Skip to main content

2021-07-19-rsoc-minutes
slides-interim-2022-rfcedprog-11-sessa-2021-07-19-rsoc-minutes-00

Meeting Slides RFC Series Oversight Committee (RSOC) (rfcedprog) IAB ASG
Date and time 2022-01-01 19:00
Title 2021-07-19-rsoc-minutes
State Active
Other versions plain text
Last updated 2022-06-10

slides-interim-2022-rfcedprog-11-sessa-2021-07-19-rsoc-minutes-00
RFC SERIES OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE (RSOC)
July 19, 2021 RSOC Meeting

Reported by: Cindy Morgan, IETF Secretariat

ATTENDEES
---------------------------------
 Sarah Banks 
 Jay Daley (IETF LLC Board Liaison, non-voting)
 Tony Hansen 
 John Levine, (Temporary RFC Series Project Manager, non-voting)
 Cindy Morgan (Scribe, non-voting)
 Adam Roach
 David Schinazi 
 Peter Saint-Andre (RSOC Chair) 

GUEST
---------------------------------
 Sandy Ginoza (RFC Production Center)

REGRETS
---------------------------------
 Cullen Jennings (IAB Lead)


RSOC DECISIONS: 2021
---------------------------------
  - 2020 Decisions: 
<https://www.iab.org/wp-content/IAB-uploads/2021/01/rsoc-decisions-2020.txt>

  - 2019 Decisions: 
<https://www.iab.org/wp-content/IAB-uploads/2020/01/rsoc-decisions-2019.txt>


ACTION ITEM REVIEW
---------------------------------

  - 2020-09-21: Jay Daley, John Levine, Henrik Levkowetz, Peter Saint-
    Andre, and Robert Sparks to work with Sandy Ginoza to propose a 
    minimum profile of v3 XML tags that the RPC would add before 
    publication of an RFC if they were not included by the authors.
    * Deadline: 2021-08

  - 2021-01-26: John Levine to start a discussion with the community 
    about whether the XML of an RFC can be changed as long as the text 
    remains immutable. (NOTE: Depends on action item for "RFC XML and 
    Style Guide change management team," above.)
    * Deadline: 2021-08

  - 2021-03-15: John Levine and Peter Saint-Andre to discuss the 
    prioritization and time commitment needed to put together an end-to-
    end analysis to ensure that v3 XML can be used effectively and 
    seamlessly at all stages of the authoring process (Recommendation 
    8), and report back to the RSOC.
    * Deadline 2021-08

  - 2021-05-17: Peter Saint-Andre, Jay Daley, and John Levine to chat 
    with the RPC and recent authors about their perspectives on the 
    GitHub experiment, and report back to RSOC. 
    * Deadline: 2021-08


MINUTES
---------------------------------

1. Administrivia

  The minutes of the 2021-06-21 RSOC meeting were approved.


2. RFC XML and Style Guide change management team

  Peter Saint-Andre reported that the RFC XML and Style Guide change 
  management team is making progress to close issues in GitHub and 
  expects to be through the backlog by their next meeting.

  The next steps are to work with the RPC to propose a minimum profile 
  of v3 XML tags that the RPC would add before publication of an RFC if 
  they were not included by the authors, and to update RFC 7991.

  Jay Daley reminded the RSOC that the reason for defining a minimum 
  profile of v3 XML tags to be added by the RPC was to cut down on the 
  time and costs for the RPC to edit documents.

  Sandy Ginoza said that having better guidance for authors about how to 
  use v3 and take advantage of the functionality there would also help 
  cut down on the time and cost for editing RFCs.


3. v3 Issues and Tools

  Peter Saint-Andre said that there was nothing new to report here, 
  since the open action for John Levine to start a discussion with the 
  community about whether the XML of an RFC can be changed as long as 
  the text remains immutable depends on the outcome of the work of the 
  RFC XML and Style Guide change management team.


4. Recommendations Following From the I-D Authors Survey

  Recommendation 5:  The process by which authors review RPC changes 
  should be examined with a view towards understanding what tooling is 
  required if this process is to use XML and not plain text as the 
  common format.

  Recommendation 8:  An end-to-end analysis is carried out to ensure 
  that v3 XML can be used effectively and seamlessly at all stages of 
  the authoring process.

  Recommendation 9:  A significant minority want to use Markdown or 
  similar and a strategic decision is needed on whether or not this 
  should be "officially" supported either in some stages or in the full 
  end-to-end authoring process. (see also Q20)

  Peter Saint-Andre reported that there is an early draft of a 
  spreadsheet listing the various tools that authors use, but that it 
  still needs more work. Jay Daley said that he expects to be able to 
  devote more time to that after IETF 111.

  Peter Saint-Andre noted that Alice Russo provided some information 
  from the RPC about the most recent GitHub experiment, and that he 
  plans to review that to see if there is useful information for RSOC 
  there.

  John Levine reported that Martin Thomson recently published a new 
  GitHub template that will be helpful for authors who submit drafts via 
  GitHub. (Template: https://github.com/martinthomson/i-d-template/blob/
  main/doc/TEMPLATE.md)


5. AOB 

  Peter Saint-Andre reported that with the bulk of the work of the RFC 
  XML and Style Guide change management team completed, Henrik Levkowetz 
  is planning to step back from contributing. The team may discuss 
  adding other people in the future.

  John Levine added that as the team works on RFC 7991bis, it plans to 
  run the suggested changes by the rfc-interest list for feedback. 

  John Levine noted that the team may want to look at other things in 
  the future, such as updating the SVG profile.

  Tony Hansen asked if any documents besides RFC 7991 need updating.

  John Levine replied that 7991 was the most urgent, but that they 
  should also look at the other format documents, particularly RFC 7992, 
  "HTML Format for RFCs."


6. Next RSOC Meeting

  The next RSOC meeting is scheduled for Monday, August 16, 2021 at 4:00 
  PM PDT.