Explicit Flow Measurements Techniques
draft-mdt-ippm-explicit-flow-measurements-02
Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(ippm WG)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Mauro Cociglio , Alexandre Ferrieux , Giuseppe Fioccola , Igor Lubashev , Fabio Bulgarella , Isabelle Hamchaoui , Massimo Nilo , Riccardo Sisto , Dmitri Tikhonov | ||
Last updated | 2021-10-22 (Latest revision 2021-07-12) | ||
Replaces | draft-ferrieuxhamchaoui-tsvwg-lossbits, draft-cfb-ippm-spinbit-measurements | ||
Replaced by | draft-ietf-ippm-explicit-flow-measurements | ||
RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
Stream | WG state | Adopted by a WG | |
Document shepherd | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-ippm-explicit-flow-measurements | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document describes protocol independent methods called Explicit Flow Measurement Techniques that employ few marking bits, inside the header of each packet, for loss and delay measurement. The endpoints, marking the traffic, signal these metrics to intermediate observers allowing them to measure connection performance, and to locate the network segment where impairments happen. Different alternatives are considered within this document. These signaling methods apply to all protocols but they are especially valuable when applied to protocols that encrypt transport header and do not allow traditional methods for delay and loss detection.
Authors
Mauro Cociglio
Alexandre Ferrieux
Giuseppe Fioccola
Igor Lubashev
Fabio Bulgarella
Isabelle Hamchaoui
Massimo Nilo
Riccardo Sisto
Dmitri Tikhonov
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)