Skip to main content

Move RFC 7506 to Historic
status-change-mpls-rfc7506-to-historic-01

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2024-05-30
01 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IANA Actions from In Progress
2024-05-30
01 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2024-05-30
01 Liz Flynn
The following approval message was sent
From: The IESG
To: IETF-Announce 
Cc: The IESG ,
    iana@iana.org,
    mpls-chairs@ietf.org,
    …
The following approval message was sent
From: The IESG
To: IETF-Announce 
Cc: The IESG ,
    iana@iana.org,
    mpls-chairs@ietf.org,
    rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org,
    rfc7506@ietf.org
Subject: Protocol Action: IPv6 Router Alert Option for MPLS Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) to Historic

The IESG has approved changing the status of the following document:
- IPv6 Router Alert Option for MPLS Operations, Administration, and
Maintenance (OAM)
  (rfc7506) to Historic

This protocol action is documented at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-mpls-rfc7506-to-historic/

A URL of the affected document is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7506/

Status Change Details:

Status Change for RFC 7506 – “IPv6 Router Alert Option for MPLS Operations,
Administration, and Maintenance (OAM)” to historic.

RFC 7506 allocated IPv6 Router Alert Option (RAO) value that can be used by
the MPLS Echo Request and MPLS Echo Reply messages for MPLS in IPv6
environments.

The Router Alert Option for IPv4 environments was specified by RFC 8029.

RFC 9570 retires the RAO for MPLS OAM for both IPv4 and IPv6 environments.
The document updates RFC 8029 to remove the RAO from MPLS Echo Request and
Echo Reply message encapsulations. Furthermore, RFC 9570 explains why RFC
7506
should be marked historic.

This status change document marks RFC 7506 as historic.

Personnel

  Jim Guichard is the responsible Area Director.



2024-05-30
01 Liz Flynn IESG has approved the status change
2024-05-30
01 Liz Flynn Closed "Approve" ballot
2024-05-30
01 Liz Flynn RFC Status Change state changed to Approved - announcement sent from Approved - announcement to be sent
2024-05-30
01 Cindy Morgan RFC Status Change state changed to Approved - announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation
2024-05-30
01 Francesca Palombini [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Francesca Palombini
2024-05-29
01 Warren Kumari [Ballot comment]
After a very full week of ballots, it's nice to be able to just click "NoObj" and move on...
2024-05-29
01 Warren Kumari [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Warren Kumari
2024-05-29
01 Zaheduzzaman Sarker [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Zaheduzzaman Sarker
2024-05-29
01 John Scudder [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for John Scudder
2024-05-28
01 Roman Danyliw [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Roman Danyliw
2024-05-28
01 Éric Vyncke [Ballot Position Update] Position for Éric Vyncke has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2024-05-28
01 Jim Guichard New version available: status-change-mpls-rfc7506-to-historic-01.txt
2024-05-27
00 Deb Cooley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deb Cooley
2024-05-27
00 Paul Wouters [Ballot comment]
I support Éric's DISCUSS (and hadnt even seen it myself through google + redirects)
2024-05-27
00 Paul Wouters [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Paul Wouters
2024-05-27
00 Orie Steele [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Orie Steele
2024-05-27
00 Éric Vyncke
[Ballot discuss]
Probably the most trivial DISCUSS :-)

The text cites twice "draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-norao", assuming that it is actually "draft-ietf-mpls-lspping-norao", this I-D is now published as …
[Ballot discuss]
Probably the most trivial DISCUSS :-)

The text cites twice "draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-norao", assuming that it is actually "draft-ietf-mpls-lspping-norao", this I-D is now published as RFC 9570.
2024-05-27
00 Éric Vyncke [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Éric Vyncke
2024-05-23
00 Gunter Van de Velde [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gunter Van de Velde
2024-05-16
00 Murray Kucherawy [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Murray Kucherawy
2024-05-14
00 Erik Kline [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Erik Kline
2024-05-14
00 Jim Guichard Placed on agenda for telechat - 2024-05-30
2024-05-14
00 Jim Guichard [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jim Guichard
2024-05-14
00 Jim Guichard RFC Status Change state changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2024-05-14
00 (System) RFC Status Change state changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call
2024-04-30
00 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed
2024-04-16
00 Jim Guichard Created "Approve" ballot
2024-04-16
00 Jim Guichard Closed "Approve" ballot
2024-04-16
00 Cindy Morgan
The following Last Call announcement was sent out (ends 2024-05-14):

From: The IESG
To: IETF-Announce
Reply-To: last-call@ietf.org
Sender:
Subject: Last Call: Move RFC 7506 to …
The following Last Call announcement was sent out (ends 2024-05-14):

From: The IESG
To: IETF-Announce
Reply-To: last-call@ietf.org
Sender:
Subject: Last Call: Move RFC 7506 to Historic


The IESG has received a request from an individual participant to make the
following status changes:

- RFC7506 from Proposed Standard to Historic
    (IPv6 Router Alert Option for MPLS Operations, Administration, and
    Maintenance (OAM))

The supporting document for this request can be found here:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-mpls-rfc7506-to-historic/

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
last-call@ietf.org mailing lists by 2024-05-14. Exceptionally, comments may
be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

The affected document can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7506/

IESG discussion of this request can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-mpls-rfc7506-to-historic/ballot/


2024-04-16
00 Cindy Morgan RFC Status Change state changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2024-04-16
00 Jim Guichard Last call was requested
2024-04-16
00 Jim Guichard Ballot approval text was generated
2024-04-16
00 Jim Guichard Ballot writeup was generated
2024-04-16
00 Jim Guichard RFC Status Change state changed to Last Call Requested from IESG Evaluation
2024-04-16
00 Jim Guichard Removed from agenda for telechat
2024-04-16
00 Cindy Morgan Last call announcement was generated
2024-04-16
00 Jim Guichard [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jim Guichard
2024-04-16
00 Jim Guichard Created "Approve" ballot
2024-04-16
00 Jim Guichard RFC Status Change state changed to IESG Evaluation from AD Review
2024-04-16
00 Jim Guichard Placed on agenda for telechat - 2024-05-16
2024-04-16
00 Jim Guichard RFC Status Change state changed to AD Review from Needs Shepherd
2024-04-16
00 Jim Guichard New version available: status-change-mpls-rfc7506-to-historic-00.txt