# SIDROPS Working Group {#sidrops-working-group} IETF 116 Yokohama Wednesday 29 March 2023 04:00 - 06:00 UTC * Chair Slides / AOB - 5 mins * "RPKI Ecosystem Measurement" https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/slides-116-sidrops-rpki-ecosystem/ Randy Bush - 20 minutes "the problem is, its a pull protocol" there was a lively discussion at the microphone. * "ASPA deployment experience-yycix https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/slides-116-sidrops-aspa-deployment-experience-yycix/ Job Snijders - 5 Minutes suggests that ASPA invalids should be DROPPED at the start, not later on as we did with ROA (with only 5 active ASPA) discussion at the level of SHOULD vs MUST on this, applicability to IX, general case * "Update on draft-spaghetti-sidrops-aspa-slurm https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-spaghetti-sidrops-aspa-slurm/ Job Snijders - 5 Minutes seeking the lowest common denominator/MVP for SLURM in ASPA amongst the RP/RTR developers. KISS principle also seeking WG adoption. Some interest in the room in this work * "Update on draft-ietf-sidrops-rfc6482bis https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidrops-rfc6482bis/01/ Job Snijders - 5 Minutes WGLC on the proposed BIS. Nobody spoke against so it goes to the list for WGLC noting some concerns/nits to come * "draft-spaghetti-sidrops-rpki-asgroup" (new work) https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-spaghetti-sidrops-rpki-asgroup-00.html Job Snijders - 15 Minutes the inevitable consequences of not having flag days in a world of IRR/RPSL and RPKI signed objects. proposing a strawman 3779 related ASN1 object to manage the AS\_SET/grouping function in a managed cryptographically verified hierarchical manner Some lively discussion. If this is a strawman it did it's job (hah) * "ASPA-based AS Path Verification Draft Update" https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-sidrops-aspa-verification Kotikalapudi Sriram - 10 Minutes v13 in WGLC. No time for Qs * "RFC 8183 BPKI Key Rollovers" (new work) Tim Bruijnzeels - 20 Minutes mechanistic and logistical issues around managing children, so its not RPKI its the bPKI alongside proposes 2 docs. Comment from Chat: (RobA) *I want problem analysis for what Tim is talking about before we decide what protocol changes are needed. Best practice document is reasonable.*