[{"author": "Cheng Li", "text": "<p>Good day everyone!</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T16:33:07Z"}, {"author": "Antoine Fressancourt", "text": "<p>I am interested in contributiong to security work</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T16:35:20Z"}, {"author": "Alvaro Retana", "text": "<p>Please send email to spring-chairs@  Thanks!</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T16:35:50Z"}, {"author": "Antoine Fressancourt", "text": "<p>will do !</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T16:36:28Z"}, {"author": "Cheng Li", "text": "<p>I am interested as well</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T16:37:19Z"}, {"author": "Alvaro Retana", "text": "<p>As Bruno mentioned, we'll send out a message to the list.  Please reply with your interest -- to spring-chairs@   That will make it easier to keep all interested people in one place.</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T16:40:14Z"}, {"author": "Darren Dukes", "text": "<p>Thanks Alvaro.</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T16:41:10Z"}, {"author": "Martin Vigoureux", "text": "<p>Since I can't make a comment on the microphone, I would like to note that although the list of behaviors has been updated in the draft, a number of IANA values are still not allocated.</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T16:55:57Z"}, {"author": "Alvaro Retana", "text": "<p>Thanks Martin!</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T16:57:09Z"}, {"author": "Joel Halpern", "text": "<p>Typically, unless early allocation is requested, IANA allocation from RFCs are done as TBD1, TBD2, ...  For implementation a number of code points have been allocated using the FCFS policy, we need to make sure things line up at the end of the process.</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T16:57:16Z"}, {"author": "Boris Khasanov", "text": "<p>Great work Rakesh!</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T17:13:48Z"}, {"author": "Dhruv Dhody", "text": "<p>Also, do we really need a new term \"SR Policy group\"?</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T17:41:40Z"}, {"author": "Cheng Li", "text": "<p>It confuses me as well, I may need to read more about the use cases of SR policy group</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T17:42:58Z"}, {"author": "Ketan Talaulikar", "text": "<p><span class=\"user-mention\" data-user-id=\"1080\">@Jim Guichard</span> , I asked the question because the document was standards track but the authors clarified that is should be informational. Informational status is appropriate for the content. The Q is if the WG wants to consider adopting such work items - to me this is just one form of \"configuration template\".</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T17:43:00Z"}, {"author": "Ketan Talaulikar", "text": "<p><span class=\"user-mention\" data-user-id=\"114\">@Dhruv Dhody</span> , we don't need it at the SPRING WG in IETF in my view ... vendors/operators are free to form their own templates on the routers or in their automation systems.</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T17:44:31Z"}, {"author": "Daniel Bernier", "text": "<p>+1 Ketan</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T17:44:47Z"}, {"author": "Joel Halpern", "text": "<p>Please read and discuss on the list :-)</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T17:44:50Z"}, {"author": "Daniel Bernier", "text": "<p>will do @Joel</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T17:45:16Z"}, {"author": "Joel Halpern", "text": "<p>Speaking personally, I am not at all sure that a head end can reliably determine the available bandwidth on a path?</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T17:48:51Z"}, {"author": "Greg Mirsky", "text": "<p>I'd like to bring your attention to the work on the Precision Availability Metrics <a href=\"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-pam/\">https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-pam/</a></p>", "time": "2023-07-26T17:51:08Z"}, {"author": "Cheng Li", "text": "<p>I think this is useful</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T17:51:31Z"}, {"author": "Ketan Talaulikar", "text": "<p>draft-chen-spring-sr-policy-cp-validity is the other draft that I was referring to.</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T17:54:13Z"}, {"author": "Shuping Peng", "text": "<p>thank you for providing the references @Greg @Ketan</p>", "time": "2023-07-26T17:55:26Z"}]