[{"author": "Erik Kline", "text": "<p><span aria-label=\"wave\" class=\"emoji emoji-1f44b\" role=\"img\" title=\"wave\">:wave:</span></p>", "time": "2023-11-06T14:31:39Z"}, {"author": "Ira McDonald", "text": "<p>show of hands for NTPv5 Requirements to WG Last Call?</p>", "time": "2023-11-06T14:51:24Z"}, {"author": "Douglas Arnold", "text": "<p>Karen is stating it exactly as it is</p>", "time": "2023-11-06T14:55:01Z"}, {"author": "James Gruessing", "text": "<p>To be clear, the current -03 states:</p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Client and server protocol modes MUST be supported, and other modes such as symmetric and broadcast MAY be supported by the protocol but SHOULD NOT be required by implementers to implement.</p>\n</blockquote>", "time": "2023-11-06T14:56:32Z"}, {"author": "Neta Schiff", "text": "<p>In the same topic,  in the ntpv5-01 paper, \"For security reasons, NTPv5 <em>drops</em> support for the symmetric active, symmetric passive, broadcast, control, and private       modes.  \"</p>", "time": "2023-11-06T15:00:02Z"}, {"author": "Neta Schiff", "text": "<p>(in Network Time Protocol Version 5<br>\ndraft-ietf-ntp-ntpv5-01)</p>", "time": "2023-11-06T15:00:52Z"}, {"author": "Martin Langer", "text": "<p>thank you :)</p>", "time": "2023-11-06T15:20:05Z"}, {"author": "Karen O'Donoghue", "text": "<p>thank you remote folks</p>", "time": "2023-11-06T15:20:12Z"}, {"author": "Neta Schiff", "text": "<p>Thanks you:-)</p>", "time": "2023-11-06T15:20:24Z"}]