Skip to main content

IPR Search

The material posted as IPR disclosures should be viewed as originating from the source of that information, and any issue or question related to the material should be directed to the source rather than the IETF. There is no implied endorsement or agreement by the IETF, the IESG or any other IETF entities with any of the material.

Back

Document IPR search results
rfc9269

Total number of IPR disclosures found: 6.

Date ID Statement
2022-04-11 5616 Cisco's Statement about IPR related to draft-irtf-icnrg-icn-lte-4g
(Updates ID#: 5587)
2022-04-11 5615 Cisco's Statement about IPR related to draft-irtf-icnrg-icn-lte-4g
(Updates ID#: 5588)
2022-04-11 5614 Cisco's Statement about IPR related to draft-irtf-icnrg-icn-lte-4g
(Updates ID#: 5589)
2022-04-11 5613 Cisco's Statement about IPR related to draft-irtf-icnrg-icn-lte-4g
(Updates ID#: 5590)
2019-09-11 3703 IDAC Holdings, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-irtf-icnrg-icn-lte-4g
2019-09-11 3702 IDAC Holdings, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-irtf-icnrg-icn-lte-4g

Total number of documents searched: 2.

Date ID Statement
Results for draft-irtf-icnrg-icn-lte-4g ("Experimental Scenarios of Information-Centric Networking (ICN) Integration in 4G Mobile Networks")
2019-09-11 3702 IDAC Holdings, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-irtf-icnrg-icn-lte-4g
2019-09-11 3703 IDAC Holdings, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-irtf-icnrg-icn-lte-4g
2022-04-11 5613 Cisco's Statement about IPR related to draft-irtf-icnrg-icn-lte-4g
(Updates ID#: 5590)
2022-04-11 5614 Cisco's Statement about IPR related to draft-irtf-icnrg-icn-lte-4g
(Updates ID#: 5589)
2022-04-11 5615 Cisco's Statement about IPR related to draft-irtf-icnrg-icn-lte-4g
(Updates ID#: 5588)
2022-04-11 5616 Cisco's Statement about IPR related to draft-irtf-icnrg-icn-lte-4g
(Updates ID#: 5587)
Results for RFC 9269 ("Experimental Scenarios of Information-Centric Networking (ICN) Integration in 4G Mobile Networks")
No IPR disclosures have been submitted directly on RFC 9269, but there are disclosures on a related document, listed on this page.

Back