Glassey?McNeil's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding, draft-ietf-pkix-x509-ipaddr-as-extn, and draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-01
Note: Updates to IPR disclosures must only be made by authorized representatives of the original submitters. Updates will automatically be forwarded to the current Patent Holder's Contact and to the Submitter of the original IPR disclosure.
I. Patent Holder/Applicant ("Patent Holder")
|Holder legal name||Glassey?McNeil|
II. Patent Holder's Contact for Licence Application
|Holder contact name||Todd Glassey|
|Holder contact firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Holder contact info||
III. Contact Information for the IETF Participant Whose Personal Belief Triggered this Disclosure
IV. IETF Document or Other Contribution to Which this IPR Disclosure Relates
draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding ("Encrypted Content-Encoding for HTTP")
draft-ietf-pkix-x509-ipaddr-as-extn ("X.509 Extensions for IP Addresses and AS Identifiers")
V. Disclosure of Patent Information i.e., patents or patent applications required to be disclosed by RFC 3979 as updated by RFC 4879
A. For granted patents or published pending patent applications, please provide the following information:
|Patent, Serial, Publication, Registration, or Application/File number(s)||
ANY AND ALL USE OF ANY US6370629 OR US6393126 PROTECTED METHODS ARE CONTROLLED BY AN OPEN SOURCE STYLE AGREEMENT "MANDATING A CHOICE OF CALIFORNIA LAW FOR ANY AND ALL UNREGISTERED USERS:"
The Settlements in question have formally been served on IETF and CISCO and JUNIPER as a basis of notifying the entire IETF Working base but in fact these two settlement terms affect many if not all IETF standards published because of IETF and those parties use of the protected methods inside their own working infrastructures. As such - the California Law Settlement Mandate applies to most if not all x509 based crypto services IETF certifies but to a number of other crypto methods including but not limited to symmetric and asymmetric processes and their methods.
B. Does this disclosure relate to an unpublished pending patent application?:
|Has patent pending||No|
VI. Licensing Declaration
The Patent Holder states that its position with respect to licensing any patent claims contained in the patent(s) or patent application(s) disclosed above that would necessarily be infringed by implementation of the technology required by the relevant IETF specification ("Necessary Patent Claims"), for the purpose of implementing such specification, is as follows(select one licensing declaration option only):
|Licensing||See Text Below for Licensing Declaration|
|Licensing information, comments, notes, or URL for further information||
FRAND LICENISNING IS AVAILABLE FOR ANY AND ALL USERS. ANY NON-RELEASED USERS ARE TIED TO THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR ANY AND ALL USES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY LEGAL MATTERS INVOLVING CONTENT OR DATA PROCESSED, MANAGED, TRANSITED OR OTHERWISE CERTIFIED OR ACCESSED THROUGH METHODS PROTECTED AND TAUGHT BY US6370629 OR US6393126 (INCLUDING ANY ILLEGALLY FILED INSTANCES OF EITHER PATENT) AND ITS EFFECTS IN THOSE JURISDICTIONS PERTAINING TO THE USE OF IETF STANDARDS WHICH FORCE THE ADOPTERS TO USE THE PROTECTED METHODS AND INFRINGE THE SETTLEMENTS RELEASE TERMS AS SUCH.
Note: The individual submitting this template represents and warrants that he or she is authorized by the Patent Holder to agree to the above-selected licensing declaration.
VII. Contact Information of Submitter of this Form
|Submitter name||Todd Glassey|
VIII. Other Notes
The IETF is fully aware it has no legal standing to provide any party any enforceable release against the California Law section of the US6370629 and US6393126 Settlements, and as such we believe you as relying parties have damage claims against IETF yourselves for their [alleged] actions herein. Either way - you and IETF and your company are bound by the California Law TERM SET PER THESE TWO DOCUMENTS:
1) DDI Settlement: http://www.slideshare.net/tglassey/contractsddisettlement
2) TTI Settlement: http://www.slideshare.net/tglassey/contractsttisettlement-sym00012sym00028
3) Settlement Analysis with FRAND Terms: http://www.slideshare.net/tglassey/analysis-of-settlement-requirements
4) Open Source Licensing Demand: http://www.slideshare.net/tglassey/opensource-demand-1
PER DEMAND: See Section 8 and review backwards to see how all are tied to the CHOICE OF LAW STATEMENT ss8.1. ALSO NOTICE IRRELEVANT OF WHO CONTROLS ENFORCEMENT OF LICENSING - ALL PARTIES USING THE US6370629 OR US6393126 IP ARE TIED TO THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THAT USE - INCLUDING ANY PRODUCTS INCORPORATING SAID IP, UNTIL SUCH TIME A RELEASE IS OBTAINED FROM MCNEIL AND MYSELF FOR OUR CLAIMS.
Only those sections of the relevant entry form where the submitter provided information are displayed.