[{"author": "Alessandro Amirante", "text": "<p>test</p>", "time": "2022-11-07T15:44:24Z"}, {"author": "David Black", "text": "<p>We see you ...</p>", "time": "2022-11-07T15:46:30Z"}, {"author": "Al Morton", "text": "<p>Many thanks, David!!!</p>", "time": "2022-11-07T15:48:07Z"}, {"author": "Richard Scheffenegger", "text": "<p>all good</p>", "time": "2022-11-07T15:48:16Z"}, {"author": "Anna Brunstrom", "text": "<p>I am a bit confused by the discussion if multipath protocols can be standards track as we already have MPTCP as a proposed standard?</p>", "time": "2022-11-07T16:34:19Z"}, {"author": "Piers O'Hanlon", "text": "<p>I understand that Apple have deployed MPTCP for Siri for some years now so presumably it's working ok for them? I think they also have expanded use of the MPTCP API to other apps which would also indicate its utility...</p>", "time": "2022-11-07T16:49:07Z"}, {"author": "Sri Gundavelli", "text": "<p>Yes, that is my understanding as well. Also, the 3GPP ATSSS work references MPTCP Proxy.</p>", "time": "2022-11-07T16:51:33Z"}, {"author": "Sri Gundavelli", "text": "<p>That was my question as if there are any SDOs referencing this work. If yes, then the question on moving from experimental track will be relevant.</p>", "time": "2022-11-07T16:52:13Z"}, {"author": "Sri Gundavelli", "text": "<p>My comment on relation to tunnel based multipath approaches previously standardized and this one ...is the key difference around scheduling.</p>", "time": "2022-11-07T16:54:22Z"}, {"author": "Sri Gundavelli", "text": "<p>Sorry I was not clear ..with the mask on ..</p>", "time": "2022-11-07T16:54:49Z"}, {"author": "Dirk Hugo", "text": "<p>@Sri: at 3GPP there is currently the decision that enhanced ATSSS should support non-TCP and discussion whether MP-DCCP (and/or MPQUIC) should be included in corresponding TS</p>", "time": "2022-11-07T16:56:38Z"}, {"author": "Sri Gundavelli", "text": "<p>Dirk - That is good to hear. If this makes it, it will really make sense to  consider moving out of exp track.</p>", "time": "2022-11-07T16:57:31Z"}, {"author": "Dirk Hugo", "text": "<p>and there it may be relevant whether the protocol is exp or std</p>", "time": "2022-11-07T16:57:44Z"}, {"author": "Sri Gundavelli", "text": "<p>I agree</p>", "time": "2022-11-07T16:58:19Z"}, {"author": "Richard Scheffenegger", "text": "<p>exp, ps, std...</p>", "time": "2022-11-07T16:58:29Z"}, {"author": "Richard Scheffenegger", "text": "<p>i think the discussion was ps vs exp; personally I am ok with ps.</p>", "time": "2022-11-07T16:58:50Z"}, {"author": "David Black", "text": "<p>Yes ps (i.e., standards track) vs. experimental.</p>", "time": "2022-11-07T16:59:19Z"}, {"author": "Anna Brunstrom", "text": "<p>@Sri, in relation to differences between solutions, functionality of MP-DCCP is similar to MPTCP, but without the reliability. As in MPTCP, you can use the transport protocol information for scheduling.</p>", "time": "2022-11-07T17:01:29Z"}, {"author": "Sri Gundavelli", "text": "<p>Thanks Anna for the clarification. I see the clear difference now compared to the other tunnel based approaches. I looked at the draft. Thanks</p>", "time": "2022-11-07T17:04:08Z"}]