IPR Search
The material posted as IPR disclosures should be viewed as originating from the source of that information, and any issue or question related to the material should be directed to the source rather than the IETF. There is no implied endorsement or agreement by the IETF, the IESG or any other IETF entities with any of the material.
Back
Document IPR search results
rfc4875
Total number of IPR disclosures found: 5.
| Date | ID | Statement |
|---|---|---|
| 2009-05-07 | 1145 | Juniper's Statement of IPR related to RFC 4875 |
| 2009-03-09 | 1110 | Redback Networks, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to RFC 4875 |
| 2009-02-09 | 1077 | Juniper's Statement of IPR related to RFC 4875 |
| 2008-11-11 | 1016 | Fujitsu Limited's Statement about IPR related to RFC 4875 |
| 2008-11-10 | 1011 | Fujitsu Limited's Statement about IPR related to RFC 4875 |
Total number of documents searched: 2.
| Date | ID | Statement |
|---|---|---|
| Results for RFC 4875 ("Extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol - Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) for Point-to-Multipoint TE Label Switched Paths (LSPs)") | ||
| 2008-11-10 | 1011 | Fujitsu Limited's Statement about IPR related to RFC 4875 |
| 2008-11-11 | 1016 | Fujitsu Limited's Statement about IPR related to RFC 4875 |
| 2009-02-09 | 1077 | Juniper's Statement of IPR related to RFC 4875 |
| 2009-03-09 | 1110 | Redback Networks, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to RFC 4875 |
| 2009-05-07 | 1145 | Juniper's Statement of IPR related to RFC 4875 |
| Results for draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-te-p2mp ("Extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol - Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) for Point-to-Multipoint TE Label Switched Paths (LSPs)"), which was became rfc draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-te-p2mp ("Extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol - Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) for Point-to-Multipoint TE Label Switched Paths (LSPs)") | ||
| No IPR disclosures have been submitted directly on draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-te-p2mp, but there are disclosures on a related document, listed on this page. | ||