Skip to main content

IPR Search

The material posted as IPR disclosures should be viewed as originating from the source of that information, and any issue or question related to the material should be directed to the source rather than the IETF. There is no implied endorsement or agreement by the IETF, the IESG or any other IETF entities with any of the material.

Back

Document IPR search results
draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic

Total number of IPR disclosures found: 1.

Date ID Statement
2007-11-06 901 Hitachi's Statement about IPR claimed in RFC 2766

Total number of documents searched: 6.

Date ID Statement
Results for draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic ("Reasons to Move the Network Address Translator - Protocol Translator (NAT-PT) to Historic Status")
No IPR disclosures have been submitted directly on draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic, but there are disclosures on related documents, listed on this page.
Results for RFC 4966 ("Reasons to Move the Network Address Translator - Protocol Translator (NAT-PT) to Historic Status")
No IPR disclosures have been submitted directly on RFC 4966, but there are disclosures on related documents, listed on this page.
Results for draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-exprmntl ("Reasons to Move NAT-PT to Experimental"), which was replaced by draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic ("Reasons to Move the Network Address Translator - Protocol Translator (NAT-PT) to Historic Status")
No IPR disclosures have been submitted directly on draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-exprmntl, but there are disclosures on related documents, listed on this page.
Results for draft-ietf-ngtrans-natpt ("Network Address Translation - Protocol Translation (NAT-PT)"), which was obsoleted by draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic ("Reasons to Move the Network Address Translator - Protocol Translator (NAT-PT) to Historic Status")
No IPR disclosures have been submitted directly on draft-ietf-ngtrans-natpt, but there are disclosures on related documents, listed on this page.
Results for RFC 2766 ("Network Address Translation - Protocol Translation (NAT-PT)"), which was obsoleted by draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic ("Reasons to Move the Network Address Translator - Protocol Translator (NAT-PT) to Historic Status")
2007-11-06 901 Hitachi's Statement about IPR claimed in RFC 2766
Results for draft-aoun-v6ops-natpt-deprecate ("Reasons to Deprecate NAT-PT"), which was replaced by draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-exprmntl ("Reasons to Move NAT-PT to Experimental")
No IPR disclosures have been submitted directly on draft-aoun-v6ops-natpt-deprecate, but there are disclosures on related documents, listed on this page.

Back