Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) extension for recording TE Metric of a Label Switched Path
draft-ietf-ccamp-te-metric-recording-04
Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(teas WG)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Zafar Ali , George Swallow , Clarence Filsfils , Matt Hartley , Kenji Kumaki , Ruediger Kunze | ||
Last updated | 2014-12-08 (Latest revision 2014-08-20) | ||
Replaces | draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording | ||
Replaced by | draft-ietf-teas-te-metric-recording | ||
RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
Stream | WG state | Dead WG Document | |
Document shepherd | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-teas-te-metric-recording | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
There are many scenarios in which Traffic Engineering (TE) metrics such as cost, latency and latency variation associated with a Forwarding Adjacency (FA) or Routing Adjacency (RA) Label Switched Path (LSP) are not available to the ingress and egress nodes. This draft provides extensions for the Resource ReserVation Protocol- Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) for the support of the discovery of cost, latency and latency variation of an LSP.
Authors
Zafar Ali
George Swallow
Clarence Filsfils
Matt Hartley
Kenji Kumaki
Ruediger Kunze
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)