[{"author": "Kent Watsen", "text": "<p>Thank you Joel!</p>", "time": "2022-11-08T09:31:11Z"}, {"author": "Joel Jaeggli", "text": "<p>thanks lou!</p>", "time": "2022-11-08T09:31:18Z"}, {"author": "Kent Watsen", "text": "<p>Thank you, Jason!</p>", "time": "2022-11-08T09:31:23Z"}, {"author": "Scott Mansfield", "text": "<p>samans</p>", "time": "2022-11-08T09:48:25Z"}, {"author": "Carsten Bormann", "text": "<p>Power failure in right front corner?</p>", "time": "2022-11-08T09:52:28Z"}, {"author": "Robert Wilton", "text": "<p>They have had presentation issues in DNSOP, so have moved on to another presentation, but I will need to step out again, probably in about 15 mins time</p>", "time": "2022-11-08T09:57:21Z"}, {"author": "Robert Wilton", "text": "<p>Sorry!</p>", "time": "2022-11-08T09:57:33Z"}, {"author": "Lou Berger", "text": "<p>@rob no problem</p>", "time": "2022-11-08T09:59:09Z"}, {"author": "Kent Watsen", "text": "<p>agree w/ Balazs regarding that documenting the behavior helps to reduce special cases</p>", "time": "2022-11-08T10:01:11Z"}, {"author": "Robert Wilton", "text": "<p>Stepping out again now</p>", "time": "2022-11-08T10:06:01Z"}, {"author": "Beno\u00eet Claise", "text": "<p>Bill, regarding time/date in YANG , should be generic, or within this ACL YANG module? The former, I guess, no?</p>", "time": "2022-11-08T10:20:06Z"}, {"author": "Kent Watsen", "text": "<p>I do not disagree - this WG is okay</p>", "time": "2022-11-08T10:30:26Z"}, {"author": "Bill Fenner", "text": "<p><span class=\"user-mention\" data-user-id=\"578\">@Beno\u00eet Claise</span> that's a good point too - capture the complexity of recurring events in another module, and refer to it from here.</p>", "time": "2022-11-08T10:33:38Z"}, {"author": "Beno\u00eet Claise", "text": "<p>@bill, yes, to be reused in ACL, QoS, Service configuration, etc... Hopefully, it won't be too complex/too long to standardise ...  We don't want the SUPA experience again :-)</p>", "time": "2022-11-08T10:35:53Z"}, {"author": "Qin Wu", "text": "<p>@benoit, good question, my impressionis generic, will coordinate with ACL extension authors about this.</p>", "time": "2022-11-08T10:58:26Z"}, {"author": "Qin Wu", "text": "<p>@benoit, that is not the intention to go to that complexity, but point  taken</p>", "time": "2022-11-08T11:00:35Z"}, {"author": "Carsten Bormann", "text": "<p>If there is a \"don't do this\", I want a tool to support this.</p>", "time": "2022-11-08T11:16:16Z"}, {"author": "Robert Wilton", "text": "<p>@Carsten, as you mean you want the tool to reject this as valid?</p>", "time": "2022-11-08T11:17:28Z"}, {"author": "Robert Wilton", "text": "<p>Sorry, do you mean that you want the tool to reject this?</p>", "time": "2022-11-08T11:17:52Z"}, {"author": "Jason Sterne", "text": "<p>Not sure how easily a tool can find &amp; reject/accept these trees. That requires having access to all (or a large set) of the revisions of a module and analyze the relationship amongst them all. We were more thinking of the tool as working on 2 revisions of a module to compare them.</p>", "time": "2022-11-08T11:23:02Z"}, {"author": "Robert Wilton", "text": "<p>@Jason, I think that for \"sensible\" semver versions, it should just be possible to check against the previous version in the file.</p>", "time": "2022-11-08T11:28:25Z"}, {"author": "Jason Sterne", "text": "<p>Maybe - but I'm not sure that analysis can differentiate/identify any of these good vs bad trees. To be analyzed...</p>", "time": "2022-11-08T11:31:23Z"}]