Moving IKEv1, ISAKMP and IPsec DOI to Historic
status-change-ikev1-to-historic-00
Document history
| Date | Rev. | By | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2023-01-03
|
00 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to No IANA Actions |
|
2023-01-03
|
00 | Amy Vezza | The following approval message was sent From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce Cc: The IESG , draft-ietf-ipsec-ipsec-doi@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ipsec-isakmp-oakley@ietf.org, … The following approval message was sent From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce Cc: The IESG , draft-ietf-ipsec-ipsec-doi@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ipsec-isakmp-oakley@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ipsec-isakmp@ietf.org, iana@iana.org, ipsec-chairs@ietf.org, rdd@cert.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: Protocol Action: Internet Security Association and Key Management Protocol (ISAKMP) to Historic The IESG has approved changing the status of the following document: - Internet Security Association and Key Management Protocol (ISAKMP) (rfc2408) to Historic This protocol action is documented at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-ikev1-to-historic/ A URL of the affected document is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc2408/ Status Change Details: IKEv1 [RFC2409] and its related documents for ISAKMP [RFC2408] and IPsec DOI [RFC2407] were obsoleted by IKEv2 [RFC4306] in December 2005. IKEv2 has now seen wide deployment and provides a full replacement for all IKEv1 functionality. No new modifications or new algorithms have been accepted for IKEv1 for at least a decade. IKEv2 addresses various issues present in IKEv1, such as IKEv1 being vulnerable to amplification attacks. It is therefore timely to mark these IKEv1 specifications as Historic. Upon approval and its publication as an RFC, draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic should replace this status change document as the reference for the status change event. Personnel Roman Danyliw is the responsible Area Director. |
|
2023-01-03
|
00 | Amy Vezza | The following approval message was sent From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce Cc: The IESG , draft-ietf-ipsec-ipsec-doi@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ipsec-isakmp-oakley@ietf.org, … The following approval message was sent From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce Cc: The IESG , draft-ietf-ipsec-ipsec-doi@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ipsec-isakmp-oakley@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ipsec-isakmp@ietf.org, iana@iana.org, ipsec-chairs@ietf.org, rdd@cert.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: Protocol Action: The Internet IP Security Domain of Interpretation for ISAKMP to Historic The IESG has approved changing the status of the following document: - The Internet IP Security Domain of Interpretation for ISAKMP (rfc2407) to Historic This protocol action is documented at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-ikev1-to-historic/ A URL of the affected document is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc2407/ Status Change Details: IKEv1 [RFC2409] and its related documents for ISAKMP [RFC2408] and IPsec DOI [RFC2407] were obsoleted by IKEv2 [RFC4306] in December 2005. IKEv2 has now seen wide deployment and provides a full replacement for all IKEv1 functionality. No new modifications or new algorithms have been accepted for IKEv1 for at least a decade. IKEv2 addresses various issues present in IKEv1, such as IKEv1 being vulnerable to amplification attacks. It is therefore timely to mark these IKEv1 specifications as Historic. Upon approval and its publication as an RFC, draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic should replace this status change document as the reference for the status change event. Personnel Roman Danyliw is the responsible Area Director. |
|
2023-01-03
|
00 | Amy Vezza | The following approval message was sent From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce Cc: The IESG , draft-ietf-ipsec-ipsec-doi@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ipsec-isakmp-oakley@ietf.org, … The following approval message was sent From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce Cc: The IESG , draft-ietf-ipsec-ipsec-doi@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ipsec-isakmp-oakley@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ipsec-isakmp@ietf.org, iana@iana.org, ipsec-chairs@ietf.org, rdd@cert.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: Protocol Action: The Internet Key Exchange (IKE) to Historic The IESG has approved changing the status of the following document: - The Internet Key Exchange (IKE) (rfc2409) to Historic This protocol action is documented at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-ikev1-to-historic/ A URL of the affected document is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc2409/ Status Change Details: IKEv1 [RFC2409] and its related documents for ISAKMP [RFC2408] and IPsec DOI [RFC2407] were obsoleted by IKEv2 [RFC4306] in December 2005. IKEv2 has now seen wide deployment and provides a full replacement for all IKEv1 functionality. No new modifications or new algorithms have been accepted for IKEv1 for at least a decade. IKEv2 addresses various issues present in IKEv1, such as IKEv1 being vulnerable to amplification attacks. It is therefore timely to mark these IKEv1 specifications as Historic. Upon approval and its publication as an RFC, draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic should replace this status change document as the reference for the status change event. Personnel Roman Danyliw is the responsible Area Director. |
|
2023-01-03
|
00 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the status change |
|
2023-01-03
|
00 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
|
2023-01-03
