Changes for draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bishttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/2012-08-22T17:02:36+00:00History of change entries for draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis.[(System)] post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sean Turner [rev. 04]2012-08-22T17:02:36+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-296849post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sean Turner[(System)] post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Robert Sparks [rev. 04]2012-08-22T17:02:36+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-296848post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Robert Sparks[(System)] post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Adrian Farrel [rev. 04]2012-08-22T17:02:36+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-296847post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Adrian Farrel[(System)] post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley [rev. 04]2012-08-22T17:02:36+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-296846post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley[(System)] IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor [rev. 04]2011-12-09T04:31:48+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-322998IANA Action state changed to <b>RFC-Ed-Ack</b> from Waiting on RFC Editor[(System)] IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on Authors [rev. 04]2011-12-08T23:09:01+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-322996IANA Action state changed to <b>Waiting on RFC Editor</b> from Waiting on Authors[(System)] IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress [rev. 04]2011-12-08T22:14:46+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-322995IANA Action state changed to <b>Waiting on Authors</b> from In Progress[(System)] IANA Action state changed to In Progress [rev. 04]2011-12-06T23:40:32+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-322984IANA Action state changed to <b>In Progress</b>[Cindy Morgan] State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent. [rev. 04]2011-12-05T23:48:01+00:00Cindy Morganhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-262000State changed to <b>RFC Ed Queue</b> from Approved-announcement sent.[Amy Vezza] IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent [rev. 04]2011-12-05T20:18:31+00:00Amy Vezzahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-363319IESG state changed to <b>Approved-announcement sent</b>[Amy Vezza] IESG has approved the document [rev. 04]2011-12-05T20:18:31+00:00Amy Vezzahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261999IESG has approved the document[Amy Vezza] Closed "Approve" ballot [rev. 04]2011-12-05T20:18:30+00:00Amy Vezzahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-289024Closed &quot;Approve&quot; ballot[Amy Vezza] Approval announcement text regenerated [rev. 04]2011-12-05T20:18:06+00:00Amy Vezzahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261998Approval announcement text regenerated[Cindy Morgan] Removed from agenda for telechat [rev. 04]2011-12-01T19:29:02+00:00Cindy Morganhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261997Removed from agenda for telechat[Cindy Morgan] State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation. [rev. 04]2011-12-01T19:28:32+00:00Cindy Morganhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261996State changed to <b>Approved-announcement to be sent</b> from IESG Evaluation.[(System)] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ralph Droms by IESG … [rev. 04]2011-12-01T17:16:23+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261995[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ralph Droms by IESG Secretary[Dan Romascanu] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded [rev. 04]2011-12-01T15:15:16+00:00Dan Romascanuhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261994[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-04.txt [rev. 04]2011-11-29T23:42:24+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261993New version available: <b>draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-04.txt</b>[Sean Turner] [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss [rev. 04]2011-11-29T21:30:39+00:00Sean Turnerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261992[Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss[Russ Housley] [Ballot discuss] This should be going to Internet Standard under the new process. [rev. 04]2011-11-29T21:25:26+00:00Russ Housleyhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261991[Ballot discuss]<br>This should be going to Internet Standard under the new process.[Russ Housley] [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss [rev. 04]2011-11-29T21:25:26+00:00Russ Housleyhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261990[Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-03.txt [rev. 03]2011-11-29T21:12:29+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261989New version available: <b>draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-03.txt</b>[Robert Sparks] [Ballot Position Update] Position for Robert Sparks has been changed to No Objection from Discuss [rev. 04]2011-11-29T18:39:25+00:00Robert Sparkshttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261988[Ballot Position Update] Position for Robert Sparks has been changed to No Objection from Discuss[Peter Saint-Andre] [Ballot comment] Please retain the part of Appendix B that lists the changes from RFC3462 … [rev. 04]2011-11-29T02:51:40+00:00Peter Saint-Andrehttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261987[Ballot comment]<br>Please retain the part of Appendix B that lists the changes from RFC3462 to this memo.[Stewart Bryant] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded [rev. 04]2011-11-28T17:07:57+00:00Stewart Bryanthttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261986[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded[Pete Resnick] State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead. [rev. 04]2011-11-26T18:52:19+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261985State changed to <b>IESG Evaluation</b> from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.