Uplifting RFC5289 from informational to proposed standard
status-change-uplifting-rfc5289-to-ps-00
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2017-03-20
|
00 | Amy Vezza | The following approval message was sent From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce Cc: The IESG , draft-ietf-tls-ecc-new-mac@ietf.org, tls-chairs@ietf.org, … The following approval message was sent From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce Cc: The IESG , draft-ietf-tls-ecc-new-mac@ietf.org, tls-chairs@ietf.org, joe@salowey.net, sean@sn3rd.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: Protocol Action: TLS Elliptic Curve Cipher Suites with SHA-256/384 and AES Galois Counter Mode (GCM) to Proposed Standard The IESG has approved changing the status of the following document: - TLS Elliptic Curve Cipher Suites with SHA-256/384 and AES Galois Counter Mode (GCM) (rfc5289) to Proposed Standard This document action is documented at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-uplifting-rfc5289-to-ps/ A URL of the affected document is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5289/ Status Change Details: As part of the work on TLS1.3 the TLS working group have decided to distinguish standards track ciphersuites from others. Some of the ciphersuites documented in RFC5289 are very widely used yet that RFC is informational, hence this status-change. The working group discussed this a number of times as a part of their changes to how TLS ciphersuites are categorised. The decision to go ahead with the status change is documented in this [1] thread. [1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg21832.html Personnel Stephen Farrell is the responsible Area Director. |
2017-03-20
|
00 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the status change |
2017-03-20
|
00 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2017-03-20
|
00 | Amy Vezza | RFC Status Change state changed to Approved - announcement sent from Approved - announcement to be sent |
2017-03-20
|
00 | Amy Vezza | RFC Status Change state changed to Approved - announcement to be sent from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead |
2017-03-17
|
00 | (System) | RFC Status Change state changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call |
2017-03-16
|
00 | Joel Jaeggli | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli |
2017-03-15
|
00 | Kathleen Moriarty | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty |
2017-03-15
|
00 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko |
2017-03-15
|
00 | Suresh Krishnan | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Suresh Krishnan |
2017-03-15
|
00 | Mirja Kühlewind | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mirja Kühlewind |
2017-03-15
|
00 | Deborah Brungard | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard |
2017-03-15
|
00 | Ben Campbell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ben Campbell |
2017-03-15
|
00 | Alexey Melnikov | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alexey Melnikov |
2017-03-15
|
00 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise |
2017-03-15
|
00 | Alia Atlas | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alia Atlas |
2017-03-15
|
00 | Alvaro Retana | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana |
2017-03-08
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell |
2017-03-08
|
00 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot comment] This seems like a fine thing to do. I am curious about whether there's an intention to uplift other Informational cipher suites RFCs … [Ballot comment] This seems like a fine thing to do. I am curious about whether there's an intention to uplift other Informational cipher suites RFCs to proposed standard - I don't know the topology here, but I do see that we've published Informational RFCs with "cipher suite" in the title, as recently as 2014 (per https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/search/?name=Cipher+suit&rfcs=on). But I'm a No Objection, no matter what the answer is. |
2017-03-08
|
00 | Spencer Dawkins | Ballot comment text updated for Spencer Dawkins |
2017-03-08
|
00 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins |
2017-03-08
|
00 | Amy Vezza | In order to issue a ballot for IESG positioning we moved the document forward in the process before the LC ended. To preserve the state … In order to issue a ballot for IESG positioning we moved the document forward in the process before the LC ended. To preserve the state history, we placed the document back in LC until its original end date (March 17, 2017). |
2017-03-08
|
00 | Amy Vezza | RFC Status Change state changed to In Last Call from IESG Evaluation |
2017-03-08
|
00 | Amy Vezza | Created "Approve" ballot |
2017-03-08
|
00 | Amy Vezza | RFC Status Change state changed to IESG Evaluation from In Last Call |
2017-02-17
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | The following Last Call announcement was sent out: From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Sender: Subject: Last Call: Uplifting RFC5289 from informational to proposed … The following Last Call announcement was sent out: From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Sender: Subject: Last Call: Uplifting RFC5289 from informational to proposed standard The IESG has received a request from an individual participant to make the following status changes: - RFC5289 from Informational to Proposed Standard (TLS Elliptic Curve Cipher Suites with SHA-256/384 and AES Galois Counter Mode (GCM)) The supporting document for this request can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-uplifting-rfc5289-to-ps/ The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2017-03-17. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. The affected document can be obtained via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5289/ IESG discussion of this request can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-uplifting-rfc5289-to-ps/ballot/ |
2017-02-17
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | RFC Status Change state changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested |
2017-02-17
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | Last call was requested |
2017-02-17
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | Ballot approval text was generated |
2017-02-17
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | Ballot writeup was generated |
2017-02-17
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | RFC Status Change state changed to Last Call Requested from AD Review |
2017-02-17
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | Last call announcement was generated |
2017-02-17
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | New version available: status-change-uplifting-rfc5289-to-ps-00.txt |
2017-02-17
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2017-03-16 |