Changes for draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameterhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/2012-08-22T17:07:45+00:00History of change entries for draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter.[(System)] post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sean Turner [rev. 11]2012-08-22T17:07:45+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-300259post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sean Turner[(System)] post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Jari Arkko [rev. 11]2012-08-22T17:07:45+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-300258post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Jari Arkko[(System)] post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Stephen Farrell [rev. 11]2012-08-22T17:07:45+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-300257post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Stephen Farrell[(System)] post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley [rev. 11]2012-08-22T17:07:45+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-300256post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley[Benoît Claise] Ballot writeup was changed [rev. 11]2012-05-08T08:42:34+00:00Benoît Claisehttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-280416Ballot writeup was changed[Benoît Claise] Responsible AD changed to Benoit Claise from Dan Romascanu [rev. 11]2012-03-29T17:47:41+00:00Benoît Claisehttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-277409Responsible AD changed to <b>Benoit Claise</b> from <b>Dan Romascanu</b>[(System)] IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor [rev. 11]2012-01-09T22:33:25+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-323078IANA Action state changed to <b>RFC-Ed-Ack</b> from Waiting on RFC Editor[(System)] IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on Authors [rev. 11]2012-01-09T21:30:24+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-323077IANA Action state changed to <b>Waiting on RFC Editor</b> from Waiting on Authors[(System)] IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress [rev. 11]2012-01-06T22:51:31+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-323073IANA Action state changed to <b>Waiting on Authors</b> from In Progress[Cindy Morgan] State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent. [rev. 11]2012-01-05T18:41:05+00:00Cindy Morganhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237523State changed to <b>RFC Ed Queue</b> from Approved-announcement sent.[(System)] IANA Action state changed to In Progress [rev. 11]2012-01-04T21:37:24+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-323064IANA Action state changed to <b>In Progress</b>[Amy Vezza] IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent [rev. 11]2012-01-04T15:52:33+00:00Amy Vezzahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-363073IESG state changed to <b>Approved-announcement sent</b>[Amy Vezza] IESG has approved the document [rev. 11]2012-01-04T15:52:33+00:00Amy Vezzahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237522IESG has approved the document[Amy Vezza] Closed "Approve" ballot [rev. 11]2012-01-04T15:52:32+00:00Amy Vezzahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-288482Closed &quot;Approve&quot; ballot[Amy Vezza] Approval announcement text regenerated [rev. 11]2012-01-04T15:52:18+00:00Amy Vezzahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237521Approval announcement text regenerated[Amy Vezza] Ballot writeup text changed [rev. 11]2012-01-04T15:51:58+00:00Amy Vezzahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237520Ballot writeup text changed[Amy Vezza] State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup. [rev. 11]2012-01-04T15:50:54+00:00Amy Vezzahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237519State changed to <b>Approved-announcement to be sent</b> from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup.[Stephen Farrell] [Ballot comment] You may want to check the language where you did the PSK/shared key … [rev. 11]2011-11-14T06:32:19+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237518[Ballot comment]<br>You may want to check the language where you did the PSK/shared key<br>substitutions.[Stephen Farrell] [Ballot discuss] After needed prodding, I've had a look at -10 of this wrt my … [rev. 11]2011-11-14T06:32:19+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237517[Ballot discuss]<br>After needed prodding, I&#x27;ve had a look at -10 of this wrt my<br>remaining discusses and I&#x27;m now …[Stephen Farrell] [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to No Objection from Discuss [rev. 11]2011-11-14T06:32:19+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237516[Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to No Objection from Discuss[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-11.txt [rev. 11]2011-11-14T01:25:51+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237515New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-11.txt</b>[Jari Arkko] [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to No Objection from Discuss [rev. 11]2011-10-29T17:50:17+00:00Jari Arkkohttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237514[Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to No Objection from Discuss[Stephen Farrell] [Ballot comment] "It is expected..." in the security considerations is no longer correct. If you're … [rev. 11]2011-10-29T16:03:30+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237513[Ballot comment]<br>&quot;It is expected...