datatracker.ietf.org
Sign in
Version 5.3.0, 2014-04-12
Report a bug

Simon Josefsson's statement about possible IPR claimed in RFC 4634 belonging to The United States of America as represented by the National Security Agency

Only those sections of the "Patent Disclosure and Licensing Declaration Template for Notification" where the submitter provided information are displayed.

Update this IPR disclosure. Note: Updates to IPR disclosures must only be made by authorized representatives of the original submitters. Updates will automatically be forwarded to the current Patent Holder's Contact and to the Submitter of the original IPR disclosure.

Submitted Date: January 23, 2007

I. Possible Patent Holder/Applicant ("Patent Holder")
Legal Name: The United States of America as represented by the National Security Agency
II. Contact Information for the IETF Participant Whose Personal Belief Triggered this Disclosure:
Name: Simon Josefsson
Title:
Department:
Address1:
Address2:
Telephone: +46-8-6190422
Fax:
Email: simon@josefsson.org
III. IETF Document or Other Contribution to Which this IPR Disclosure Relates:
RFC 4634:"US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and HMAC-SHA)"
IV. Disclosure of Patent Information (i.e., patents or patent applications required to be disclosed by Section 6 of RFC 3979)
A. For granted patents or published pending patent applications, please provide the following information:
Patent, Serial, Publication, Registration, or Application/File number(s): US patent 6,829,355
Date(s) granted or applied for: December 7, 2004
Country: USA
Additional Notes:

The relevance of this patent to the RFC is based on the comments in the section
"After the panel" from:

http://www.proper.com/lookit/hash-futures-panel-notes.html

The patent itself is available from:

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6829355.PN.&OS=PN/6829355&RS=PN/6829355

B. Does this disclosure relate to an unpublished pending patent application?: 0
C. If an Internet-Draft or RFC includes multiple parts and it is not reasonably apparent which part of such Internet-Draft or RFC is alleged to be covered by the patent information disclosed in Section V(A) or V(B), it is helpful if the discloser identifies here the sections of the Internet-Draft or RFC that are alleged to be so covered:
No information submitted