Skip to main content

Uplifting RFC5289 from informational to proposed standard
status-change-uplifting-rfc5289-to-ps-00

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2017-03-20
00 Amy Vezza
The following approval message was sent
From: The IESG
To: IETF-Announce 
Cc: The IESG ,
    draft-ietf-tls-ecc-new-mac@ietf.org,
    tls-chairs@ietf.org,
    …
The following approval message was sent
From: The IESG
To: IETF-Announce 
Cc: The IESG ,
    draft-ietf-tls-ecc-new-mac@ietf.org,
    tls-chairs@ietf.org,
    joe@salowey.net,
    sean@sn3rd.com,
    rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: Protocol Action: TLS Elliptic Curve Cipher Suites with SHA-256/384 and AES Galois Counter Mode (GCM) to Proposed Standard

The IESG has approved changing the status of the following document:
- TLS Elliptic Curve Cipher Suites with SHA-256/384 and AES Galois
Counter Mode (GCM)
  (rfc5289) to Proposed Standard

This document action is documented at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-uplifting-rfc5289-to-ps/

A URL of the affected document is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5289/

Status Change Details:


As part of the work on TLS1.3 the TLS working group have decided
to distinguish standards track ciphersuites from others. Some of
the ciphersuites documented in RFC5289 are very widely used yet
that RFC is informational, hence this status-change.

The working group discussed this a number of times as a part
of their changes to how TLS ciphersuites are categorised. The
decision to go ahead with the status change is documented in
this [1] thread.

[1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg21832.html


Personnel

  Stephen Farrell is the responsible Area Director.



2017-03-20
00 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the status change
2017-03-20
00 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2017-03-20
00 Amy Vezza RFC Status Change state changed to Approved - announcement sent from Approved - announcement to be sent
2017-03-20
00 Amy Vezza RFC Status Change state changed to Approved - announcement to be sent from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2017-03-17
00 (System) RFC Status Change state changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call
2017-03-16
00 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli
2017-03-15
00 Kathleen Moriarty [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty
2017-03-15
00 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2017-03-15
00 Suresh Krishnan [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Suresh Krishnan
2017-03-15
00 Mirja Kühlewind [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mirja Kühlewind
2017-03-15
00 Deborah Brungard [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard
2017-03-15
00 Ben Campbell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ben Campbell
2017-03-15
00 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alexey Melnikov
2017-03-15
00 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2017-03-15
00 Alia Atlas [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alia Atlas
2017-03-15
00 Alvaro Retana [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana
2017-03-08
00 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2017-03-08
00 Spencer Dawkins
[Ballot comment]
This seems like a fine thing to do.

I am curious about whether there's an intention to uplift other Informational cipher suites RFCs …
[Ballot comment]
This seems like a fine thing to do.

I am curious about whether there's an intention to uplift other Informational cipher suites RFCs to proposed standard - I don't know the topology here, but I do see that we've published Informational RFCs with "cipher suite" in the title, as recently as 2014 (per https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/search/?name=Cipher+suit&rfcs=on).

But I'm a No Objection, no matter what the answer is.
2017-03-08
00 Spencer Dawkins Ballot comment text updated for Spencer Dawkins
2017-03-08
00 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins
2017-03-08
00 Amy Vezza
In order to issue a ballot for IESG positioning we moved the document forward in the process before the LC ended. To preserve the state …
In order to issue a ballot for IESG positioning we moved the document forward in the process before the LC ended. To preserve the state history, we placed the document back in LC until its original end date (March 17, 2017).
2017-03-08
00 Amy Vezza RFC Status Change state changed to In Last Call from IESG Evaluation
2017-03-08
00 Amy Vezza Created "Approve" ballot
2017-03-08
00 Amy Vezza RFC Status Change state changed to IESG Evaluation from In Last Call
2017-02-17
00 Cindy Morgan
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG
To: IETF-Announce
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Sender:
Subject: Last Call: Uplifting RFC5289 from informational to proposed …
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG
To: IETF-Announce
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Sender:
Subject: Last Call: Uplifting RFC5289 from informational to proposed standard


The IESG has received a request from an individual participant to make
the following status changes:

- RFC5289 from Informational to Proposed Standard
    (TLS Elliptic Curve Cipher Suites with SHA-256/384 and AES Galois
Counter Mode (GCM))

The supporting document for this request can be found here:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-uplifting-rfc5289-to-ps/

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2017-03-17. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

The affected document can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5289/

IESG discussion of this request can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-uplifting-rfc5289-to-ps/ballot/


2017-02-17
00 Cindy Morgan RFC Status Change state changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2017-02-17
00 Stephen Farrell Last call was requested
2017-02-17
00 Stephen Farrell Ballot approval text was generated
2017-02-17
00 Stephen Farrell Ballot writeup was generated
2017-02-17
00 Stephen Farrell RFC Status Change state changed to Last Call Requested from AD Review
2017-02-17
00 Stephen Farrell Last call announcement was generated
2017-02-17
00 Stephen Farrell New version available: status-change-uplifting-rfc5289-to-ps-00.txt
2017-02-17
00 Stephen Farrell Placed on agenda for telechat - 2017-03-16