[{"author": "Meetecho", "text": "If you have neither we can help you save some bandwidth :)<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T13:30:09Z"}, {"author": "Richard Scheffenegger", "text": "anyone local we can direct to go stand in the Mic Q to be viewable...<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T13:30:38Z"}, {"author": "Jonathan Morton", "text": "yup<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T13:30:59Z"}, {"author": "Richard Scheffenegger", "text": "9 ppl in the room<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T13:31:17Z"}, {"author": "Richard Scheffenegger", "text": "yes<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T13:31:48Z"}, {"author": "Michael T\u00fcxen", "text": "If you want me to channel something, prepare you message with [MIC].<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T13:35:23Z"}, {"author": "Richard Scheffenegger", "text": "the AD has entered the room :)<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T13:35:30Z"}, {"author": "Martin Duke", "text": "@chairs -- I am here at the front of the room if you need any help onsite<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T13:39:12Z"}, {"author": "Michael T\u00fcxen", "text": "Great, thanks. The camera is off...<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T13:39:34Z"}, {"author": "Richard Scheffenegger", "text": "very muted and bass-heavy<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T13:42:08Z"}, {"author": "Richard Scheffenegger", "text": "now better<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T13:42:12Z"}, {"author": "Richard Scheffenegger", "text": "you sound more natural now<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T13:42:38Z"}, {"author": "Richard Scheffenegger", "text": "please repeat<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T13:42:48Z"}, {"author": "Ira McDonald", "text": "remote sound is FINE for him and was already<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T13:42:51Z"}, {"author": "Wesley Eddy", "text": "I will be happy to review and work on anything in this area of options &amp; syn options extension.<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T13:49:09Z"}, {"author": "Mohamed Boucadair", "text": "EDO makes sense to be progressed<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T13:49:21Z"}, {"author": "Mohamed Boucadair", "text": "The syn part may require some cycles at least to check also the propal from Yoshi<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T13:49:54Z"}, {"author": "Lars Eggert", "text": "personally (and w/no hats), am in the \"don't care\" camp<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T13:51:15Z"}, {"author": "Meetecho", "text": "We've turned the camera on again as apparently someone is sitting at the chair desk now<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T14:13:14Z"}, {"author": "Martin Duke", "text": "was it netflix that uses some flavor of newreno?<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T14:13:45Z"}, {"author": "Jonathan Morton", "text": "LFN - Long Fat Networks<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T14:15:11Z"}, {"author": "Vidhi Goel", "text": "@Martin yes<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T14:15:48Z"}, {"author": "Jonathan Morton", "text": "with some cautions about A-B testing in itself, note yesterday's IRTF presentation on \"unbiased evaluations\"<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T14:16:20Z"}, {"author": "Jonathan Morton", "text": "14:30 Unbiased experiments in congested networks<br/>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Bruce Spang<br/>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=\"https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.00118\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.00118</a><br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T14:16:57Z"}, {"author": "Colin Perkins", "text": "I'm struggling to see what experiments can still be done here \u2013 cubic has been very widely studied<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T14:17:21Z"}, {"author": "Martin Duke", "text": "We're not sure where Markku stands but ISTM he is in the rough<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T14:20:37Z"}, {"author": "Colin Perkins", "text": "Sorry - forgot to take myself out of the queue<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T14:25:33Z"}, {"author": "Lars Eggert", "text": "RFC5033 does not include ant RFC2119 MUST (or any RFC2119 language). And the document is clear that it intends to give guidance to the IETF community, not establish a formal process. FWIW.<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T14:32:32Z"}, {"author": "Martin Duke", "text": "If we do Option 1 I would suggest that the value be 1 less than the requested ACK rate, so that it is impossible to express 0.<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T15:00:28Z"}, {"author": "Martin Duke", "text": "(that is, the max value would be 64, not 63)<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T15:00:38Z"}, {"author": "Richard Scheffenegger", "text": "bob: your voice is breaking up<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T15:01:03Z"}, {"author": "Martin Duke", "text": "I wonder if the Robe draft is better positioned as a MPTCP thing in TCPM or a multipath thing in TSVWG<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T15:14:58Z"}, {"author": "Carles Gomez", "text": "@Martin: thanks for your comment. Definitely, if we go for Option 1, then we need to fix the R=0 issue. For that,&nbsp;&nbsp;your proposal looks good!<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T15:20:00Z"}, {"author": "Jonathan Morton", "text": "I think Option 2 might still be justified, so we should start a thread on the mailing list about it<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T15:21:00Z"}, {"author": "Jonathan Morton", "text": "the arithmetic seems to work out even for current link speeds<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T15:21:19Z"}, {"author": "Carles Gomez", "text": "Thanks, Jonathan. I will start a thread on it. By the way, if we remove the Ignore Order feature, we may have one additional bit available for the R field.<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T15:26:17Z"}, {"author": "jhoyla", "text": "Is there a reason not to use NewSessionTickets and TLS resumptions?<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T15:26:26Z"}, {"author": "Richard Scheffenegger", "text": "Thanks all!<br/>", "time": "2022-03-23T15:34:22Z"}]