REGEXT meeting at IETF 105 Montreal 2019-07-25 10:00-1200 Co-chair James Galvin in the room Co-chair Antoin Verschuren on jabber/meetecho Jabber scribe: Suzanne Wolf Minutes: Ulrich Wisser Note well on screen https://www.ietf.org/about/note-well/ Introduction by James Galvin Three RFC published - Change Poll Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8590/ - Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Organization Mapping https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8543/ - Organization Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8544/ Two documents in IESG considerations - Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees/ - Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Domain Name Mapping Extension for Strict Bundling Registration (Informational) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration Documents in WG LC - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-login-security/ Data Escrow, Franzisco Arias on behalf of Gustavo Lozano https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping/ - Antoin Verschuren asks on intended status, why standards track - Richard Wilhelm, Verisign, we need privacy considerations - Richard Wilhelm, Verisign, data requirements will change in future - Marc Blanchet, this is deployed and stable - James Gould, Verisign, we need to relax some requirements to optional RDAP partial response/sorting and paging/reverse search, Mario Loffredo https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search/ - James Galvin, co-chair, reminds group about Milestones - Richard Wilhelm, Verisign, do not introduce new features before we have operational experience - Tom Harrison, APNIC, feedback on technical details of search - Stephan Brotzmeyer, Afnic, draft needs much more specific privacy considerations - Andrew Newton, ARIN, we need more privacy considerations, we do not need to wait on ICANN - Peter Koch, via Jabber, agrees with Stephan Bortzmeyer - Richard Wilhelm, Verisign, waiting not on ICANN but on operational experience, especially on GDPR influence - James Galvin, co-chair, we need more privacy discussions on these Documents - James Gould, Verisign, we need implementations status - Scott Hollenbeck, Verisign, implementation status is hard, people need to inform author Is this EPP/RDAP 2 stream model working?, George Michaelson - Barry Laiba, AD, we are flexible about the stream - Andrew Newton, ARIN, is the model in the charter? - Ulrich Wisser, .SE, there are reasons for this model which should be documented Potential New work RDAP Deployment Findings and Update, Marc Blanchet https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-blanchet-regext-rdap-deployfindings/ - Andrew Newton, ARIN, wg should be working on this - Scott Hollenbeck, Verisign, review RDAP RFC documents - Richard Wilhelm, Verisign, evolve to BCP - James Gould, Verisign, BCP is good idea, document needs reworking - Stephan Bortzmeyer, Afnic, should registry or RFC documents be fixed Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Secure Authorization Information for Transfer, James Gould https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gould-regext-secure-authinfo-transfer/ - Barry Leiba, AD, what is the intended status, should be standards track - Ulrich Wisser, .SE, that is what we implemented - Jody Kolker, Godaddy, get authcode when you want to transfer RDAP jCard Profile, Tom Harrison https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rdap-jcard-profile/ - Barry Leiba, AD, the AD's think jscontact is likely better solution - James Gould, Verisign, should we replace it? - Andrew Newton, ARIN, we should stay with jcard, because of current deployment - Neil Jenkins, Fastmeil, jscontact goal is to be simple to use - Barry Leiba, not AD, consider alternative and then decide which solution is better - George Michaelson, Apnic, multilingual is important - Neil Jenkins, Fastmail, yes - jscontact can support multilingual Registration Report Definition, Joseph Yee - James Galvin, co-chair, we have similar document in backlog - James Gould, Verisign, both documents are very close