[{"author": "Italo Busi", "text": "

@Daniele Ceccarelli good summary. I would also add the need to identify what is generic that applies to both WSON and flexi-grid, but not necessarily to optical impairments :)

", "time": "2022-11-07T10:08:39Z"}, {"author": "Daniele Ceccarelli", "text": "

agree

", "time": "2022-11-07T10:10:08Z"}, {"author": "Fatai Zhang", "text": "

agree

", "time": "2022-11-07T10:14:01Z"}, {"author": "Italo Busi", "text": "

+1 to Daniel

", "time": "2022-11-07T10:17:11Z"}, {"author": "Robert Wilton", "text": "

@Adrian, the hope is that the two core YANG module versioning drafts will go to NETMOD WG LC in the next 3-4 months, but we also thought the same thing at IETF 114 (as a contributor to this work).

", "time": "2022-11-07T10:25:18Z"}, {"author": "Adrian Farrel", "text": "

@Rob, that's good timing. I think that the CCAMP work won't be popping out before that, and it should start to try to use the techniques (not least to test that they are useable)

", "time": "2022-11-07T11:14:18Z"}, {"author": "Haomian Zheng", "text": "

Thank you Julien.

", "time": "2022-11-07T11:29:19Z"}, {"author": "Italo Busi", "text": "

@Haomian Zheng @Julien Meuric maybe instead of IGP, LMP or some YANG model at the controller's NBI can be sufficient. For further discussion offline

", "time": "2022-11-07T11:30:10Z"}, {"author": "Fatai Zhang", "text": "

bye

", "time": "2022-11-07T11:32:43Z"}]