[Stephen Farrell] [Ballot comment] typo: Missing a word in the intro: "message is overly and" [rev. 04]2011-11-26T12:12:02+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261984[Ballot comment]<br>typo:<br><br>Missing a word in the intro: &quot;message is overly and&quot;[(System)] State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call. [rev. 04]2011-11-23T08:18:57+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261983State changed to <b>Waiting for AD Go-Ahead</b> from In Last Call.[Roni Even] Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed. Reviewer: Roni Even. [rev. 04]2011-11-20T17:33:57+00:00Roni Evenhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-683157Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed. Reviewer: Roni Even.[Amanda Baber] IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there are two actions that must be … [rev. 04]2011-11-14T20:03:05+00:00Amanda Baberhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261982IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there are two<br>actions that must be completed.<br><br>First, in the Multipart …[Jean Mahoney] Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Roni Even [rev. 04]2011-11-12T12:54:18+00:00Jean Mahoneyhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-673488Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Roni Even[Jean Mahoney] Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Roni Even [rev. 04]2011-11-12T12:54:18+00:00Jean Mahoneyhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-496621Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Roni Even[Roni Even] Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed. Reviewer: Roni Even. [rev. 04]2011-11-04T23:14:59+00:00Roni Evenhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-683179Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed. Reviewer: Roni Even.[Jean Mahoney] Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Roni Even [rev. 04]2011-11-02T02:43:51+00:00Jean Mahoneyhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-673541Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Roni Even[Jean Mahoney] Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Roni Even [rev. 04]2011-11-02T02:43:51+00:00Jean Mahoneyhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-496544Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Roni Even[Samuel Weiler] Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Brian Weis. [rev. 04]2011-10-28T20:56:22+00:00Samuel Weilerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-683201Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Brian Weis.[Pete Resnick] Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-12-01 [rev. 04]2011-10-27T15:54:47+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261981Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-12-01[Pete Resnick] Removed from agenda for telechat [rev. 04]2011-10-26T19:03:44+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261980Removed from agenda for telechat[Amy Vezza] Last call sent [rev. 04]2011-10-26T18:35:38+00:00Amy Vezzahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-262011Last call sent[Amy Vezza] State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested. The following Last Call Announcement … [rev. 04]2011-10-26T18:35:38+00:00Amy Vezzahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261979State changed to <b>In Last Call</b> from Last Call Requested.<br><br><b>The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:</b><br><br>From: The …[Pete Resnick] Last Call was requested [rev. 04]2011-10-26T18:14:06+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261978Last Call was requested[Pete Resnick] State changed to Last Call Requested from Last Call Requested. [rev. 04]2011-10-26T18:14:06+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261977State changed to <b>Last Call Requested</b> from Last Call Requested.[Pete Resnick] Last Call text changed [rev. 04]2011-10-26T18:14:06+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261976Last Call text changed[Pete Resnick] Last Call text changed [rev. 04]2011-10-26T18:12:52+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261975Last Call text changed[Pete Resnick] Approval announcement text changed [rev. 04]2011-10-26T18:10:39+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261974Approval announcement text changed[Pete Resnick] Approval announcement text changed [rev. 04]2011-10-26T18:10:21+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261973Approval announcement text changed[Pete Resnick] Approval announcement text regenerated [rev. 04]2011-10-26T18:10:04+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261972Approval announcement text regenerated[Pete Resnick] Last Call was requested [rev. 04]2011-10-26T18:09:54+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261971Last Call was requested[Pete Resnick] State changed to Last Call Requested from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup. [rev. 04]2011-10-26T18:09:53+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261970State changed to <b>Last Call Requested</b> from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup.[Pete Resnick] Last Call text changed [rev. 04]2011-10-26T18:09:52+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261969Last Call text changed[Pete Resnick] Ballot has been issued [rev. 04]2011-10-26T18:08:13+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261968Ballot has been issued[Pete Resnick] http://www.ietf.org/iesg/implementation/report-rfc1891-1894.txt was the interoperability report that was used to take 3462 to Draft. [rev. 04]2011-10-26T18:06:37+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261967http://www.ietf.org/iesg/implementation/report-rfc1891-1894.txt was the<br>interoperability report that was used to take 3462 to Draft.<br>[Pete Resnick] Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-12-01 [rev. 04]2011-10-26T18:04:56+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261966Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-12-01[Pete Resnick] Intended Status has been changed to Standard from Draft Standard [rev. 04]2011-10-26T18:04:56+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261965Intended Status has been changed to <b>Standard</b> from <b>Draft Standard</b>[Robert Sparks] [Ballot comment] Please add a note to the tracker history capturing that was the interoperability … [rev. 04]2011-10-20T19:03:28+00:00Robert Sparkshttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261964[Ballot comment]<br>Please add a note to the tracker history capturing that &lt;http://www.ietf.org/iesg/implementation/report-rfc1891-1894.txt&gt; was the interoperability report that was used …[Robert Sparks] [Ballot discuss] I encourage advancing this under RFC6410. [rev. 04]2011-10-20T19:03:28+00:00Robert Sparkshttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261963[Ballot discuss]<br>I encourage advancing this under RFC6410.