Changes for draft-ietf-dane-protocolhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/2012-07-07T01:13:04+00:00History of change entries for draft-ietf-dane-protocol.[(System)] IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor [rev. 23]2012-07-07T01:13:04+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-323609IANA Action state changed to <b>RFC-Ed-Ack</b> from Waiting on RFC Editor[(System)] IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress [rev. 23]2012-07-06T00:43:00+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-323607IANA Action state changed to <b>Waiting on RFC Editor</b> from In Progress[(System)] IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors [rev. 23]2012-07-06T00:28:18+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-323606IANA Action state changed to <b>In Progress</b> from Waiting on Authors[(System)] IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress [rev. 23]2012-07-01T06:01:09+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-323602IANA Action state changed to <b>Waiting on Authors</b> from In Progress[(System)] IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors [rev. 23]2012-06-29T01:57:29+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-323601IANA Action state changed to <b>In Progress</b> from Waiting on Authors[(System)] IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress [rev. 23]2012-06-28T21:58:47+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-323600IANA Action state changed to <b>Waiting on Authors</b> from In Progress[Cindy Morgan] State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent [rev. 23]2012-06-18T16:40:32+00:00Cindy Morganhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-289782State changed to <b>RFC Ed Queue</b> from Approved-announcement sent[(System)] IANA Action state changed to In Progress [rev. 23]2012-06-15T18:01:59+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-323585IANA Action state changed to <b>In Progress</b>[Amy Vezza] State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent [rev. 23]2012-06-15T12:12:39+00:00Amy Vezzahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-289607State changed to <b>Approved-announcement sent</b> from Approved-announcement to be sent[Amy Vezza] IESG has approved the document [rev. 23]2012-06-15T12:12:39+00:00Amy Vezzahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-289606IESG has approved the document[Amy Vezza] Closed "Approve" ballot [rev. 23]2012-06-15T12:12:39+00:00Amy Vezzahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-289605Closed &quot;Approve&quot; ballot[Amy Vezza] Ballot approval text was generated [rev. 23]2012-06-15T12:12:03+00:00Amy Vezzahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-289604Ballot approval text was generated[Amy Vezza] Ballot writeup was changed [rev. 23]2012-06-15T12:11:49+00:00Amy Vezzahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-289603Ballot writeup was changed[Amy Vezza] State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup [rev. 23]2012-06-15T12:11:34+00:00Amy Vezzahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-289602State changed to <b>Approved-announcement to be sent</b> from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup[Sean Turner] [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to Yes from No Objection [rev. 23]2012-06-15T10:49:29+00:00Sean Turnerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-289599[Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to Yes from No Objection[Sean Turner] [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss [rev. 23]2012-06-15T10:49:12+00:00Sean Turnerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-289598[Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss[Paul Hoffman] New version available: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-23.txt [rev. 23]2012-06-14T21:36:57+00:00Paul Hoffmanhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-289559New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dane-protocol-23.txt</b>[Russ Housley] [Ballot comment] Section 1.3 says: > > This document only applies to PKIX [RFC5280] certificates, … [rev. 22]2012-06-14T20:38:33+00:00Russ Housleyhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-289550[Ballot comment]<br> Section 1.3 says:<br> &gt;<br> &gt; This document only applies to PKIX [RFC5280] certificates, not<br> …[Russ Housley] [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss [rev. 22]2012-06-14T20:38:33+00:00Russ Housleyhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-289549[Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss[(System)] Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed [rev. 22]2012-06-14T20:13:30+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-289548Sub state has been changed to <b>AD Followup</b> from <b>Revised ID Needed</b>[Paul Hoffman] New version available: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-22.txt [rev. 22]2012-06-14T20:13:29+00:00Paul Hoffmanhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-289547New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dane-protocol-22.txt</b>[Sean Turner] [Ballot discuss] Updated based on exchanges with Paul. 1) Don't you need to specify how … [rev. 21]2012-06-11T13:22:38+00:00Sean Turnerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-283310[Ballot discuss]<br>Updated based on exchanges with Paul.