[{"author": "Harald Alvestrand", "text": "<p>no messages?</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T00:06:26Z"}, {"author": "Cullen Jennings", "text": "<p>Start of meeting IETF 117</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T00:06:33Z"}, {"author": "Harald Alvestrand", "text": "<p>better. zulip still surprises me.</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T00:06:58Z"}, {"author": "Mike Bishop", "text": "<p>I'm a little surprised by the assumption that there will be no third-party extensions here.</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T00:18:03Z"}, {"author": "Murray Kucherawy", "text": "<p>Standards Action is the highest possible bar, I think. Why not Specification Required?</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T00:19:43Z"}, {"author": "Jonathan Lennox", "text": "<p>Murray, did you want that at the mic?</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T00:20:18Z"}, {"author": "Murray Kucherawy", "text": "<p>Not necessary, I'll catch it in AD Evaluation. :)</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T00:22:23Z"}, {"author": "Mark Harris", "text": "<p>With only 31 possible short extensions and 96 others it should have a high bar.</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T00:22:28Z"}, {"author": "Murray Kucherawy", "text": "<p>The explanation I heard was that we wanted \"some kind of IETF-level review\".  \"Standards Action\" certainly gets you that, but there are a couple of other policies that get you the same thing without going quite that far.</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T00:24:19Z"}, {"author": "Murray Kucherawy", "text": "<p>IETF Review, RFC Required, IESG Approval, Specification Required</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T00:25:00Z"}, {"author": "Murray Kucherawy", "text": "<p>It's fine if \"Standards Action\" is what's really needed here, just want to make sure we've considered other options.</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T00:25:32Z"}, {"author": "Mark Harris", "text": "<p>Doesn't that mean that repeat IDs would have to be allowed?  Otherwise the separator extension would make no sense.</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T00:32:50Z"}, {"author": "Mark Harris", "text": "<p>Also ordering would have to matter to use the separator extension.</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T00:34:01Z"}, {"author": "Timothy Terriberry", "text": "<p>You could think of other ways to map extensions to frames than by using an extension (or by using one differently), but yes, you're correct about the current approach.</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T00:45:52Z"}, {"author": "Jonathan Rosenberg", "text": "<p>I think the upper bound is greater than 1s</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T01:05:32Z"}, {"author": "Jonathan Rosenberg", "text": "<p>This is not the attack Jonathan is describing</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T01:08:09Z"}]