Limited Use of Remote Keys (lurk)
|2016-10-04||Cindy Morgan||State changed to <b>BOF Concluded</b> from BOF|
The LURK BoF met Monday evening. We presented the use cases and two protocol proposals, and then moved into discussion of a charter proposal. The …
The LURK BoF met Monday evening. We presented the use cases and two protocol proposals, and then moved into discussion of a charter proposal. The sense of the room was that we should take the short-term certificate solution option and propose it to ACME. However, it was not clear there was sufficient understanding of the requirements for the TLS-signing protocol option to justify creating a working group at this time.
We would like to use this opportunity to thank the folks that contributed documents and reviews during this process. The LURK mailing list remains open for discussion focused on the need, if any, for a TLS-signing protocol.
|2016-06-24||Stephanie McCammon||sent scheduled notification for IETF-96|
|2016-03-11||Stephanie McCammon||sent scheduled notification for IETF-95|
|2016-02-26||Cindy Morgan||Group created in state BOF|