<br><br>1) Don&#x27;t you need to specify how SPKI is encoded:<br><br> The …[Sean Turner] Ballot discuss text updated for Sean Turner [rev. 21]2012-06-11T13:22:38+00:00Sean Turnerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-283309Ballot discuss text updated for Sean Turner[Cindy Morgan] State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation [rev. 21]2012-06-07T18:14:01+00:00Cindy Morganhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-283173State changed to <b>IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed</b> from IESG Evaluation[Adrian Farrel] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel [rev. 21]2012-06-07T15:15:21+00:00Adrian Farrelhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-283160[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel[Sean Turner] [Ballot discuss] 1) Don't you need to specify how SPKI is encoded: The SubjectPublicKeyInfo is … [rev. 21]2012-06-07T15:04:54+00:00Sean Turnerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-283159[Ballot discuss]<br>1) Don&#x27;t you need to specify how SPKI is encoded:<br><br> The SubjectPublicKeyInfo is a binary structure defined …[Sean Turner] [Ballot comment] 1) s1: Probably splitting hairs, but I think the certificate isn't the key … [rev. 21]2012-06-07T15:04:54+00:00Sean Turnerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-283158[Ballot comment]<br>1) s1: Probably splitting hairs, but I think the certificate isn&#x27;t the key - it&#x27;s that the key …[Sean Turner] Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Sean Turner [rev. 21]2012-06-07T15:04:54+00:00Sean Turnerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-283157Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Sean Turner[Sean Turner] [Ballot discuss] 1) Don't you need to specify how SPKI is encoded: The SubjectPublicKeyInfo is … [rev. 21]2012-06-07T14:50:52+00:00Sean Turnerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-283156[Ballot discuss]<br>1) Don&#x27;t you need to specify how SPKI is encoded:<br><br> The SubjectPublicKeyInfo is a binary structure defined …[Sean Turner] [Ballot comment] 1) s1: Probably splitting hairs, but I think the certificate isn't the key … [rev. 21]2012-06-07T14:50:52+00:00Sean Turnerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-283155[Ballot comment]<br>1) s1: Probably splitting hairs, but I think the certificate isn&#x27;t the key - it&#x27;s that the key …[Sean Turner] [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Sean Turner [rev. 21]2012-06-07T14:50:52+00:00Sean Turnerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-283154[Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Sean Turner[Stewart Bryant] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant [rev. 21]2012-06-07T08:44:05+00:00Stewart Bryanthttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-283131[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant[Benoît Claise] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise [rev. 21]2012-06-07T00:45:33+00:00Benoît Claisehttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-283096[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise[Pete Resnick] [Ballot comment] In general, I find section 3 wrongheaded. I think it was a poor … [rev. 21]2012-06-07T00:44:52+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-283095[Ballot comment]<br>In general, I find section 3 wrongheaded. I think it was a poor design choice to use _port._protocol.rest.of.name. …[Pete Resnick] [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded for Pete Resnick [rev. 21]2012-06-07T00:44:52+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-283094[Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded for Pete Resnick[Wesley Eddy] [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Wesley Eddy [rev. 21]2012-06-07T00:42:53+00:00Wesley Eddyhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-283092[Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Wesley Eddy[Russ Housley] [Ballot discuss] Please add a description of Full Certificate to Section 2.1.2. I suggest: "Using … [rev. 21]2012-06-06T21:31:00+00:00Russ Housleyhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-283072[Ballot discuss]<br><br> Please add a description of Full Certificate to Section 2.1.2. I<br> suggest: &quot;Using the Certificate binary …[Russ Housley] [Ballot comment] Section 1.3 says: > > This document only applies to PKIX [RFC5280] certificates, … [rev. 21]2012-06-06T21:31:00+00:00Russ Housleyhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-283071[Ballot comment]<br><br> Section 1.3 says:<br> &gt;<br> &gt; This document only applies to PKIX [RFC5280] certificates, not<br> …[Russ Housley] [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Russ Housley [rev. 21]2012-06-06T21:31:00+00:00Russ Housleyhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-283070[Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Russ Housley[Gonzalo Camarillo] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo [rev. 21]2012-06-06T10:34:57+00:00Gonzalo Camarillohttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-282963[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo[Barry Leiba] [Ballot comment] Substantive comments; these are non-blocking, but please consider them seriously, and feel free … [rev. 21]2012-06-06T07:02:27+00:00Barry Leibahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-282948[Ballot comment]<br>Substantive comments; these are non-blocking, but please consider them<br>seriously, and feel free to chat with me about …[Barry Leiba] [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Barry Leiba [rev. 21]2012-06-06T07:02:27+00:00Barry Leibahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-282947[Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Barry Leiba[Robert Sparks] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Robert Sparks [rev. 21]2012-06-05T21:26:03+00:00Robert Sparkshttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-282895[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Robert Sparks[Brian Haberman] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman [rev. 21]2012-06-05T20:05:26+00:00Brian Habermanhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-282880[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman[Ralph Droms] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ralph Droms [rev. 21]2012-06-05T15:51:09+00:00Ralph Dromshttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-282839[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ralph Droms[Martin Stiemerling] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling [rev. 21]2012-06-05T12:30:04+00:00Martin Stiemerlinghttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-282809[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling[Miguel García] Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed. Reviewer: Miguel Garcia. [rev. 21]2012-06-04T20:41:26+00:00Miguel Garcíahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-682843Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed. Reviewer: Miguel Garcia.