Change the status of ADSP (RFC 5617) to Historic
status-change-adsp-rfc5617-to-historic-00
Yes
(Barry Leiba)
(Sean Turner)
(Stephen Farrell)
No Objection
(Adrian Farrel)
(Benoît Claise)
(Brian Haberman)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Richard Barnes)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Ted Lemon)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Do we approve these RFC status changes?"
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2013-11-20)
Unknown
As Barry pointed out on the IETF list, there's been a good deal of "input" on the IETF list regarding this status change, so the IESG should be aware of that and see if any of the conversation concerns us. At this point, I am satisfied with Barry's call of the consensus, hence my YES. But folks should be aware of the discussion.
Sean Turner Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Richard Barnes Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ted Lemon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown