DMM session IETF109

Minutes: Pablo Camarillo
Chairs introduction

    Administrative & Intro
    WG Document status
        FPC: Unfortunately there is no progress to close it although document is on the very last step
    Rechartering discussion to happen
        New items like integration of underlay and overlay; path steering on N6; … (see chair slide)

Transport Network aware Mobility for 5G

Draft: draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility, Presents: Uma Chunduri

Pablo: The MTNC-id space seems small taking into account that it identifies an slice and a path through the network. Why dont you decouple the slice identifier from the path identifier?
Uma: They are actually decoupled. See the latest version of the draft, there’s a section specifically about it.
Hanu: You should have in mind what TEAS is doing.
Uma: We are not conflicting with what they are doing. Please let me know if there’s any conflict, but I dont think that is the case.

Sri: Have you presented in other IETF WGs?
Uma: No, only in DMM.
Sri: The authors would like to do WG adoption right?; Yes
Sri: We will follow up with Erik on this.
Architecture Discussion on SRv6 Mobile User plane

Draft: draft-kohno-dmm-srv6mob-arch, Presents: Miya Kohno

Uma: Can you please confirm what is the relationship with the SRv6 draft?
Miya: Yes, this is related. This is presenting the architectural considerations for it.

Hannu: -Bad audio- How are applications interacting with this common dataplane?
Miya: If there is a common dataplane in between the network and the compute stack, then its easier to have end to end policies.
SFC function mobility with Mobile IPv6

Draft: draft-bernardos-dmm-sfc-mobility-01, Presents: Carlos Jesus Bernardos

Carlos: I would like to know whether this problem is interesting to the community. Please read and share feedback.