meetecho: Please pan.
", "time": "2022-07-27T16:18:37Z"}, {"author": "Christian Ams\u00fcss", "text": "Thanks :-)
", "time": "2022-07-27T16:19:22Z"}, {"author": "Sofia Celi", "text": "+1 great idea
", "time": "2022-07-27T16:23:55Z"}, {"author": "Jeffrey Haas", "text": "As Karen requested, a suggested open mic topic I want to introduce is \"a proposal to deal with contentious WG proposals\". Suggesting about 10 mins as an intro. I currently have no slides.
", "time": "2022-07-27T16:28:31Z"}, {"author": "Lucas Pardue", "text": "just want to say a big thanks to the tools team. I've reported a few bugs via the link at the bottom of the datatracker and they have all been fixed in just a couple of weeks, that's great.
", "time": "2022-07-27T16:31:48Z"}, {"author": "Jeffrey Haas", "text": "^ +
", "time": "2022-07-27T16:32:51Z"}, {"author": "Pete Resnick", "text": "Just putting the dates next to the draft names on the drop-down in the diff tool would help with that.
", "time": "2022-07-27T16:33:16Z"}, {"author": "Tero Kivinen", "text": "History page already have dates.
", "time": "2022-07-27T16:37:34Z"}, {"author": "Christian Ams\u00fcss", "text": "The history's usability is greatly enhanced when chairs actually use the \"link additional drafts to this session\" button in the materials.
", "time": "2022-07-27T16:37:48Z"}, {"author": "Tero Kivinen", "text": "There is also the Preferences setting where you can set what is considered \"new\", i.e., if you set the new to be 90 days, then you will get \"new\" marker to all drafts that has been updated in last 90 days. No 120 days there, so can't really see what is new since last ietf, but almost...
", "time": "2022-07-27T16:39:40Z"}, {"author": "Robert Sparks", "text": "/me looks so forward to moving off trac
", "time": "2022-07-27T16:41:02Z"}, {"author": "Robert Sparks", "text": "charles would be better closer to the mic
", "time": "2022-07-27T16:42:56Z"}, {"author": "Charles Eckel", "text": "makes sense and sounds good Robert. Thx
", "time": "2022-07-27T16:46:36Z"}, {"author": "Robert Sparks", "text": "CPIM!
", "time": "2022-07-27T16:47:55Z"}, {"author": "Jeffrey Haas", "text": "I believe I'll treat the total silence on the topic as lack of interest and I won't bother with followup to wgchairs. We'll discuss implementing as policy in wg's I'm chairs of.
", "time": "2022-07-27T16:52:35Z"}, {"author": "Sofia Celi", "text": "so nice!
", "time": "2022-07-27T16:53:42Z"}, {"author": "Lucas Pardue", "text": "\"propose additional resources\" like we do with meeting slides..?
", "time": "2022-07-27T16:54:35Z"}, {"author": "Sofia Celi", "text": "+1
", "time": "2022-07-27T16:57:32Z"}, {"author": "Charles Eckel", "text": "@Lucas, no, this in the datatracker page for an I-D or RFC.
", "time": "2022-07-27T16:58:10Z"}, {"author": "Robert Sparks", "text": "I'm talking to the secretariat and these chairs about people being listed in this group as 'reviewers'. It is surprising to the datatracker.
", "time": "2022-07-27T16:58:49Z"}, {"author": "Charles Eckel", "text": "e.g. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-shmoo-hackathon/
", "time": "2022-07-27T16:59:21Z"}, {"author": "Karen O'Donoghue", "text": "Thanks Robert
", "time": "2022-07-27T16:59:22Z"}, {"author": "Pete Resnick", "text": "The more side meetings get support like that, the more \"officially sanctioned\" they become, and that gets complicated.
", "time": "2022-07-27T16:59:58Z"}, {"author": "Dhruv Dhody", "text": "Not sure what link could be provided for proprietary implementations where as the Implementation Status in the draft is easier to add text
", "time": "2022-07-27T17:00:40Z"}, {"author": "Andy Malis", "text": "Talk to your AD
", "time": "2022-07-27T17:01:09Z"}, {"author": "Lucas Pardue", "text": "Sorry charles, to clarify I mean a \"hands off\" approach to the continuity of the additional resources. It's potentially easier as a chair to see a request to approve something and approve it, than to copy paste text in boxes when authors know (or drum up courage) to ask the chair
", "time": "2022-07-27T17:01:41Z"}]