[{"author": "Francesca Palombini", "text": "<p>hello!</p>", "time": "2023-03-30T06:01:33Z"}, {"author": "Martine Lenders", "text": "<p><span aria-label=\"wave\" class=\"emoji emoji-1f44b\" role=\"img\" title=\"wave\">:wave:</span></p>", "time": "2023-03-30T06:01:40Z"}, {"author": "Francesca Palombini", "text": "<p>awwww hello Fabian!!</p>", "time": "2023-03-30T06:01:51Z"}, {"author": "Francesca Palombini", "text": "<p>he seems to be enjoying CBOR already :D</p>", "time": "2023-03-30T06:02:17Z"}, {"author": "Christian Ams\u00fcss", "text": "<p>meetecho, please pivot to the speaker</p>", "time": "2023-03-30T06:05:41Z"}, {"author": "Christian Ams\u00fcss", "text": "<p>Ad similar language: I so wish it was a superset :-/</p>", "time": "2023-03-30T06:33:36Z"}, {"author": "John Preu\u00df Mattsson", "text": "<p>Regarding deterministic CBOR implementations. I would assume that an implementation that receives CBOR, does D = decode(CBOR), and then checks that  encode(D) == CBOR uses twice as many clock cycles as an optimal implementation and uses significantly more memory as CBOR, D, and encode(D) have to be in memory at the same time. Or am I missing something? The described implementation is however likely optimal in code size if you want to support both deterministic and non-deterministic CBOR.</p>", "time": "2023-03-30T06:41:08Z"}, {"author": "Christian Ams\u00fcss", "text": "<p>As I understand, Carsten's implementation is a Ruby one. If cycles matter to you, that's not what you'd use.</p>", "time": "2023-03-30T06:42:26Z"}, {"author": "Chris Lemmons", "text": "<p>I have opinions on how the modules work, but I\u00a0can take them to the list and we can work them if we adopt it.</p>", "time": "2023-03-30T06:53:32Z"}, {"author": "Christian Ams\u00fcss", "text": "<p>Let's hear it once the adoption run is through</p>", "time": "2023-03-30T06:54:15Z"}, {"author": "Christian Ams\u00fcss", "text": "<p>(understanding they would not impact adoption)</p>", "time": "2023-03-30T06:54:28Z"}, {"author": "Chris Lemmons", "text": "<p>Please adopt these. :)</p>", "time": "2023-03-30T06:54:28Z"}, {"author": "Esko Dijk", "text": "<p>CDDL import: RFCs with errata are another risk factor here.</p>", "time": "2023-03-30T06:59:41Z"}, {"author": "Francesca Palombini", "text": "<p>Thank you! bye</p>", "time": "2023-03-30T07:01:00Z"}, {"author": "Chris Lemmons", "text": "<p>Many thanks!</p>", "time": "2023-03-30T07:01:04Z"}, {"author": "Christian Ams\u00fcss", "text": "<p>Thanks Marco for the minutes!</p>", "time": "2023-03-30T07:01:07Z"}]