|
00 | Amy Vezza | RFC Status Change state changed to Approved - announcement sent from Approved - announcement to be sent |
|
2023-01-03
|
00 | Amy Vezza | RFC Status Change state changed to Approved - announcement to be sent from Approved - point raised |
|
2022-12-15
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | RFC Status Change state changed to Approved - point raised from IESG Evaluation |
|
2022-12-15
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | Should be released at the same time as draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic |
|
2022-12-15
|
00 | Alvaro Retana | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana |
|
2022-12-14
|
00 | Zaheduzzaman Sarker | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Zaheduzzaman Sarker |
|
2022-12-13
|
00 | Francesca Palombini | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Francesca Palombini |
|
2022-12-13
|
00 | John Scudder | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for John Scudder |
|
2022-12-12
|
00 | Warren Kumari | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Warren Kumari |
|
2022-12-12
|
00 | Lars Eggert | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Lars Eggert |
|
2022-12-12
|
00 | Robert Wilton | [Ballot comment] Not that it matters, but I'm not sure whether Paul needs to recuse from this. To me this seems to fall well into … [Ballot comment] Not that it matters, but I'm not sure whether Paul needs to recuse from this. To me this seems to fall well into the technical remit of a Sec AD, and hence he should be able to ballot Yes on this. |
|
2022-12-12
|
00 | Robert Wilton | Ballot comment text updated for Robert Wilton |
|
2022-12-12
|
00 | Robert Wilton | [Ballot comment] Not that it matters, but I'm not sure whether Paul needs to recluse from this. To me this seems to fall well into … [Ballot comment] Not that it matters, but I'm not sure whether Paul needs to recluse from this. To me this seems to fall well into the technical remit of a Sec AD, and hence he should be able to ballot Yes on this. |
|
2022-12-12
|
00 | Robert Wilton | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Robert Wilton |
|
2022-12-11
|
00 | Murray Kucherawy | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Murray Kucherawy |
|
2022-12-08
|
00 | Éric Vyncke | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Éric Vyncke |
|
2022-12-08
|
00 | Paul Wouters | [Ballot comment] Recusing since I'm part of the process that is trying to do this. |
|
2022-12-08
|
00 | Paul Wouters | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Recuse, has been recorded for Paul Wouters |
|
2022-12-07
|
00 | Erik Kline | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Erik Kline |
|
2022-12-05
|
00 | Roman Danyliw | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2022-12-15 |
|
2022-12-05
|
00 | Roman Danyliw | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Roman Danyliw |
|
2022-12-05
|
00 | Roman Danyliw | Created "Approve" ballot |
|
2022-12-05
|
00 | Roman Danyliw | RFC Status Change state changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead |
|
2022-11-18
|
00 | (System) | IANA Review state changed to IANA - Not OK |
|
2022-11-18
|
00 | (System) | RFC Status Change state changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call |
|
2022-10-14
|
00 | Amy Vezza | The following Last Call announcement was sent out (ends 2022-11-18): From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce Reply-To: last-call@ietf.org Sender: Subject: Last Call: Moving IKEv1, ISAKMP and … The following Last Call announcement was sent out (ends 2022-11-18): From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce Reply-To: last-call@ietf.org Sender: Subject: Last Call: Moving IKEv1, ISAKMP and IPsec DOI to Historic The IESG has received a request from an individual participant to make the following status changes: - RFC2409 from Proposed Standard to Historic (The Internet Key Exchange (IKE)) - RFC2407 from Proposed Standard to Historic (The Internet IP Security Domain of Interpretation for ISAKMP) - RFC2408 from Proposed Standard to Historic (Internet Security Association and Key Management Protocol (ISAKMP)) The supporting document for this request can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-ikev1-to-historic/ The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the last-call@ietf.org mailing lists by 2022-11-18. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. The affected documents can be obtained via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc2409/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc2407/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc2408/ IESG discussion of this request can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-ikev1-to-historic/ballot/ |
|
2022-10-14
|
00 | Amy Vezza | RFC Status Change state changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested |
|
2022-10-14
|
00 | Amy Vezza | Last call announcement was changed |
|
2022-10-14
|
00 | Roman Danyliw | Last call was requested |
|
2022-10-14
|
00 | Roman Danyliw | RFC Status Change state changed to Last Call Requested from AD Review |
|
2022-10-14
|
00 | Roman Danyliw | Last call announcement was generated |
|
2022-10-14
|
00 | Roman Danyliw | RFC Status Change state changed to AD Review from Last Call Requested |
|
2022-10-14
|
00 | Roman Danyliw | Last call was requested |
|
2022-10-14
|
00 | Roman Danyliw | Last call was requested |
|
2022-10-14
|
00 | Roman Danyliw | Ballot approval text was generated |
|
2022-10-14
|
00 | Roman Danyliw | Ballot writeup was generated |
|
2022-10-14
|
00 | Roman Danyliw | RFC Status Change state changed to Last Call Requested from AD Review |
|
2022-10-14
|
00 | Robert Sparks | Added two documents to be status changed because the form is currently broken |
|
2022-10-14
|
00 | Roman Danyliw | Last call announcement was generated |
|
2022-10-14
|
00 | Roman Danyliw | New version available: status-change-ikev1-to-historic-00.txt |