Liaison statement
Reply to LS on PQC transition for RFC 6509
Additional information about IETF liaison relationships is available on the
IETF webpage
and the
Internet Architecture Board liaison webpage.
| State | Posted |
|---|---|
| Submitted Date | 2026-01-09 |
| From Group | SEC |
| From Contact | Charles Eckel <eckelcu@cisco.com> |
| To Group | 3GPP-TSG-SA-WG3 |
| To Contacts | 3GPP Liaison statements <3GPPLiaison@etsi.org> Peter Schmitt <Peter.Schmitt@huawei.com> |
| Cc | Charles Eckel <eckelcu@cisco.com> Deb Cooley <debcooley1@gmail.com> Paul Wouters <paul.wouters@aiven.io> The IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org> |
| Response Contact | Paul Wouters <paul.wouters@aiven.io> Deb Cooley <debcooley1@gmail.com> |
| Purpose | In response |
| Attachments | Reply to LS on PQC transition for RFC 6509 |
| Liaisons referred by this one |
LS on PQC transition for RFC 6509
|
| Body |
1. Description Thank you for the inquiry [1] on RFC 6509 [2]. The IETF Security Area Directors [3] have surveyed the appropriate working groups and the IRTF's CFRG [4]. While parts of the MIKEY suite of protocols are already quantum resistant (the symmetric algorithms/modes), RFC 6509 is not. It is unclear how easy or possible an update that is secure would be. The IETF and IRTF's CFRG do not have plans to update this Informational RFC. 2. Upcoming Meetings IETF 125, 14 - 20 March 2026, Shenzhen, China IETF 126, 18 - 24 July, Vienna, Austria 3. References [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/2070/ [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6509/ [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/sec/about/ [4] https://www.irtf.org/cfrg.html |