[Ron Bonica] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica [rev. 21]2012-06-04T16:33:55+00:00Ron Bonicahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-282706[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica[Stephen Farrell] State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead [rev. 21]2012-06-01T14:53:40+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-282551State changed to <b>IESG Evaluation</b> from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead[(System)] State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call [rev. 21]2012-05-31T07:21:47+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-282430State changed to <b>Waiting for AD Go-Ahead</b> from In Last Call[Stephen Farrell] Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-06-07 [rev. 21]2012-05-18T17:33:05+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-281379Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-06-07[Jean Mahoney] Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Miguel Garcia [rev. 21]2012-05-18T04:56:26+00:00Jean Mahoneyhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-673046Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Miguel Garcia[Jean Mahoney] Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Miguel Garcia [rev. 21]2012-05-18T04:56:26+00:00Jean Mahoneyhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-497097Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Miguel Garcia[Cindy Morgan] The following Last Call announcement was sent out:From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce CC: Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org … [rev. 21]2012-05-17T21:02:20+00:00Cindy Morganhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-281314The following Last Call announcement was sent out:<br><br>From: The IESG &lt;iesg-secretary@ietf.org&gt;<br>To: IETF-Announce &lt;ietf-announce@ietf.org&gt;<br>CC: &lt;dane@ietf.org&gt;<br>Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org<br>Subject: Last …[Cindy Morgan] State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested [rev. 21]2012-05-17T21:02:19+00:00Cindy Morganhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-281313State changed to <b>In Last Call</b> from Last Call Requested[Stephen Farrell] Last call was requested [rev. 21]2012-05-17T20:55:07+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-281308Last call was requested[Stephen Farrell] State changed to Last Call Requested from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::AD Followup [rev. 21]2012-05-17T20:55:06+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-281307State changed to <b>Last Call Requested</b> from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::AD Followup[Stephen Farrell] Last call announcement was changed [rev. 21]2012-05-17T20:55:06+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-281306Last call announcement was changed[Stephen Farrell] Last call announcement was generated [rev. 21]2012-05-17T20:54:14+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-281305Last call announcement was generated[Stephen Farrell] Last call announcement was changed [rev. 21]2012-05-17T20:20:07+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-281297Last call announcement was changed[Stephen Farrell] Last call announcement was generated [rev. 21]2012-05-17T20:16:52+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-281296Last call announcement was generated[(System)] Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed [rev. 21]2012-05-17T17:30:16+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-281271Sub state has been changed to <b>AD Followup</b> from <b>Revised ID Needed</b>[Paul Hoffman] New version available: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-21.txt [rev. 21]2012-05-17T17:30:16+00:00Paul Hoffmanhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-281270New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dane-protocol-21.txt</b>[Stephen Farrell] State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::AD Followup [rev. 20]2012-05-10T12:39:20+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-280692State changed to <b>Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised ID Needed</b> from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::AD Followup[Samuel Weiler] Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Catherine Meadows. [rev. 20]2012-05-04T22:35:42+00:00Samuel Weilerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-682886Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Catherine Meadows.[(System)] Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed [rev. 20]2012-04-29T23:40:44+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-279757Sub state has been changed to <b>AD Followup</b> from <b>Revised ID Needed</b>[Paul Hoffman] New version available: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-20.txt [rev. 20]2012-04-29T23:40:44+00:00Paul Hoffmanhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-279756New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dane-protocol-20.txt</b>[Stephen Farrell] State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead [rev. 19]2012-04-26T14:55:37+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-279565State changed to <b>Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised ID Needed</b> from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead[(System)] State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call [rev. 19]2012-04-25T07:21:41+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-279343State changed to <b>Waiting for AD Go-Ahead</b> from In Last Call[Miguel García] Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Miguel Garcia. [rev. 19]2012-04-24T13:52:35+00:00Miguel Garcíahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-682901Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Miguel Garcia.