[{"author": "Rui Paulo", "text": "<p>starting the topic</p>", "time": "2023-07-25T22:04:56Z"}, {"author": "Eric Kinnear", "text": "<p>If anyone has comments you'd like read at the mic, please prefix with mic:</p>", "time": "2023-07-25T22:09:33Z"}, {"author": "Vidhi Goel", "text": "<p>agree w Matt reg fairness</p>", "time": "2023-07-25T22:19:54Z"}, {"author": "Christian Huitema", "text": "<p>Hell yes we should address bufferbloat!</p>", "time": "2023-07-25T22:21:13Z"}, {"author": "Spencer Dawkins", "text": "<p>I could reasonably suggest that the editors ask Mark if he's happy to be listed in the ACKs. No response to that question  is also information.</p>", "time": "2023-07-25T22:21:25Z"}, {"author": "Christian Huitema", "text": "<p>There is also the little details that QUIC implementations do not in practice use Reno as specified in 9002. Many use Cubic or BBR.</p>", "time": "2023-07-25T22:30:06Z"}, {"author": "Christian Huitema", "text": "<p>We have a long list of documents, so let's write a few more...</p>", "time": "2023-07-25T22:45:29Z"}, {"author": "Lucas Pardue", "text": "<p>Can just turn CC into a pseudo-acronym that doesn't mean anything literal</p>", "time": "2023-07-25T22:46:11Z"}, {"author": "Lucas Pardue", "text": "<p>or backronym it to choo-choo</p>", "time": "2023-07-25T22:46:37Z"}, {"author": "Reese Enghardt", "text": "<p>I am not excited about the idea of more bikeshedding about names... :)</p>", "time": "2023-07-25T22:48:38Z"}, {"author": "Spencer Dawkins", "text": "<p><span class=\"user-mention silent\" data-user-id=\"1419\">Reese Enghardt</span> <a href=\"#narrow/stream/374-ccwg/topic/ietf-117/near/81723\">said</a>:</p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>I am not excited about the idea of more bikeshedding about names... :)</p>\n</blockquote>\n<p>Understood.</p>", "time": "2023-07-25T22:50:23Z"}, {"author": "Christian Huitema", "text": "<p>Wonder whether BBRv3 considred exiting startup on RTT signals</p>", "time": "2023-07-25T22:58:02Z"}, {"author": "Roland Bless", "text": "<p>What about RTT fairness? I guess that flows with larger RTT will still get a larger share...</p>", "time": "2023-07-25T23:06:34Z"}, {"author": "Greg Mirsky", "text": "<p>Faster reaction might cause a drawback and make the network less stable.</p>", "time": "2023-07-25T23:27:47Z"}, {"author": "Rui Miao", "text": "<p>To answer the first question, the telemetry information is only carried with sender and receiver with AIMD/MIMD principle, and thus it doesn't require global consensus to converge quickly</p>", "time": "2023-07-25T23:29:07Z"}, {"author": "Rui Miao", "text": "<p>To Greg, as long as the reaction is carried on at most once per round trip time, the network can be proofed to be stable.</p>", "time": "2023-07-25T23:30:04Z"}]