[Cindy Morgan] Removed from agenda for telechat [rev. 04]2011-10-20T17:50:48+00:00Cindy Morganhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261962Removed from agenda for telechat[Cindy Morgan] State changed to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation. [rev. 04]2011-10-20T17:48:39+00:00Cindy Morganhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261961State changed to <b>IESG Evaluation::AD Followup</b> from IESG Evaluation.[Amy Vezza] Ballot writeup text changed [rev. 04]2011-10-20T14:37:53+00:00Amy Vezzahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261960Ballot writeup text changed[Gonzalo Camarillo] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded [rev. 04]2011-10-20T13:13:39+00:00Gonzalo Camarillohttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261959[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded[Jari Arkko] [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded [rev. 04]2011-10-20T11:19:35+00:00Jari Arkkohttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261958[Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded[Peter Saint-Andre] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded [rev. 04]2011-10-19T21:52:59+00:00Peter Saint-Andrehttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261957[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded[Ron Bonica] [Ballot comment] Concur with Russ' discuss. [rev. 04]2011-10-19T19:40:58+00:00Ron Bonicahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261956[Ballot comment]<br>Concur with Russ&#x27; discuss.[Ron Bonica] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded [rev. 04]2011-10-19T19:40:58+00:00Ron Bonicahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261955[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded[Sean Turner] [Ballot comment] #1) Do the authors also wish to make RFC 3462 and or 1892 … [rev. 04]2011-10-18T19:48:10+00:00Sean Turnerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261954[Ballot comment]<br>#1) Do the authors also wish to make RFC 3462 and or 1892 Historic?<br><br>#2) I&#x27;ll leave it …[Sean Turner] [Ballot discuss] Updated based on -02. #1) The authors are contacting the authors of 3462 … [rev. 04]2011-10-18T19:48:10+00:00Sean Turnerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261953[Ballot discuss]<br>Updated based on -02.<br><br>&lt;process weenie&gt;<br><br>#1) The authors are contacting the authors of 3462 - so I …[Robert Sparks] [Ballot discuss] I encourage advancing this under RFC6410. That change to the process no longer … [rev. 04]2011-10-18T19:20:00+00:00Robert Sparkshttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261952[Ballot discuss]<br>I encourage advancing this under RFC6410.<br><br>That change to the process no longer _requires_ an implementation report, but …[Robert Sparks] [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded [rev. 04]2011-10-18T19:20:00+00:00Robert Sparkshttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261951[Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-02.txt [rev. 02]2011-10-18T19:16:15+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261950New version available: <b>draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-02.txt</b>[Adrian Farrel] [Ballot comment] Cleared my Discuss after discussion [rev. 04]2011-10-18T08:57:44+00:00Adrian Farrelhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261949[Ballot comment]<br>Cleared my Discuss after discussion[Adrian Farrel] [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to No Objection from Discuss [rev. 04]2011-10-18T08:57:44+00:00Adrian Farrelhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261948[Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to No Objection from Discuss[Adrian Farrel] [Ballot discuss] For discussion... RFC 5337 section 4 updates RFC 3462. Has that change been … [rev. 04]2011-10-17T22:05:58+00:00Adrian Farrelhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261947[Ballot discuss]<br>For discussion...<br><br>RFC 5337 section 4 updates RFC 3462. Has that change been reflected into this document? If …[Adrian Farrel] [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded [rev. 04]2011-10-17T22:05:58+00:00Adrian Farrelhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261946[Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded[David Harrington] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded [rev. 04]2011-10-17T20:47:08+00:00David Harringtonhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261945[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded[Russ Housley] [Ballot discuss] This should be going to Internet Standard under the new process. [rev. 04]2011-10-17T20:42:32+00:00Russ Housleyhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261944[Ballot discuss]<br>This should be going to Internet Standard under the new process.[Russ Housley] [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded [rev. 04]2011-10-17T20:42:30+00:00Russ Housleyhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261943[Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded[Sean Turner] [Ballot comment] #1) Do the authors also wish to make RFC 3462 and or 1892 … [rev. 04]2011-10-16T16:36:37+00:00Sean Turnerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261942[Ballot comment]<br>#1) Do the authors also wish to make RFC 3462 and or 1892 Historic?[Sean Turner] [Ballot discuss] #1) I'm hoping the answer to this is yes, but I had to … [rev. 04]2011-10-16T16:36:37+00:00Sean Turnerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261941[Ballot discuss]<br>&lt;process weenie&gt;<br><br>#1) I&#x27;m hoping the answer to this is yes, but I had to ask because I …[Sean Turner] [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded [rev. 04]2011-10-16T16:36:37+00:00Sean Turnerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261940[Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded[Pete Resnick] State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead. [rev. 04]2011-10-13T05:22:58+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261939State changed to <b>IESG Evaluation</b> from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.