[Samuel Weiler] Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Catherine Meadows [rev. 19]2012-04-22T20:12:11+00:00Samuel Weilerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-673088Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Catherine Meadows[Samuel Weiler] Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Catherine Meadows [rev. 19]2012-04-22T20:12:11+00:00Samuel Weilerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-504791Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Catherine Meadows[Samuel Weiler] Assignment of request for Last Call review by SECDIR to Barry Leiba was rejected [rev. 19]2012-04-22T20:11:59+00:00Samuel Weilerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-682909Assignment of request for Last Call review by SECDIR to Barry Leiba was rejected[Samuel Weiler] Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Barry Leiba [rev. 19]2012-04-22T18:09:21+00:00Samuel Weilerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-673091Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Barry Leiba[Samuel Weiler] Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Barry Leiba [rev. 19]2012-04-22T18:09:21+00:00Samuel Weilerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-504785Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Barry Leiba[Samuel Weiler] Assignment of request for Last Call review by SECDIR to Warren Kumari was rejected [rev. 19]2012-04-22T18:08:27+00:00Samuel Weilerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-682913Assignment of request for Last Call review by SECDIR to Warren Kumari was rejected[Pearl Liang] IESG: IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt and has the following comments: IANA understands that, upon approval … [rev. 19]2012-04-19T00:14:56+00:00Pearl Lianghttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-278754IESG:<br><br>IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt and has the following comments:<br><br>IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there are …[Jean Mahoney] Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Miguel Garcia [rev. 19]2012-04-13T05:41:47+00:00Jean Mahoneyhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-673105Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Miguel Garcia[Jean Mahoney] Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Miguel Garcia [rev. 19]2012-04-13T05:41:47+00:00Jean Mahoneyhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-497027Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Miguel Garcia[Samuel Weiler] Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Warren Kumari [rev. 19]2012-04-13T02:47:37+00:00Samuel Weilerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-673108Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Warren Kumari[Samuel Weiler] Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Warren Kumari [rev. 19]2012-04-13T02:47:37+00:00Samuel Weilerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-504779Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Warren Kumari[Cindy Morgan] Last call sent [rev. 19]2012-04-12T01:41:28+00:00Cindy Morganhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-278266Last call sent[Cindy Morgan] State changed to In Last Call from Last Call RequestedThe following Last Call Announcement was … [rev. 19]2012-04-12T01:41:27+00:00Cindy Morganhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-278265State changed to <b>In Last Call</b> from Last Call Requested<br><br><b>The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:</b><br><br>From: The IESG &lt;iesg-secretary@ietf.org&gt;<br><br>To: …[Stephen Farrell] Last call was requested [rev. 19]2012-04-12T01:16:01+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-278264Last call was requested[Stephen Farrell] State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation [rev. 19]2012-04-12T01:16:01+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-278263State changed to <b>Last Call Requested</b> from AD Evaluation[Stephen Farrell] Last call announcement was generated [rev. 19]2012-04-12T01:15:49+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-278262Last call announcement was generated[Stephen Farrell] State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested [rev. 19]2012-04-12T01:15:42+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-278261State changed to <b>AD Evaluation</b> from Publication Requested[Stephen Farrell] State changed to Publication Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup [rev. 19]2012-04-12T01:15:28+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-278260State changed to <b>Publication Requested</b> from AD Evaluation::AD Followup[Stephen Farrell] Ballot has been issued [rev. 19]2012-04-12T01:15:00+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-278259Ballot has been issued[Stephen Farrell] Ballot approval text was generated [rev. 19]2012-04-12T01:15:00+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-278258Ballot approval text was generated[Stephen Farrell] [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell [rev. 19]2012-04-12T01:15:00+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-278257[Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell[Stephen Farrell] Ballot writeup was changed [rev. 19]2012-04-12T01:15:00+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-278256Ballot writeup was changed[Stephen Farrell] Created "Approve" ballot [rev. 19]2012-04-12T01:14:59+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-289151Created &quot;Approve&quot; ballot[Stephen Farrell] Ballot writeup was generated [rev. 19]2012-04-12T01:13:20+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-278255Ballot writeup was generated[(System)] Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed [rev. 19]2012-04-11T21:36:47+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-278243Sub state has been changed to <b>AD Followup</b> from <b>Revised ID Needed</b>[Paul Hoffman] New version available: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt [rev. 19]2012-04-11T21:36:47+00:00Paul Hoffmanhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-278242New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt</b>[Stephen Farrell] State changed to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation [rev. 18]2012-04-09T15:25:48+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-277906State changed to <b>AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed</b> from AD Evaluation[Stephen Farrell] State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested [rev. 18]2012-03-20T12:30:03+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-275312State changed to <b>AD Evaluation</b> from Publication Requested[Cindy Morgan] (1) What type of RFC is being requested... This document is requested to be published … [rev. 18]2012-03-12T21:01:57+00:00Cindy Morganhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-274386(1) What type of RFC is being requested...