I just sent a message to Paul directly to ask for him to move this along
", "time": "2023-11-09T12:04:29Z"}, {"author": "Deirdre Connolly", "text": ":+1:
", "time": "2023-11-09T12:11:40Z"}, {"author": "Benjamin Schwartz", "text": "Multi-origin rate limits creates the possibility of overlapping rate-limit contexts, which is a bit puzzling.
", "time": "2023-11-09T12:13:18Z"}, {"author": "Steven Valdez", "text": "If the origin only requests the multi-origin rate limit, then at least against that server you hopefully can ensure non-overlapping limits?
", "time": "2023-11-09T12:15:49Z"}, {"author": "Benjamin Schwartz", "text": "As long as the origin chooses the \"originInfo set\", I think it's OK. If the client performs matching to find the right config, then it's ambiguous.
", "time": "2023-11-09T12:17:26Z"}, {"author": "Deirdre Connolly", "text": ":+1:
", "time": "2023-11-09T12:23:43Z"}, {"author": "Deirdre Connolly", "text": ":laughing:
", "time": "2023-11-09T12:26:41Z"}, {"author": "Deirdre Connolly", "text": ":laughing:
", "time": "2023-11-09T12:32:44Z"}, {"author": "Eric Orth", "text": "Current as in latest draft?
", "time": "2023-11-09T12:36:18Z"}, {"author": "Eric Orth", "text": "I haven't read the latest draft, but unless it's wildly different from the previous drafts, I support adoption.
", "time": "2023-11-09T12:37:29Z"}, {"author": "Benjamin Schwartz", "text": "@Eric Orth It actually is wildly different
", "time": "2023-11-09T12:37:48Z"}, {"author": "Eric Orth", "text": "Well I guess I need to read it again then. Unfortunate that we didn't get it on the agenda.
", "time": "2023-11-09T12:38:38Z"}, {"author": "Christopher Wood", "text": "It's literally on the agenda, being presented right now.
", "time": "2023-11-09T12:38:53Z"}, {"author": "Eric Orth", "text": "(Didn't get it linked on the agenda.)
", "time": "2023-11-09T12:38:54Z"}, {"author": "Eric Orth", "text": "I'd have been more likely to read it in advance if the draft were linked.
", "time": "2023-11-09T12:39:20Z"}, {"author": "Deirdre Connolly", "text": ":+1:
", "time": "2023-11-09T12:44:16Z"}, {"author": "Deirdre Connolly", "text": ":grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:
", "time": "2023-11-09T12:44:50Z"}, {"author": "Steven Valdez", "text": "Correct Draft: https://github.com/chris-wood/draft-group-privacypass-consistency-mirror
", "time": "2023-11-09T12:47:09Z"}, {"author": "Jonathan Hoyland", "text": "@Benjamin Schwartz the issue is that some Geos, e.g. AQ have very, very small populations
", "time": "2023-11-09T12:55:29Z"}, {"author": "Jonathan Hoyland", "text": "(AQ is Antarctica)
", "time": "2023-11-09T12:55:51Z"}, {"author": "Deirdre Connolly", "text": "that anon set is small enough you could probably detect the seasonal changes as people join/leave
", "time": "2023-11-09T12:57:39Z"}, {"author": "Deirdre Connolly", "text": ":+1:
", "time": "2023-11-09T12:59:52Z"}, {"author": "Nick Doty", "text": "the privacy nightmare registry ;)
", "time": "2023-11-09T13:00:38Z"}, {"author": "Deirdre Connolly", "text": ":+1:
", "time": "2023-11-09T13:01:58Z"}, {"author": "Nick Doty", "text": "do we want to see first whether any extensions meet out requirements?
", "time": "2023-11-09T13:04:11Z"}, {"author": "Jonathan Hoyland", "text": "I don't like enumerated at all
", "time": "2023-11-09T13:04:56Z"}, {"author": "Erik Nygren", "text": "I wonder if there's a way to tie this to differential privacy in a provable manner? (ie, you can only use some of these in cases that stay within a differential privacy budget over time? That seems like a research problem?)
", "time": "2023-11-09T13:05:25Z"}, {"author": "Jonathan Hoyland", "text": "2 options \"is Jeff\" and \"is not Jeff\" that sets a single bit for a single user is bad
", "time": "2023-11-09T13:05:51Z"}, {"author": "Thibault Meunier", "text": "to confirm: the adoption call happens by email?
", "time": "2023-11-09T13:06:03Z"}, {"author": "Christopher Wood", "text": "Correct^
", "time": "2023-11-09T13:06:56Z"}, {"author": "Ben S", "text": "Jonathan Hoyland said:
\n\n\n2 options \"is Jeff\" and \"is not Jeff\" that sets a single bit for a single user is bad
\n
We just won't standardise the \"Jeff bit\" ;)
", "time": "2023-11-09T13:07:21Z"}, {"author": "Jonathan Hoyland", "text": "My point is the enumerable req doesn't seem like the right req
", "time": "2023-11-09T13:08:39Z"}, {"author": "Deirdre Connolly", "text": ":wave:
", "time": "2023-11-09T13:10:11Z"}, {"author": "Deirdre Connolly", "text": "hahaha meetecho you're silly
", "time": "2023-11-09T13:10:22Z"}]