Yes
Laurent Ciavaglia Yes
Spencer Dawkins Yes
Stephen Farrell No Objection
I had a quick read and it seems fine to me. I had expected to see some mention of the difficulty of meaningfully naming path elements or on-path routers - "Do you 'trust' a path using 2001:db8::bad, 2001:db8::dead and 2001:db8::f001 for openvpn.service?" not being soemthing lending itself to being answered with a human or random machine endpoint in the loop;-) Similarly, I wondered why longer term state information didn't give rise to any tricky questions - "Do you want to use the same path you used last week when you were physically in the office (now that you're back stuck doing WFH)?" But maybe the RG considered those questions already covered by some of those mentioned in the draft, which is ok.
Brian Trammell Recuse