·         Pros and Cons of IPv6 Transition Technologies for IPv4aaS

·         2021-10-16, <draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison>

·         Scalability of IPv6 Transition Technologies for IPv4aaS

·         2021-10-16, <draft-lencse-v6ops-transition-scalability>

·         Isolating Hosts in Layer-2 and Layer-3 to Simplify ND and IPv6 First-Hop Deployments

·         2021-07-12, <draft-xiao-v6ops-nd-deployment-guidelines>

·        Administrivia (5 minutes)

·        Goals of this meeting (10 minutes)

·        Requirement and solution drafts

v  Operational Issues with Processing of the Hop-by-Hop Options Header (20 min)

v  2021-10-11 , <draft-ietf-v6ops-hbh>

v  IPv6 Hop-by-Hop Options Processing Procedures (20 min)

v  2021-06-02 , <draft-hinden-6man-hbh-processing>

v  Limits on Sending and Processing IPv6 Extension Headers (20 min)

v  2021-06-22 , <draft-herbert-6man-eh-limits>

·        Lightening talks on use-cases (20 minutes, strictly limited to 5 minutes and 3 slides per talk)

v  IPv6 Minimum Path MTU Hop-by-Hop Option

v  2021-09-30, < draft-hinden-6man-mtu-option>

v  Approaches on Supporting IOAM in IPv6

v  2021-07-08, < draft-song-ippm-ioam-ipv6-support >

v  Carrying Virtual Transport Network (VTN) Identifier in IPv6 Extension

v  2021-10-24, < draft-dong-6man-enhanced-vpn-vtn-id >

v  IPv6 Application of the Alternate Marking Method

v  2021-10-22, < draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark >

·        Structured group discussion of the following questions (25 minutes)

v Do we want to proceed with rehabilitation of the HBH?

v Do we want to take some other action (e.g., deprecate the HBH Option)?

v Do we need to reexamine currently defined HBH options?

v Do we want to deprecate selected HBH options?

v What work / documents need to progress to make this happen?