<br><br><br>This document is requested to be published as Proposed Standard.<br>The title …[Cindy Morgan] Note added 'Warren Kumari (warren@kumari.net) is acting as the Document Shepherd. ' [rev. 18]2012-03-12T21:01:28+00:00Cindy Morganhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-274385Note added &#x27;Warren Kumari (warren@kumari.net) is acting as the Document Shepherd. &#x27;[Cindy Morgan] Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard [rev. 18]2012-03-12T21:01:28+00:00Cindy Morganhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-274384Intended Status changed to <b>Proposed Standard</b>[Cindy Morgan] IESG process started in state Publication Requested [rev. 18]2012-03-12T21:01:28+00:00Cindy Morganhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-274383IESG process started in state <b>Publication Requested</b>[Warren Kumari] IETF state changed to WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up from WG Document [rev. 18]2012-03-12T20:49:36+00:00Warren Kumarihttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-274380IETF state changed to <b>WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up</b> from WG Document[Warren Kumari] Done! [rev. 18]2012-03-12T20:48:12+00:00Warren Kumarihttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-274381Done![Warren Kumari] Changed shepherd to Warren Kumari [rev. 18]2012-03-12T20:48:12+00:00Warren Kumarihttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-274378Changed shepherd to Warren Kumari[Jakob Schlyter] New version available: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-18.txt [rev. 18]2012-03-09T17:46:59+00:00Jakob Schlyterhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-273855New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dane-protocol-18.txt</b>[Paul Hoffman] New version available: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-17.txt [rev. 17]2012-02-29T15:47:23+00:00Paul Hoffmanhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-272631New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dane-protocol-17.txt</b>[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16.txt [rev. 16]2012-02-08T08:00:16+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-254343New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dane-protocol-16.txt</b>[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt [rev. 15]2012-02-04T08:00:15+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-254342New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dane-protocol-15.txt</b>[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14.txt [rev. 14]2012-01-04T08:00:14+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-254341New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14.txt</b>[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-13.txt [rev. 13]2011-12-19T08:00:13+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-254340New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dane-protocol-13.txt</b>[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-12.txt [rev. 12]2011-09-27T07:00:12+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-254339New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dane-protocol-12.txt</b>[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-11.txt [rev. 11]2011-09-08T07:00:11+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-254338New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dane-protocol-11.txt</b>[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-10.txt [rev. 10]2011-08-15T07:00:10+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-254337New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dane-protocol-10.txt</b>[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-09.txt [rev. 09]2011-07-25T07:00:09+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-254336New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dane-protocol-09.txt</b>[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-08.txt [rev. 08]2011-07-01T07:00:08+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-254335New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dane-protocol-08.txt</b>[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-07.txt [rev. 07]2011-06-03T07:00:07+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-254334New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dane-protocol-07.txt</b>[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-06.txt [rev. 06]2011-03-12T08:00:06+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-254333New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dane-protocol-06.txt</b>[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-05.txt [rev. 05]2011-02-23T08:00:05+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-254332New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dane-protocol-05.txt</b>[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-04.txt [rev. 04]2011-02-10T08:00:04+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-254331New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dane-protocol-04.txt</b>[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-03.txt [rev. 03]2011-01-25T08:00:03+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-254330New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dane-protocol-03.txt</b>[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-02.txt [rev. 02]2011-01-15T08:00:02+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-254329New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dane-protocol-02.txt</b>[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-01.txt [rev. 01]2011-01-08T08:00:01+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-254328New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dane-protocol-01.txt</b>[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-00.txt [rev. 00]2010-12-13T08:00:00+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-protocol/history/#history-254327New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dane-protocol-00.txt</b>