Skip to main content

Advertisement of Multiple Paths in BGP: Implementation Report
draft-retana-idr-add-paths-implementation-01

Document Type Replaced Internet-Draft (idr WG)
Expired & archived
Author Alvaro Retana
Last updated 2015-10-14 (Latest revision 2014-11-13)
Replaced by draft-ietf-idr-add-paths-implementation
RFC stream Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
Intended RFC status Informational
Formats
Additional resources Mailing list discussion
Stream WG state WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up
Document shepherd Susan Hares
IESG IESG state Replaced by draft-ietf-idr-add-paths-implementation
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:

Abstract

This document reports the results of an ADD-PATH implementation survey. The survey had 22 questions about implementations' support for advertising multiple paths in BGP. After a brief summary of the results, each response is listed. This document contains responses from six implementers who completed the survey. The editor did not use external means to verify the accuracy of the information submitted by the respondents. The respondents are considered experts on the products they reported on.

Authors

Alvaro Retana

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)