&quot; in the security considerations is no longer<br>correct. If you&#x27;re using the Key AVP then …[Stephen Farrell] [Ballot discuss] After needed prodding, I've had a look at -10 of this wrt my … [rev. 11]2011-10-29T16:03:30+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237512[Ballot discuss]<br>After needed prodding, I&#x27;ve had a look at -10 of this wrt my<br>remaining discusses and I&#x27;m now …[Russ Housley] [Ballot discuss] The Gen-ART Review by Ben Campbell on 3-Jun-2011 raised an important interoperability question. … [rev. 11]2011-09-26T20:15:11+00:00Russ Housleyhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237511[Ballot discuss]<br>The Gen-ART Review by Ben Campbell on 3-Jun-2011 raised an important<br> interoperability question. Ben pointed out that …[Russ Housley] [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss [rev. 11]2011-09-26T20:15:11+00:00Russ Housleyhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237510[Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-10.txt [rev. 10]2011-09-12T20:40:33+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237509New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-10.txt</b>[Stephen Farrell] [Ballot discuss] --- two more parts of this were obviously cleared (what were discuss points … [rev. 11]2011-08-26T15:00:35+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237508[Ballot discuss]<br>--- two more parts of this were obviously cleared (what were discuss<br>points 1 &amp; 8); I&#x27;ll look …[Sean Turner] [Ballot comment] I moved my discuss to a comment: I support Stephen's discuss positions. [rev. 11]2011-08-22T14:22:15+00:00Sean Turnerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237507[Ballot comment]<br>I moved my discuss to a comment:<br><br>I support Stephen&#x27;s discuss positions.[Sean Turner] [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss [rev. 11]2011-08-22T14:22:15+00:00Sean Turnerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237506[Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss[Sean Turner] [Ballot discuss] This is an updated discuss based on the -09 version: - cleared - … [rev. 11]2011-08-22T12:26:33+00:00Sean Turnerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237505[Ballot discuss]<br>This is an updated discuss based on the -09 version:<br><br>- cleared<br><br>- cleared<br><br>- I support Stephen&#x27;s …[Stephen Farrell] [Ballot discuss] --- two more parts of this were obviously cleared (what were discuss points … [rev. 11]2011-08-18T15:20:04+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237504[Ballot discuss]<br>--- two more parts of this were obviously cleared (what were discuss<br>points 1 &amp; 8); I&#x27;ll look …[(System)] Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed [rev. 11]2011-08-12T20:55:15+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237503Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-09.txt [rev. 09]2011-08-12T20:55:15+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237502New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-09.txt</b>[Stephen Farrell] [Ballot comment] I agree with Pete that the last sentence of the abstract needs a … [rev. 11]2011-06-24T12:05:22+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237501[Ballot comment]<br>I agree with Pete that the last sentence of the abstract needs<br>a rewrite.[Stephen Farrell] [Ballot discuss] (1) The writing here is unclear at critical points, to the point where … [rev. 11]2011-06-24T12:05:22+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237500[Ballot discuss]<br>(1) The writing here is unclear at critical points, to the point<br>where I find this hard to …[Cindy Morgan] Removed from agenda for telechat [rev. 11]2011-06-23T19:05:17+00:00Cindy Morganhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237499Removed from agenda for telechat[Cindy Morgan] State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation. [rev. 11]2011-06-23T19:02:00+00:00Cindy Morganhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237498State changed to <b>IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed</b> from IESG Evaluation.[David Harrington] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded [rev. 11]2011-06-23T15:39:44+00:00David Harringtonhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237497[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded[Sean Turner] [Ballot discuss] - Is there any reason this draft can't point to 3588bis? It's at … [rev. 11]2011-06-23T14:47:35+00:00Sean Turnerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237496[Ballot discuss]<br>- Is there any reason this draft can&#x27;t point to 3588bis? It&#x27;s at version -26. Isn&#x27;t it close …[Sean Turner] [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded [rev. 11]2011-06-23T14:47:35+00:00Sean Turnerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237495[Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded[Jari Arkko] [Ballot comment] Regarding other Discusses, I am actually fine with the document otherwise except the … [rev. 11]2011-06-23T11:19:47+00:00Jari Arkkohttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237494[Ballot comment]<br>Regarding other Discusses, I am actually fine with the document otherwise except the above point, and with some …[Jari Arkko] [Ballot discuss] The document says: > 6.1.1. Ni > > The Ni AVP (AVP Code … [rev. 11]2011-06-23T11:19:47+00:00Jari Arkkohttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237493[Ballot discuss]<br>The document says:<br><br>&gt; 6.1.1. Ni<br>&gt;<br>&gt; The Ni AVP (AVP Code TBD5) is of type Unsigned32 …[Jari Arkko] [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded [rev. 11]2011-06-23T11:19:46+00:00Jari Arkkohttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237492[Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded[Gonzalo Camarillo] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded [rev. 11]2011-06-23T09:25:15+00:00Gonzalo Camarillohttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237491[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded[Robert Sparks] [Ballot comment] I support Russ' discuss. I also encourage stating more clearly that there is … [rev. 11]2011-06-22T15:52:44+00:00Robert Sparkshttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237490[Ballot comment]<br>I support Russ&#x27; discuss.