[{"author": "Jabber", "text": "

sftcd: bummer, hope all recovered soon

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:00:10Z"}, {"author": "Robin Wilton", "text": "

I admit I am not...

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:05:45Z"}, {"author": "Robin Wilton", "text": "

For the notes: I am willing to do a (non expert!) review.

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:06:43Z"}, {"author": "Jonathan Hammell", "text": "

I plan to review in the next couple weeks (as indicated in the room).

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:07:09Z"}, {"author": "Robin Wilton", "text": "

(it's only 164 pages, after all... ;^O )

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:07:24Z"}, {"author": "Robin Wilton", "text": "

If everyone's stepping off the cliff, it must be a good idea.

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:08:09Z"}, {"author": "Jabber", "text": "

sftcd: thanks all for volunteering

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:08:27Z"}, {"author": "Jabber", "text": "

sftcd: @robin: it's a wylie coyote kinda cliff so it'll be fine:-)

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:08:48Z"}, {"author": "Jabber", "text": "

sftcd: for remote folks, feel free to jump into the queue (same for onsite folks)

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:11:05Z"}, {"author": "Robin Wilton", "text": "

Just for clarity, I see two \"draft-koch-openpgp-\" documents, so make sure you're looking at the \"rfc4880bis-00\" draft, not the \"webkey-service\" draft.

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:11:34Z"}, {"author": "Daniel Gillmor", "text": "

that's right, it's rfc4880bis-00

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:11:51Z"}, {"author": "Jabber", "text": "

sftcd: yes, as per recent list discussion

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:11:59Z"}, {"author": "Daniel Gillmor", "text": "

proposal: move version number from v5 to v6 for: Key, Signature, OPS, and PKESK

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:18:12Z"}, {"author": "Robin Wilton", "text": "

I'm not qualified to make a decision at this point, sorry.

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:19:09Z"}, {"author": "Samuel Gwinn", "text": "

Is it possible to remove one's vote

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:24:30Z"}, {"author": "Samuel Gwinn", "text": "

I do not feel qualified to weigh in. I did not note the option to abstain before I clicked an option.

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:25:48Z"}, {"author": "Jabber", "text": "

sftcd: @samuel, no problem we'll score it at 12:0 so

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:27:17Z"}, {"author": "Jabber", "text": "

sftcd: aron's proposal: pick salt length based on hash alg used in signature

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:34:22Z"}, {"author": "Robin Wilton", "text": "

@sftcd Your text here is how I understood it too.

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:35:23Z"}, {"author": "Jabber", "text": "

sftcd: ta

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:35:45Z"}, {"author": "Robin Wilton", "text": "

Is the goal of Aron's proposal to prevent people from using a stronger hashing algorithm with a weaker (shorter) salt?

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:37:11Z"}, {"author": "Jabber", "text": "

sftcd: dkg variant: add salt length to IANA registry for sig algs

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:37:29Z"}, {"author": "Jabber", "text": "

sftcd: Robin Wilton_web_187: did you want me to ask that in the room or join the queue?

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:39:17Z"}, {"author": "Robin Wilton", "text": "

@sftcd Since you and Aron are both in the room, would you mind asking (mic line permitting).

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:39:59Z"}, {"author": "Jabber", "text": "

sftcd: will do

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:40:17Z"}, {"author": "Jonathan Hammell", "text": "

Maybe PQ will result in v7 sigs. :wink:

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:41:22Z"}, {"author": "Jabber", "text": "

sftcd: @robin: he's answering you now anyway:-)

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:42:28Z"}, {"author": "Robin Wilton", "text": "

ack

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:43:43Z"}, {"author": "Robin Wilton", "text": "

LOL

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:46:26Z"}, {"author": "Robin Wilton", "text": "

OK, I'll get back in my box ;^)

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:46:42Z"}, {"author": "Ira McDonald", "text": "

polls are BINARY only

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:47:22Z"}, {"author": "Robin Wilton", "text": "

Am I reading this correctly... that <4GB is considered to be a \"small\" message? :flushed:

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:53:00Z"}, {"author": "Robin Wilton", "text": "

Ah, OK, thanks.

