LPWAN WG IETF 108 Agenda Meeting : IETF108 Thursday, July 30, 2020 Venue : Online Video Link : https://www.meetecho.com/ietf108/lpwan/ Audo Link : http://mp3.conf.meetecho.com/ietf/ietf1084.m3u Time : Session II 13:00-13:50 UTC (50min) Location : Room 4 Chairs : Pascal Thubert pthubert@cisco.com Alexander Pelov a@ackl.io Responsible AD : Eric Vyncke Live minutes : https://codimd.ietf.org/notes-ietf-108-lpwan Live feeds : https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/agenda/ Other URLs : https://tools.ietf.org/wg/lpwan/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/lpwan/ https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lpwan [13:00] Administrivia (chairs) [ 5min] o Note-Well, Scribes, Agenda Bashing o Status of drafts [13:05] draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-sigfox (Juan-Carlos Zuniga) [10min] [13:15] draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-lorawan (Olivier Gimenez) [10min] [13:25] draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-nbiot (Ana Minaburo) [ 5min] [13:30] draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-yang-data-model (Laurent Toutain) [10min] [13:40] draft-ietf-lpwan-coap-static-context-hc-15 (Ana Minaburo) [ 5min] [13:45] AOB, Adjourn Minutes Times in UTC [13:00] Administrivia (chairs) [ 5min] Note-Well, Scribes, Agenda Bashing o displays agenda o displays milestones Status of drafts o OAM draft: still there, no progress at his time [13:03] draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-sigfox (Juan-Carlos Zuniga) [10min] during hackathon, off-line coding. update on the draft o use of FCN to indicate size of packets/ # of fragments. Will test in next version of PySCHC next steps o interop at Bangkok? o more fine-tuning Laurent: for tests, openSCHC core on a public server, could be used for interop. JCZ: Good to know. We will look into that. Ivaylo: use of sequence #, means no interleaving? JCZ: Sigfox Seq# counter spans over multiple (frag/data) sessions. We can interleve. [13:10] draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-lorawan (Olivier Gimenez) [10min] -08 published two weeks ago goes through changes in -08 o rework of retransmission timer during the interim meeting no comment so far on -08 outcome of the WGLC? Pascal: WGLC is finished, now working on the comments, solving the issues. Pascal: -08 could be submitted to IESG for publication, Dominique to do his work as shepherd (write-up + check IPR + request) Pascal: will tell Dominique the right way of submitting to IESG [13:16] draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-nbiot (Ana Minaburo) [ 5min] shows 3GPP architecture, more complex than that described in RFC8376 3 use cases for SCHC depending on NB-IoT data transmission choice (IP, non-IP, NAS) JCZ: in case 2, need to transfer context to visited network, complicated? Ana: already done for RoHC. Home HLR sends context to visited network. JCZ: would be interesting to explain in the draft. JCZ: how about SCHC over the top of NB-IoT? Ana: this is case 3. SCEF is used to pass the context (??) goes on presenting fragmentation Pascal: Transfer Blocks, can you explain again? Ana: Transfer Block increment is 2 bytes, hence the 16 bits. JCZ: 1000 bits not multiple of 16 bits, confusing. Ana: need reviewers Pascal: LoraWAN authors, could you have a look, compare sections for missing info, etc? Ivo: volunteers Olivier volunteers, too Alex: no hard deadline, in the coming weeks/month. [13:30] draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-yang-data-model (Laurent Toutain)[10min] draft is stable. On GitHub LPWAN repo. describes the content of the draft. Pascal: what’s the unit of time for timers? Laurent: description of field says it’s seconds. Alex: will submit to YANG doctors for review Laurent reiterates draft is stable, happy with what they have now. How about a WGLC to raise attention and bring comments in? Pascal: vacation time. Even if we LC now, we will extend the review time into september? Pascal: then, why not get feedback from YANG doctors before WGLC? Alex: suggests to wait for coap-over-schc to pass IESG Alex: how do we get a YANG doctor review? Eric: ask for review by YANG doctor. Can help asking for this. Alex: shoot for WGLC in Sept. Laurent: synchronize with CORECONF. Pascal: why? Alex: we should not put a dependecy on CORECONF. This doc is self-standing. Let’s ship this one. [13:43] draft-ietf-lpwan-coap-static-context-hc-15 (Ana Minaburo) [ 5min] one DISCUSS remaining to solve. (there were two more, now solved) goes over changes from -13 to -15 o better depiction of various ways of using SCHC with CoAP o clarified uni/bidirectional terminology still to work before issuing -16: some comments from B Kaduk Pascal: thank a lot to Ana for hard work and to the IESG for the reviews [13:50] Meeting is adjourned