<br><br>I also encourage stating more clearly that there is no mechanism for negotiating/detecting which …[Robert Sparks] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded [rev. 11]2011-06-22T15:52:44+00:00Robert Sparkshttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237489[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded[Russ Housley] [Ballot discuss] The Gen-ART Review by Ben Campbell on 3-Jun-2011 raised an important interoperability question. … [rev. 11]2011-06-22T14:54:26+00:00Russ Housleyhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237488[Ballot discuss]<br>The Gen-ART Review by Ben Campbell on 3-Jun-2011 raised an important<br> interoperability question. Ben pointed out that …[Russ Housley] [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded [rev. 11]2011-06-22T14:54:26+00:00Russ Housleyhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237487[Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded[Adrian Farrel] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded [rev. 11]2011-06-22T11:38:48+00:00Adrian Farrelhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237486[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded[Ralph Droms] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded [rev. 11]2011-06-22T00:35:02+00:00Ralph Dromshttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237485[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded[Peter Saint-Andre] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded [rev. 11]2011-06-21T21:05:09+00:00Peter Saint-Andrehttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237484[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded[Ron Bonica] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded [rev. 11]2011-06-21T16:44:25+00:00Ron Bonicahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237483[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded[Wesley Eddy] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded [rev. 11]2011-06-21T02:33:46+00:00Wesley Eddyhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237482[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded[Stewart Bryant] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded [rev. 11]2011-06-20T13:27:00+00:00Stewart Bryanthttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237481[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded[Stephen Farrell] [Ballot comment] I agree with Pete that the last sentence of the abstract needs a … [rev. 11]2011-06-18T22:25:59+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237480[Ballot comment]<br>I agree with Pete that the last sentence of the abstract needs<br>a rewrite.[Stephen Farrell] [Ballot discuss] (1) The writing here is unclear at critical points, to the point where … [rev. 11]2011-06-18T22:25:59+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237479[Ballot discuss]<br>(1) The writing here is unclear at critical points, to the point<br>where I find this hard to …[Stephen Farrell] [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded [rev. 11]2011-06-18T22:25:59+00:00Stephen Farrellhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237478[Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded[Pete Resnick] [Ballot comment] I am neither an IKE person nor a Diameter person. That said, the … [rev. 11]2011-06-17T13:51:52+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237477[Ballot comment]<br>I am neither an IKE person nor a Diameter person. That said, the following sentence, which appears in …[Pete Resnick] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded [rev. 11]2011-06-17T13:51:52+00:00Pete Resnickhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237476[Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded[Dan Romascanu] Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-06-23 [rev. 11]2011-06-16T13:36:33+00:00Dan Romascanuhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237475Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-06-23[Dan Romascanu] [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Dan Romascanu [rev. 11]2011-06-16T13:33:54+00:00Dan Romascanuhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237474[Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Dan Romascanu[Dan Romascanu] Ballot has been issued [rev. 11]2011-06-16T13:33:54+00:00Dan Romascanuhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237473Ballot has been issued[Dan Romascanu] Created "Approve" ballot [rev. 11]2011-06-16T13:33:53+00:00Dan Romascanuhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-288481Created &quot;Approve&quot; ballot[Dan Romascanu] State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead. [rev. 11]2011-06-16T13:28:06+00:00Dan Romascanuhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237472State changed to <b>IESG Evaluation</b> from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.[Jouni Korhonen] Submitted a while ago. [rev. 11]2011-06-15T08:10:02+00:00Jouni Korhonenhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237534Submitted a while ago.[Jouni Korhonen] IETF state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from WG Document [rev. 11]2011-06-15T08:10:02+00:00Jouni Korhonenhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237533IETF state changed to <b>Submitted to IESG for Publication</b> from WG Document[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-08.txt [rev. 08]2011-06-14T18:33:04+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237471New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-08.txt</b>[Amanda Baber] Upon approval of this document, IANA understands that there are three IANA Actions which must … [rev. 11]2011-06-08T18:58:49+00:00Amanda Baberhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237470Upon approval of this document, IANA understands that there are three<br>IANA Actions which must be completed.