[{"author": "Carles Gomez", "text": "

Hello!

", "time": "2023-07-27T16:30:02Z"}, {"author": "Quentin Lampin", "text": "

Hello everyone

", "time": "2023-07-27T16:30:20Z"}, {"author": "Ana Minaburo", "text": "

Hello!

", "time": "2023-07-27T16:31:26Z"}, {"author": "Dominique Barthel", "text": "

Hello everyone

", "time": "2023-07-27T16:32:47Z"}, {"author": "\u00c9ric Vyncke", "text": "

More people in the room than on the camera ;-)

", "time": "2023-07-27T16:32:53Z"}, {"author": "Ana Minaburo", "text": "

Ok, I'll try

", "time": "2023-07-27T16:34:17Z"}, {"author": "\u00c9ric Vyncke", "text": "

for minute takers https://notes.ietf.org/notes-ietf-117-lpwan?both

", "time": "2023-07-27T16:35:22Z"}, {"author": "Daniel Migault", "text": "

I was disconnected for a few seconds.

", "time": "2023-07-27T16:41:08Z"}, {"author": "Sergio Aguilar", "text": "

:clap:

", "time": "2023-07-27T16:42:39Z"}, {"author": "Ivan Martinez", "text": "

:clap:

", "time": "2023-07-27T16:42:41Z"}, {"author": "Sergio Aguilar", "text": "

:clap:

", "time": "2023-07-27T16:45:46Z"}, {"author": "Daniel Migault", "text": "

the WG is schcer in franglish

", "time": "2023-07-27T16:46:20Z"}, {"author": "Carles Gomez", "text": "

It might be good to advertise a bit more the \"schc\" mailing list, which currently has 28 subscribers (way less than the 254 subscribers of the \"lp-wan\" mailing list)

", "time": "2023-07-27T16:51:58Z"}, {"author": "Daniel Migault", "text": "

or redirect lp-wan to schc

", "time": "2023-07-27T16:52:59Z"}, {"author": "\u00c9ric Vyncke", "text": "

I just wonder whether GDPR (or similar policies) would allow this.

", "time": "2023-07-27T16:53:45Z"}, {"author": "Daniel Migault", "text": "

not really redirecting but subscribing all lpwan to schc

", "time": "2023-07-27T16:53:50Z"}, {"author": "\u00c9ric Vyncke", "text": "

This would require an opt-out rather than an opt-in, and possibly a GDPR violation (but I am not a lawyer)

", "time": "2023-07-27T16:55:09Z"}, {"author": "Daniel Migault", "text": "

I do not think that is an issue... but I am not either a lawyer ;-)

", "time": "2023-07-27T16:57:13Z"}, {"author": "Dominique Barthel", "text": "

I dont get it. To my understanding, SCHC does not mandate that the payload to be compressed is a multiple of 8 bits. Am I mistaken ?

", "time": "2023-07-27T18:28:40Z"}, {"author": "Dominique Barthel", "text": "

The field descriptors include field length in bits, nothing mandates that the sum of the field lengths is a multiple of 8.

", "time": "2023-07-27T18:29:50Z"}, {"author": "Carles Gomez", "text": "

Agreed

", "time": "2023-07-27T18:30:10Z"}, {"author": "Marco Tiloca", "text": "

That was also my understanding; the padding is more for the compression residue, if it doesn't happen to be aligned to the byte by chance

", "time": "2023-07-27T18:30:24Z"}, {"author": "Dominique Barthel", "text": "

padding is for the underlying layer

", "time": "2023-07-27T18:31:20Z"}]