MINUTES: BMWG Session (IETF-116) March 28, Tuesday Session II 0400 - 0600 UTC Other Time Zones: Room: G316 ops bmwg https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/116/agenda/ AGENDA - 28 participants, total. WG Status: - RFC: 9411, Benchmarking Methodology for Network Security Device Performance - WG Adoptions, and Proposals WG Drafts: MLR Search and YANG Model (brief status) - One leaf removed in YANG Model, MLR discussed later. + Benchmarking Methodology for Stateful NATxy Gateways using RFC 4814 Pseudorandom Port Numbers https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-02 status: - comments exchanged on new version - Generating Multiple IP addresses are needed/proposed for the method now. This is not yet implemented. - WGLC? Start after authors implement proposal and review. Proposals: + Considerations for Benchmarking Network Performance in Containerized Infrastructures - Minh-Ngoc Tran https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dcn-bmwg-containerized-infra-10 - Sharing updates and progress, thanks for reviews - Pods are only deployed on Baremetal hosts - Revised deployment figures, New - Looking at results from Hackathon 115 some improvement with new OVS - Vratko - will review, then review can be part of the adoption call. maybe combined review with Maciek. Eduard And Gabor will also review. - ACTION to wait for review notifications, then WG Adoption. + Benchmarking Methodology for MPLS Segment Routing - Paolo Volpato Related Draft: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-vfv-bmwg-srmpls-bench-meth-06.txt - Paolo: describe the latest updates to address the comments received so far - Recap, Need to expand on RFC 5695, Test SID list is longer than one SID in the RFC - Gabor and Bruno provided comments. - How is TST 007 used? wrong, meant TST009 - Louis Chen, Juniper, 3 Comments about: - no affect of certain label operations. - Why have a long list of SIDs? - Also, consider taking action on the QoS of the labels, for scalability. Paolo agreed to expand the text - Ask for Volunteer reviews to the list. pre-adoption. + Benchmarking Methodology for IPv6 Segment Routing - Eduard Vasilenko Related Draft: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-vfv-bmwg-srv6-bench-meth-06.txt - Eduard: describe the latest updates to address the comments received so far - Feedback from Gabor and Bruno - big change to add encapsulations in transit, and more labels - Louis Chen, Juniper, asked about MicroSID is out of scope, not approved yet, doc could be very large if trying to include every possible test. - Seek Adoption via volunteer reviewers on the list - try for more participation. - ACTION on both SR drafts: seek review assignments pre-Adoption. + Problems and Requirements of Evaluation Methodology for Integrated Space and Terrestrial Networks https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lai-bmwg-sic-benchmarking/ status: - Presenter: Qi Zhang - updated draft with additional considerations, plus new draft - Can we define meaningful benchmarking that fits within BMWG's lab-only charter? - Key question: what limited aspect of the many-dimensional ISTN problem presented here could be pursued for benchmarking network DUT/SUT? - Qi Zhang: review of progress. - Regulators and space observations can provide constellation info. Need orbital parameters for testing/report. - Ground station and Inter-Sat connectivity need to be determined. Meshes can be formed among near Ground stations. Network links may be used based on delay calculations and link speeds. - Slide with OSPF? latencies - How measured? ping used. Telsat has the least number of satellites, so longest latencies <100ms stiil better than GEO. NOTE: all these latency measurements are UN-LOADED - best case... - Plan to work on more concrete methods for benchmarking - Paolo: Latency tests with IPv4 connectivity? yes. Is IPv6 supported? consider finding this in the future. - Qi: Reg info changes frequently - find the representative parameters for repeatable benchmarking. + LAST - MLR Draft Update - Vratko - Current version of draft is out of date - Expanded classifications of trial outcomes - reviewed 8 example classification of load conditions after a number of trials - + AOB -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=