<br><br>First, in the …[(System)] State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call. [rev. 11]2011-06-03T07:19:52+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237469State changed to <b>Waiting for AD Go-Ahead</b> from In Last Call.[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-07.txt [rev. 07]2011-06-01T19:53:01+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237468New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-07.txt</b>[Samuel Weiler] Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Tobias Gondrom [rev. 11]2011-05-31T22:48:16+00:00Samuel Weilerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-673729Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Tobias Gondrom[Samuel Weiler] Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Tobias Gondrom [rev. 11]2011-05-31T22:48:16+00:00Samuel Weilerhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-504300Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Tobias Gondrom[Amy Vezza] Last call sent [rev. 11]2011-05-20T13:50:22+00:00Amy Vezzahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237535Last call sent[Amy Vezza] State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested. The following Last Call Announcement … [rev. 11]2011-05-20T13:50:22+00:00Amy Vezzahttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237467State changed to <b>In Last Call</b> from Last Call Requested.<br><br><b>The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:</b><br><br>From: The …[Dan Romascanu] Last Call was requested [rev. 11]2011-05-20T09:42:25+00:00Dan Romascanuhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237466Last Call was requested[Dan Romascanu] State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup. [rev. 11]2011-05-20T09:42:25+00:00Dan Romascanuhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237465State changed to <b>Last Call Requested</b> from AD Evaluation::AD Followup.[(System)] Ballot writeup text was added [rev. 11]2011-05-20T09:42:24+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237526Ballot writeup text was added[(System)] Last call text was added [rev. 11]2011-05-20T09:42:24+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237525Last call text was added[(System)] Ballot approval text was added [rev. 11]2011-05-20T09:42:24+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237524Ballot approval text was added[Dan Romascanu] Last Call text changed [rev. 11]2011-05-20T09:42:24+00:00Dan Romascanuhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237464Last Call text changed[(System)] Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed [rev. 11]2011-05-19T19:08:11+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237463Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-06.txt [rev. 06]2011-05-19T19:08:11+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237462New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-06.txt</b>[Dan Romascanu] State changed to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from Publication Requested. [rev. 11]2011-05-05T14:51:23+00:00Dan Romascanuhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237461State changed to <b>AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed</b> from Publication Requested.[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-05.txt [rev. 05]2011-04-19T07:00:05+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237532New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-05.txt</b>[Cindy Morgan] (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the Document Shepherd personally reviewed … [rev. 11]2011-03-30T19:50:05+00:00Cindy Morganhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237460(1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the<br><br>Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the<br><br>document …[Cindy Morgan] Draft added in state Publication Requested [rev. 11]2011-03-30T19:49:08+00:00Cindy Morganhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237459Draft added in state Publication Requested[Cindy Morgan] [Note]: 'Lionel Morand (lionel.morand@orange-ftgroup.com) is the document shepherd.' added [rev. 11]2011-03-30T19:49:08+00:00Cindy Morganhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237458[Note]: &#x27;Lionel Morand (lionel.morand@orange-ftgroup.com) is the document shepherd.&#x27; added[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-04.txt [rev. 04]2011-02-23T08:00:04+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237531New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-04.txt</b>[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-03.txt [rev. 03]2010-08-30T07:00:03+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237530New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-03.txt</b>[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-02.txt [rev. 02]2010-03-08T08:00:02+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237529New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-02.txt</b>[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-01.txt [rev. 01]2010-03-08T08:00:01+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237528New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-01.txt</b>[(System)] New version available: draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-00.txt [rev. 00]2010-01-06T08:00:00+00:00(System)https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/history/#history-237527New version available: <b>draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-00.txt</b>