Date: Friday 31 March, 09:30 - 11:30 Local
Room: G314-G315
5m - Chair Introduction (Wes)
5m - SATP Scope (Claire)
Claire presented path to adoption for documents to be used in the
working group
John Levine: does transfer mean move or copy?
Claire: answered affirmatively
Wes presented list of terms.
There was conversation about the meaning of "legal" in the terms.
Should be the owner authorized to move an asset around the network.
Show of hands for adoption of architecture document: 12 hands in
meetecho poll.
A question on ISO 20022 which is used by the financial community. Two
Swift
experts were at the bof and noted that 20022 does not handle NFTs. SATP
also
has atomic transfer properties not present in 20022. Chairs have
suggested
a comparison between 20022 and SATP.
Show of hands for adoption: 8 hands in favor, 0 hands
Show of hands for adoption: 8 raised hands, 1 not raised. Chairs invited
questions
for why some did not raise hands.
Questions about errors in the document. Authors stated that the document
will need
that information added to the document during the working group process.
Chairs
clarified document process.
This was covered during doc discussion.
There are 2 I-Ds explaining. sat-data-sharing sat-views
No equivalent of AS number for SATP. Work on gateway ID.
[architecture]:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hardjono-sat-architecture
[protocol]:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hargreaves-sat-core/
[use cases]:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ramakrishna-sat-use-cases/