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:53:49Z"}, {"author": "Jonathan Hammell", "text": "

proposed trailer fix would be another deviation from draft-koch, right?

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:56:17Z"}, {"author": "Jabber", "text": "

dkg: yes, it is another deviation from draft-koch

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:56:45Z"}, {"author": "Jabber", "text": "

sftcd: but we'll be v6 signatures then right, so we avoid the non-interop (or don't make it worse)

", "time": "2022-11-08T13:57:15Z"}, {"author": "Robert Lee", "text": "

Assuming old versions will go away because we've asked them to feels very optimistic to me. Is there a reason to be confident that v3 is actually going to go away?

", "time": "2022-11-08T14:00:13Z"}, {"author": "Robin Wilton", "text": "

@sftcd No objection

", "time": "2022-11-08T14:08:38Z"}, {"author": "Robin Wilton", "text": "

I think we've already discussed enough work items to keep people busy until re-chartering becomes the next logical step.

", "time": "2022-11-08T14:09:17Z"}, {"author": "Jabber", "text": "

sftcd: ta

", "time": "2022-11-08T14:09:37Z"}, {"author": "Mike Ounsworth", "text": "

Ok, dumb question: what's \"SPECIFICATION REQUIRED\" ?

", "time": "2022-11-08T14:18:38Z"}, {"author": "Daniel Gillmor", "text": "

that's what we're talking about here

", "time": "2022-11-08T14:18:48Z"}, {"author": "Mike Ounsworth", "text": "

Yeah, I see that, but I don't know what the words mean

", "time": "2022-11-08T14:19:03Z"}, {"author": "Daniel Gillmor", "text": "

we're trying to figure out how to tell the designated expert what we think is a sufficient \"specification\"

", "time": "2022-11-08T14:19:31Z"}, {"author": "Roman Danyliw", "text": "

For registration policy possibilities, see Section 4 of https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8126.html

", "time": "2022-11-08T14:22:32Z"}, {"author": "Roman Danyliw", "text": "

\"Specification Required\" is Section 4.6 = https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8126.html#section-4.6

", "time": "2022-11-08T14:23:33Z"}, {"author": "Mike Ounsworth", "text": "

@Aron Wussler when you say \"composite\", do you mean the key / sig / kem wire encoding according to draft-ounsworth-pq-composite-keys-03, or something else?

\n

If you like, I would love to sit down with you and talk about terminology as per draft-driscoll-pqt-hybrid-terminology to avoid confusion.

", "time": "2022-11-08T14:27:01Z"}, {"author": "Jabber", "text": "

sftcd: I'm gonna suggest we have an interim meeting after the end of WGLC and when we've hit the \"publication requested\" button for crypto-refresh - sound ok?

", "time": "2022-11-08T14:28:38Z"}, {"author": "Jabber", "text": "

sftcd: with rechartering being the topic of that interim

", "time": "2022-11-08T14:28:58Z"}, {"author": "Jabber", "text": "

dkg: sftcd: sounds reasonable

", "time": "2022-11-08T14:29:18Z"}, {"author": "Mike Ounsworth", "text": "

Algorithm pairs look reasonable to me at first glance. The only comment is whether you actually need that many?

", "time": "2022-11-08T14:31:22Z"}, {"author": "Jabber", "text": "

dkg: i'm also scared of the number of options

", "time": "2022-11-08T14:31:47Z"}, {"author": "Jabber", "text": "

sftcd: thanks all

", "time": "2022-11-08T14:31:48Z"}, {"author": "Robin Wilton", "text": "

Thanks everyone

", "time": "2022-11-08T14:31:52Z"}, {"author": "Jabber", "text": "

dkg: i recommend just choosing two

", "time": "2022-11-08T14:31:52Z"}, {"author": "Jabber", "text": "

dkg: if folks find they need more, they can specify them later

", "time": "2022-11-08T14:32:15Z"}]