datatracker.ietf.org
Sign in
Version 5.3.0, 2014-04-12
Report a bug

Martin Euchner's statement about possible IPR claimed in draft-ietf-msec-mikey-dhhmac-09.txt belonging to Infineon AG

Only those sections of the "Patent Disclosure and Licensing Declaration Template for Notification" where the submitter provided information are displayed.

This IPR disclosure updates IPR disclosure ID #498, "Martin Euchner's Statement about possible IPR claimed in draft-ietf-msec-mikey-dhhmac-07.txt belonging to Infineon AG".

Update this IPR disclosure. Note: Updates to IPR disclosures must only be made by authorized representatives of the original submitters. Updates will automatically be forwarded to the current Patent Holder's Contact and to the Submitter of the original IPR disclosure.

Submitted Date: February 21, 2005

I. Possible Patent Holder/Applicant ("Patent Holder")
Legal Name: Infineon AG
II. Contact Information for the IETF Participant Whose Personal Belief Triggered this Disclosure:
Name: Martin Euchner
Title: Dipl-Inform
Department: Siemens AG, Com GC PS 3
Address1: Hofmannstr. 51
Address2: D-81359 Munich
Telephone: +49 89 722 55790
Fax: +49 89 722 62366
Email: martin.euchner@siemens.co
III. IETF Document or Other Contribution to Which this IPR Disclosure Relates:
Internet-Draft:"HMAC-Authenticated Diffie-Hellman for Multimedia Internet KEYing (MIKEY)"
(draft-ietf-msec-mikey-dhhmac-09)
IV. Disclosure of Patent Information (i.e., patents or patent applications required to be disclosed by Section 6 of RFC 3979)
A. For granted patents or published pending patent applications, please provide the following information:
Patent, Serial, Publication, Registration, or Application/File number(s): EP 1 125 395 B1
Date(s) granted or applied for: 1 December 2004
Country: DE FR GB IT
Additional Notes:

B. Does this disclosure relate to an unpublished pending patent application?: 0
C. If an Internet-Draft or RFC includes multiple parts and it is not reasonably apparent which part of such Internet-Draft or RFC is alleged to be covered by the patent information disclosed in Section V(A) or V(B), it is helpful if the discloser identifies here the sections of the Internet-Draft or RFC that are alleged to be so covered:
No information submitted