[Stephen Farrell] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded [rev. 04]2011-10-12T16:17:33+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261938[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded[Wesley Eddy] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded [rev. 04]2011-10-11T19:26:57+00:00Wesley Eddyhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261937[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded[Samuel Weiler] Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Brian Weis [rev. 04]2011-10-11T00:28:58+00:00Samuel Weilerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-673599Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Brian Weis[Samuel Weiler] Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Brian Weis [rev. 04]2011-10-11T00:28:58+00:00Samuel Weilerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-504461Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Brian Weis[Amanda Baber] Upon approval of this document, IANA will replace the references for the following media types … [rev. 04]2011-10-10T21:28:00+00:00Amanda Baberhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261936Upon approval of this document, IANA will replace the references for the<br>following media types with references to this document: …[(System)] State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call. [rev. 04]2011-10-10T07:19:44+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261935State changed to <b>Waiting for AD Go-Ahead</b> from In Last Call.[Amy Vezza] State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested. The following Last Call Announcement … [rev. 04]2011-09-26T14:05:08+00:00Amy Vezzahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261934State changed to <b>In Last Call</b> from Last Call Requested.<br><br><b>The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:</b><br><br>From: The …[Pete Resnick] Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-10-20 [rev. 04]2011-09-26T09:11:52+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261933Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-10-20[Pete Resnick] [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Pete Resnick [rev. 04]2011-09-26T09:11:23+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261932[Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Pete Resnick[Pete Resnick] Ballot has been issued [rev. 04]2011-09-26T09:11:23+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261931Ballot has been issued[Pete Resnick] Created "Approve" ballot [rev. 04]2011-09-26T09:11:22+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-289023Created &quot;Approve&quot; ballot[Pete Resnick] Last Call was requested [rev. 04]2011-09-26T09:10:29+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261930Last Call was requested[(System)] Ballot writeup text was added [rev. 04]2011-09-26T09:10:28+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-262004Ballot writeup text was added[(System)] Last call text was added [rev. 04]2011-09-26T09:10:28+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-262003Last call text was added[(System)] Ballot approval text was added [rev. 04]2011-09-26T09:10:28+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-262002Ballot approval text was added[Pete Resnick] State changed to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested. [rev. 04]2011-09-26T09:10:18+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261929State changed to <b>Last Call Requested</b> from Publication Requested.[Pete Resnick] Last Call text changed [rev. 04]2011-09-26T09:10:18+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261928Last Call text changed[Pete Resnick] Approval announcement text regenerated [rev. 04]2011-09-26T09:09:45+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261927Approval announcement text regenerated[Pete Resnick] Ballot writeup text changed [rev. 04]2011-09-26T09:09:19+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261926Ballot writeup text changed[Pete Resnick] Ballot writeup text changed [rev. 04]2011-09-26T09:07:45+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261925Ballot writeup text changed[Pete Resnick] PROTO writeup for draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-01 The Applications Area Working Group requests the publication of draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-01 as … [rev. 04]2011-09-26T09:04:40+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261924PROTO writeup for draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-01 <br><br>The Applications Area Working Group requests the publication of draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-01 as a Draft Standard, replacing RFC …[Pete Resnick] State changed to Publication Requested from AD is watching. [rev. 04]2011-09-22T15:50:37+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261923State changed to <b>Publication Requested</b> from AD is watching.[Barry Leiba] WGLC ended; new version submitted; ready to go [rev. 04]2011-09-22T12:27:31+00:00Barry Leibahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-262009WGLC ended; new version submitted; ready to go[Barry Leiba] IETF state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from In WG Last Call [rev. 04]2011-09-22T12:27:31+00:00Barry Leibahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-262008IETF state changed to <b>Submitted to IESG for Publication</b> from In WG Last Call[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-01.txt [rev. 01]2011-09-22T05:33:51+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261922New version available: <b>draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-01.txt</b>[Barry Leiba] Changed protocol writeup [rev. 04]2011-09-15T18:30:57+00:00Barry Leibahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-262010Changed protocol writeup[Barry Leiba] WGLC ends on 21 September [rev. 04]2011-09-14T17:19:24+00:00Barry Leibahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-262007WGLC ends on 21 September[Barry Leiba] IETF state changed to In WG Last Call from WG Document [rev. 04]2011-09-14T17:19:24+00:00Barry Leibahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-262006IETF state changed to <b>In WG Last Call</b> from WG Document[Pete Resnick] Draft added in state AD is watching [rev. 04]2011-09-07T20:11:09+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-261921Draft added in state AD is watching[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-00.txt [rev. 00]2011-08-30T07:00:00+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis/history/#history-262005New version available: <b>draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-00.txt</b>